Advertisement

An Evolving, Evolutionary Science of Human Differences

  • Jonathan Marks

Abstract

In this chapter, I trace the transformation of the field of biological anthropology from a science of race to a science of human spatiotemporal variation. This has involved grappling with two fallacies over the course of the twentieth century: first, that there is an underlying zoological taxonomic structure to our species and, second, that political and economic history is the consequence of an underlying biological destiny. The history of this science corroborates the anthropological generalization that no human societies contemplate their ancestors and relatives in purely rational terms; but invariably in meaningful, symbolic, and value-laden ways. Acknowledging these properties in our own science allows us to begin grappling with its political and moral dimensions.

Literature Cited

  1. Allen, Garland E. 1983. The Misuse of Biological Hierarchies: The American Eugenics Movement, 1900–1940. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 5 (2): 105–128.Google Scholar
  2. Barash, D.P. 1995. Review of Race, Evolution and Behavior by J. Philippe Rushton. Animal Behaviour 49: 1131–1133.Google Scholar
  3. Boas, Franz. 1911. The Mind of Primitive Man. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1918. Peoples at War. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 1: 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolnick, D.A., D. Fullwiley, T. Duster, R.S. Cooper, J. Fujimura, J. Kahn, J. Kaufman, et al. 2007. The Science and Business of Genetic Ancestry Testing. Science 318: 399–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyd, William C. 1950. Genetics and the Races of Man. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  7. Cochran, Gregory, and H. Harpending. 2009. The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Coon, Carleton S. 1962. The Origin of Races. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1981. Adventures and Discoveries. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Darlington, C. 1969. The Evolution of Man and Society. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  11. Darrow, Clarence. 1925. The Edwardses and the Jukeses. The American Mercury 6: 147–157.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1926. The Eugenics Cult. The American Mercury 8: 129–137.Google Scholar
  13. Davenport, Charles B. 1911. Heredity in Relation to Eugenics. New York: Henry Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diamond, Jared M. 1997. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar
  15. Durkheim, Émile. 1895. Les Règles de la Méthode Sociologique. Paris: Felix Alcan.Google Scholar
  16. Fabian, Ann. 2010. The Skull Collectors: Race, Science, and America’s Unburied Dead. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fields, B., and K. Fields. 2012. Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  18. Fuentes, Agustín. 2010. The New Biological Anthropology: Bringing Washburn’s New Physical Anthropology into 2010 and Beyond—The 2008 AAPA Luncheon Lecture. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 143 (S51): 2–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ———. 2015. Integrative Anthropology and the Human Niche: Toward a Contemporary Approach to Human Evolution. American Anthropologist 117 (2): 302–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Galton, F. 1874. English Men of Science: Their Nature and Nurture. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Gobineau, A. 1853. Essai sur l’Inégalité des Races Humaines, Tome I. Paris: Firmin Didot Fréres.Google Scholar
  22. Grant, Madison. 1916. The Passing of the Great Race. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
  23. Gravlee, Clarence C., H.R. Bernard, and W.R. Leonard. 2003. Heredity, Environment, and Cranial Form: A Reanalysis of Boas’s Immigrant Data. American Anthropologist 105: 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greene, John C. 1954. Some Early Speculations on the Origin of Human Races. American Anthropologist 56: 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haeckel, Ernst. 1868. Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 1916. Ernst Haeckel Gives Germany’s Peace Terms. Celebrated German Scientist Also Discusses the Probable Effect of the Present War Upon Social Progress Throughout the World. The New York Times, 19 March.Google Scholar
  27. Haraway, D. 1989. Primate Visions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Hegeman, Susan. 1998. Franz Boas and Professional Anthropology: On Mapping the Borders of the “Modern”. Victorian Studies 41 (3): 455–483.Google Scholar
  29. Herrnstein, Richard, and Charles Murray. 1994. The Bell Curve. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  30. Holden, Constance. 1980. Identical Twins Reared Apart. Science 207: 1323–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ———. 1987. The Genetics of Personality. Science 237: 598–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 2009. Behavioral Geneticist Celebrates Twins, Scorns PC Science. Science 325: 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hooton, Earnest A. 1936. Plain Statements About Race. Science 83: 511–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hunter, G.W. 1914. A Civic Biology: Presented in Problems. New York: American Book Company.Google Scholar
  35. Huxley, Julian, and A.C. Haddon. 1935. We Europeans. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  36. Jackson, John P., Jr. 2005. Science for Segregation. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  37. Jensen, Arthur. 1969. How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement? Harvard Educational Review 39: 1–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Joseph, Jay. 2014. The Trouble with Twin Studies: A Reassessment of Twin Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Judson, H.F. 2004. The Great Betrayal. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  40. Kahn, J. 2012. Race in a Bottle: The Story of BiDil and Racialized Medicine in a Post-Genomic Age. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Keevak, M. 2011. Becoming Yellow: A Short History of Racial Thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kellogg, Vernon. 1917. Headquarters Nights. Boston: The Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kevles, Daniel J. 1985. In the Name of Eugenics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kincheloe, J.L., S.R. Steinberg, and A.D. Gresson III. 1996. Measured Lies: The Bell Curve Examined. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  45. Köpping, K. 1983. Adolf Bastian and the Psychic Unity of Mankind. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
  46. Krieger, N. 2005. Embodiment: A Conceptual Glossary for Epidemiology. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 59: 350–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lahn, Bruce T., and L. Ebenstein. 2009. Let’s Celebrate Human Genetic Diversity. Nature 461: 726–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lane, C. 1995. The Tainted Sources of ‘The Bell Curve’. New York Review of Books, 14–19, 1 December.Google Scholar
  49. Lasker, Gabriel W. 1999. Happenings and Hearsay: Reflections of a Biological Anthropologist. Detroit, MI: Savoyard Books.Google Scholar
  50. Lewontin, Richard C. 1972. The apportionment of human diversity. Evolutionary Biology 6: 381–398.Google Scholar
  51. Little, Michael A., and Kenneth A.R. Kennedy, eds. 2010. Histories of American Physical Anthropology in the Twentieth Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  52. Livingstone, F.B. 1962. On the Non-Existence of Human Races. Current Anthropology 3: 279–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Livingstone, David. 2008. Adam’s Ancestors: Race, Religion, and the Politics of Human Origins. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Lombardo, P.A. 2002. ‘The American Breed’: Nazi Eugenics and the Origins of the Pioneer Fund. Albany Law Review 65: 207–261.Google Scholar
  55. Lubbock, John. 1865. Pre-Historic Times, as Illustrated by Ancient Remains and the Manners and Customs of Modern Savages. London: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
  56. Marks, Jonathan. 2010. Science, Samples, and People. Anthropology Today 26 (3): 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mekel-Bobrov, N., S. Gilbert, P. Evans, E. Vallender, J. Anderson, R. Hudson, S. Tishkoff, and B. Lahn. 2005. Ongoing Adaptive Evolution of ASPM, a Brain Size Determinant in Homo Sapiens. Science 309: 1720–1722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meloni, Maurizio. 2016. Political Biology: Science and Social Values in Human Heredity from Eugenics to Epigenetics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Montagu, Ashley. 1942. Man’s Most Dangerous Myth: The Fallacy of Race. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Morning, Ann J. 2011. The Nature of Race: How Scientists Think and Teach about Human Difference. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  61. Nelkin, Dorothy, and M. Susan Lindee. 1995. The DNA Mystique: The Gene as Cultural Icon. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  62. Nelson, Alondra. 2016. The Social Life of DNA: Race, Reparations, and Reconciliation After the Genome. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  63. Nott, Josiah C., and G.R. Gliddon. 1854. Types of Mankind. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
  64. Pearson, Karl. 1892. The Grammar of Science. London: Walter Scott.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Punnett, R.C. 1905. Mendelism. Cambridge: Macmillan and Bowes.Google Scholar
  66. Reardon, Jenny. 2004. Race to the Finish: Identity and Governance in an Age of Genomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Regalado, A. 2006. Scientist’s Study of Brain Genes Sparks a Backlash. The Wall Street Journal (June 16), A12.Google Scholar
  68. Richardson, Sarah S. 2011. Race and IQ in the Postgenomic Age: The Microcephaly Case. BioSocieties 6 (4): 420–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ridley, Mark. 2015. The Evolution of Everything: How Ideas Emerge. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  70. Roberts, Dorothy. 2011. Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-Create Race in the Twenty-First Century. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  71. Rushton, J. Philippe. 1995. Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life-History Approach. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  72. ———. 2002. The Pioneer Fund and the Scientific Study of Human Differences. Albany Law Review 66: 207–262.Google Scholar
  73. Segal, Nancy L. 2012. Born Together—Reared Apart: The Landmark Minnesota Twin Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shurkin, Joel N. 2006. Broken Genius: The Rise and Fall of William Shockley, Creator of the Electronic Age. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  75. Spiro, Jonathan. 2009. Defending the Master Race: Conservation, Eugenics, and the Legacy of Madison Grant. Burlington, VT: University Press of Vermont.Google Scholar
  76. Stocking, George W. 1971. “What’s in a Name? The Origins of the Royal Anthropological Institute” (1837–71). Man 6 (3): 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. ———. 1994. Dogmatism, Pragmatism, Essentialism, Relativism: The Boas/Mason Museum Debate Revisited. History of Anthropology Newsletter 21 (1): 3–12.Google Scholar
  78. Sussman, Robert W. 2014. The Myth of Race: The Troubling Persistence of an Unscientific Idea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. TallBear, Kimberly. 2013. Native American DNA. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Thomas, Mark G. 2013. To Claim Someone has ‘’Viking Ancestors’ is No Better Than Astrology. The Guardian, 25 Feb. http://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2013/feb/2025/viking-ancestors-astrology
  81. Tucker, William H. 2002. The Funding of Scientific Racism: Wickliffe Draper and the Pioneer Fund. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  82. Tylor, Edward B. 1871. Primitive Culture. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  83. Van Riper, A. Bowdoin 1993. Men Among the Mammoths: Victorian Science and the Discovery of Human Prehistory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  84. Wade, N. 2014. A Troublesome Inheritance. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  85. Wallace, Alfred R. 1869. [Review of] Principles of Geology [by Sir Charles Lyell, 10th ed.]. The Quarterly Review 126 (252): 359–394.Google Scholar
  86. Washburn, S.L. 1951. The New Physical Anthropology. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, Series II 13: 298–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Weiner, J.S. 1957. Physical Anthropology: An Appraisal. American Scientist 45: 79–87.Google Scholar
  88. Wilson, E.O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Zimmerman, A. 1999. Anti-Semitism as Skill: Rudolf Virchow’s Schulstatistik and the Racial Composition of Germany. Central European History 32 (04): 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. ———. 2001. Anthropology and Antihumanism in Imperial Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Marks
    • 1
  1. 1.UNC- CharlotteCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations