Introducing the New Biosocial Landscape

  • Maurizio Meloni
  • John Cromby
  • Des Fitzgerald
  • Stephanie Lloyd


For many decades, the study of society and the study of biology have been estranged from one another. This Handbook provides the first comprehensive overview of the extent to which, and how quickly, we are moving beyond the charged debates that characterized much of the biological and social thought of the twentieth century. In this Handbook we show how nuanced attention to both the biological and the social sciences opens up novel perspectives on some of the most significant sociological, anthropological, philosophical, and biological questions of our era. Our central assertion is that the life sciences, broadly conceived, are currently moving toward a more social view of biological processes, just as the social sciences are beginning to reincorporate notions of the biological body into their investigations.


  1. Ahmed, Sara. 2008. Open Forum Imaginary Prohibitions: Some Preliminary Remarks on the Founding Gestures of the ‘New Materialism’. European Journal of Women’s Studies 15 (1): 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alder, Ken. 2013. The History of Science as Oxymoron: From Scientific Exceptionalism to Episcience. Isis 104 (1): 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cacioppo, John. 2002. Social Neuroscience: Understanding the Pieces Fosters Understanding the Whole and Vice Versa. American Psychologist 57 (11): 819–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost. 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Draganski, B., et al. 2004. Neuroplasticity: Changes in Grey Matter Induced by Training. Nature 427: 311–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fitzgerald, Des, and Felicity Callard. 2015. Social Science and Neuroscience Beyond Interdisciplinarity: Experimental Entanglements. Theory Culture and Society 32 (1): 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gieryn, Tom. 2002. Three Truth-Spots. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 38: 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilbert, Scott. 2003. The Reactive Genome. In Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology, ed. G.B. Muller and S.A. Newman, 87–101. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gould, E., et al. 1999. Learning Enhances Adult Neurogenesis in the Hippocampal Formation. Nature Neuroscience 2: 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffiths, Paul, and Karola Stotz. 2013. Genetics and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haraway, D. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race and Nature in the World of Modern Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Keller, Evelyn Fox. 2011. Genes, Genomes and Genomics. Biol Theory 6: 132–140. doi: 10.1007/s13752-012-0014-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keller, E.F. 2014. From Gene Action to Reactive Genomes. The Journal of Physiology 592 (11): 2423–2429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2001. Objectual Practice. In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. T.R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, and E. Von Savigny, 184–197. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kronfeldner, Maria. 2009. ‘If There is Nothing Beyond the Organic…’: Heredity and Culture at the Boundaries of Anthropology in the Work of Alfred L. Kroeber. NTM—Journal of the History of Science, Technology and Medicine 17: 107–133.Google Scholar
  19. Landecker, Hannah. 2016. Antibiotic Resistance and the Biology of History. Body & Society 22 (4): 19–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lappé, Martine, and Hannah Landecker. 2015. How the Genome Got a Life Span. New Genetics and Society 34 (2): 152–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewontin, Richard. 2000. The Triple Helix. Gene, Organism, and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lock, Margaret. 2015. Comprehending the Body in the Era of the Epigenome. Current Anthropology 56 (2): 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marmot, M. 2010. Fair Society, Healthy Lives: Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England Post 2010.
  24. Meloni, Maurizio. 2016. Political Biology: Science and Social Values in Human Heredity from Eugenics to Epigenetics. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nading, Alex M. 2012. Dengue Mosquitoes are Single Mothers: Biopolitics Meets Ecological Aesthetics in Nicaraguan Community Health Work. Cultural Anthropology 27 (4, Nov.): 572–596. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01162.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Odling-Smee, John F., Kevin N. Laland, and Marcus W. Feldman. 2003. Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pedwell, Carolyn, and Anne Whitehead. 2012. Affecting Feminism: Questions of Feeling in Feminist Theory. Feminist Theory 13 (2): 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reardon, J. 2013. On the Emergence of Science and Justice. Science, Technology & Human Values 38 (2): 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rheinberger, Hans-Jorg. 2010. An Epistemology of The Concrete: Twentieth Century Histories of Life. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rose, Steven. 1997. Lifelines: Life beyond the Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Rose, Nikolas. 2013. The Human Sciences in a Biological Age. Theory Culture & Society 30 (1): 3–34.Google Scholar
  32. Stallins, J. Anthony, Derek, Law, Sophia, Strosberg, et al. 2016. Geography and Postgenomics: How Space and Place are the New DNA. GeoJournal. 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s10708-016-9763-6.
  33. Wilson, Elizabeth. 2004. Psychosomatic: Feminism and the Neurological Body. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilson, Elizabeth. 2015. Gut Feminism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zembylas, Michalinos. 2007. The Affective Politics of Hatred: Implications for Education. Intercultural Education 18 (3): 177–192. doi: 10.1080/14675980701463513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maurizio Meloni
    • 1
  • John Cromby
    • 2
  • Des Fitzgerald
    • 3
  • Stephanie Lloyd
    • 4
  1. 1.University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  2. 2.University of LeicesterLeicesterUK
  3. 3.Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK
  4. 4.Department of AnthropologyLaval UniversityQuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations