Advertisement

Mobilizing the Evolutionary Tradition: A Darwinian Revolution in Animal Ethics?

  • Chien-hui Li
Chapter
Part of the The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series book series (PMAES)

Abstract

This chapter argues that, despite modern animal activists’ enthusiastic belief in the potential uses of Darwin’s evolutionary theory to elevate animals’ status, the process whereby nineteenth-century activists came to deploy evolutionary ideas was neither inevitable nor straightforward. Factors such as the animal protection movement’s preexisting beliefs, the popular association of Darwinism with the “survival of the fittest,” the pro-vivisection party’s mobilization of evolutionary ideas in their defense of vivisection, and indeed Darwin’s own position in the controversy, all complicated the movement’s appropriation of evolutionary ideas for the animal cause. It was not until the late nineteenth century, with the growing mood of reconciliation between religion and science, and then the availability of a rich repertoire of evolutionary theories during Darwinism’s subsequent “eclipse,” that a growing section of the animal protection movement began to embrace various evolutionary theories. Through an active process of interpretation, appropriation and dissemination, such theories became key intellectual sources in support of the movement’s heterogeneous visions.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Archival and On-line Sources Google Scholar
  2. Darwin Correspondence Project, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Henry Salt Papers, Wynne-Tyson Collection, Sussex.Google Scholar
  4. RSPCA Archives, Horsham, West Sussex.Google Scholar
  5. Official Publication Google Scholar
  6. Minutes of Evidence: Royal Commission on Vivisection. London: H. M. S. O, 1876.Google Scholar
  7. Periodicals Google Scholar
  8. The Animals’ Defender and Zoophilist. Google Scholar
  9. The Animals’ Friend. Google Scholar
  10. The Animals’ Guardian. Google Scholar
  11. The Animal World. Google Scholar
  12. The Anti-Vivisection Review. Google Scholar
  13. The Contemporary Review. Google Scholar
  14. The Edinburgh Review. Google Scholar
  15. The Home Chronicler. Google Scholar
  16. The Humane Review. Google Scholar
  17. The Humanitarian. Google Scholar
  18. Humanity. Google Scholar
  19. Macmillan’s Magazine. Google Scholar
  20. The Times. Google Scholar
  21. The Vegetarian Messenger. Google Scholar
  22. The Voice of Humanity. Google Scholar
  23. The Zoophilist. Google Scholar
  24. The Zoophilist and Animals’ Defender. Google Scholar

Other Printed Primary and Secondary Works

  1. Anon. “The Rights of Animals: Part Two—The Gospel.” Animals’ Friend 5 (1899): 5–7.Google Scholar
  2. “Appendix VI: Darwin and Vivisection.” In The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, Vol. 23, edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al., 579–591. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, Keith Michael. “On the Problem of the Ideological Origins of the French Revolution.” In Modern European Intellectual History: Reappraisals & New Perspectives, edited by Dominick LaCapra and Steven L. Kaplan, 197–219. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  4. Barton, Ruth. “Evolution: The Whitworth Gun in Huxley’s War for the Liberation of Science from Theology.” In The Wider Domain of Evolutionary Theory, edited by David Oldroyd and Ian Lanham, 261–287. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beers, Diane L. For the Prevention of Cruelty: The History and Legacy of Animal Rights Activism in the United States. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, Ernest. “Mutual Aid.” In The Inner Life of Animals, 38–49. London: G. Bell & Sons, 1913.Google Scholar
  7. Besant, Annie. The Seven Principles of Man. Madras: Theosophical Society, 1892.Google Scholar
  8. Boddice, Rod. A History of Attitudes and Behaviours Towards Animals in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Britain: Anthropocentrism and the Emergence of Animals. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  9. Bowler, Peter J. Charles Darwin: The Man and His Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  10. ———. Darwin Deleted: Imagining a World Without Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades Around 1900. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  12. ———. Evolution: The History of an Idea. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  13. ———. Non-Darwinian Revolution: Reinterpreting a Historical Myth. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  14. ———. Reconciling Science and Religion: The Debate in Early-Twentieth-Century Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. “Revisiting the Eclipse of Darwinism.” Journal of the History of Biology 38, no. 1 (2005): 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Browne, Janet. “Darwin in Caricature: A Study in the Popularization and Dissemination of Evolutionary Theory.” In The Art of Evolution: Darwin, Darwinism, and Visual Culture, edited by Barbara Larson and Fae Brauer, 18–39. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  17. Cantor, Geoffrey. Quakers, Jews and Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carpenter, Edward. “The Need of a Rational and Humane Science.” In Humane Science Lectures, edited by Various Authors, 3–33. London: George Bell & Sons, 1897.Google Scholar
  19. Catlett, Stephen. “Huxley, Hutton and the ‘White Rage’: A Debate on Vivisection at the Metaphysical Society.” Archives of Natural History 11 (1983): 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cesaresco, E. M. “The Growth of Modern Ideas on Animals.” Contemporary Review 91 (1907): 68–82.Google Scholar
  21. Chambers, Robert. “Explanations: A Sequel to ‘Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation.”’ In Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation and Other Evolutionary Writings, edited by James Secord, 1–198. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  22. Chartier, Roger. “Intellectual or Sociocultural History.” In Modern European Intellectual History: Reappraisals & New Perspectives, edited by Dominick LaCapra and Steven L. Kaplan, 13–46. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  23. Cleland, John. Experiment on Brute Animals. London: J. W. Kolckmann, 1883.Google Scholar
  24. Cobbe, Frances Power. “Agnostic Morality.” Contemporary Review 43 (1883): 783–794.Google Scholar
  25. ———. Darwinism in Morals and Other Essays. London: Williams and Norgate, 1872.Google Scholar
  26. ———. Life of Frances Power Cobbe, as Told by Herself. London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1904.Google Scholar
  27. ———. “The New Morality.” Zoophilist, January 1885, 167–169.Google Scholar
  28. Coleridge, Stephen. “Darwin and Vivisection.” Animals’ Defender and Zoophilist, July 1920, 17–18.Google Scholar
  29. ———. The Idolatry of Science. London: John Lane, 1920.Google Scholar
  30. Collini, Stefan. Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain, 1850–1930. Oxford: Clarendon, 1991.Google Scholar
  31. Cooter, Roger. The Cultural Meaning of Popular Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  32. Cox, F. A. “The Universal Kinship.” Animals’ Friend, November 1915, 17–18.Google Scholar
  33. Crook, Paul. Darwinism, War and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Darwin, Charles. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Penguin, 2004 [1874, 2nd. ed.].Google Scholar
  35. ———. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: John Murray, 1872.Google Scholar
  36. ———. “Mr. Darwin on Vivisection.” Times, April 18, 1881, 10.Google Scholar
  37. ———. On the Origin of Species. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008 [1859].Google Scholar
  38. Darwin, Francis, ed., The Life of Charles Darwin. London: John Murray, 1908.Google Scholar
  39. ———, ed., More Letters of Charles Darwin: A Record of His Work in a Series of Hitherto Unpublished Letters. London: John Murray, 1903.Google Scholar
  40. Desmond, Adrian. Archetypes and Ancestors: Palaeontology in Victorian London, 1850–1875. London: Blond & Briggs, 1982.Google Scholar
  41. ———. The Politics of Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  42. Dixon, Thomas. The Invention of Altruism: Making Moral Meanings in Victorian Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ellegård, A. Darwin and the General Reader. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990 [1958].Google Scholar
  44. Engels, Eve-Marie, and Thomas F. Glick, eds. The Reception of Charles Darwin in Europe. London: Continuum, 2008.Google Scholar
  45. Evans, E. P. Evolutional Ethics and Animal Psychology. London: William Heinemann, 1898.Google Scholar
  46. Feller, David Allan. “Dog Fight: Darwin as Animal Advocate in the Antivivisection Controversy of 1875.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40, no. 4 (2009): 265–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Foster, Michael. “Vivisection.” Macmillan’s Magazine, March 1874, 367–376.Google Scholar
  48. Geison, Gerald L. Michael Foster and the Cambridge School of Physiology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  49. Gold, Mark. Animal Century: A Celebration of Changing Attitudes to Animals. Charlbury: Jon Carpenter, 1998.Google Scholar
  50. Hammer, Olav. Claiming Knowledge: Strategies of Epistemology from Theosophy to the New Age. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
  51. Hawkes, W. R. Creation’s Friend; Lines Addressed to, and Published with the Approbation of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. London: J. M. Mullinger, 1824.Google Scholar
  52. Heymans, Peter. Animality in British Romanticism: The Aesthetics of Species. London: Routledge, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hill, J. Woodroffe. The Relative Positions of the Higher and Lower Creation; A Plea for Dumb Animals. London: Bailliére, Tindall and Cox, 1881.Google Scholar
  54. Himmelfarb, Gertrude. Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution. New York: W. W. Norton, 1959.Google Scholar
  55. Hodge, Jonathan. “Against ‘Revolution’ and ‘Evolution.’” Journal of the History of Biology 38, no. 1 (2005): 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hutton, R. H. “The Darwinian Jeremiad.” In R. H. Hutton: Critic and Theologian, edited by Malcolm Woodfield, 146–150. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986.Google Scholar
  57. Huxley, Thomas. “The Origin of Species [1860].” In Collected Essays: Volume 2, Darwiniana, edited by Thomas Huxley, 22–79. London: Macmillan, 1893.Google Scholar
  58. Inge, W. R. Lay Thoughts of a Dean. London: Putnam, 1926.Google Scholar
  59. ———. More Lay Thoughts of a Dean. London: Putnam, 1931.Google Scholar
  60. Japp, A. H. Darwin Considered Mainly as Ethical Thinker, Human Reformer and Pessimist. London: J. Bale, Sons & Danielsson, 1901.Google Scholar
  61. ———. “Darwinism and Humanitarianism: To the Editor of The Humane Review.” Humane Review 2 (1901): 377–384.Google Scholar
  62. Jones, Greta. Social Darwinism and English Thought. Brighton: Harvester, 1980.Google Scholar
  63. Kean, Hilda. Animal Rights: Social and Political Change Since 1800. London: Reaktion, 1998.Google Scholar
  64. Kenealy, A. The Failure of Vivisection and the Future of Medical Research. London: George Bell & Sons, 1909.Google Scholar
  65. Kenyon-Jones, Christine. Kindred Brutes: Animals in Romantic-Period Writing. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001.Google Scholar
  66. Kidd, Benjamin. Social Evolution. London: Macmillan, 1894.Google Scholar
  67. Kingland, W. The Mission of Theosophy. London: Theosophical Publishing Society, 1892.Google Scholar
  68. Kropotkin, Peter. “Appendix: Natural Selection and Mutual Aid.” In Humane Science Lectures, edited by Various Authors, 182–186. London: G. Bell & Sons, 1897.Google Scholar
  69. Lee, Vernon. “Vivisection: An Evolutionist to Evolutionist.” Contemporary Review 41 (1882): 803–811.Google Scholar
  70. Li, Chien-hui. “The Theosophical Turn of Annie Besant: Religion, Science and Reform.” Cheng Kung Journal of Historical Studies, no. 51 (2016): 113–170 (In Chinese).Google Scholar
  71. Lightman, Bernard. “The Popularization of Evolution and Victorian Culture.” In Evolution and Victorian Culture, edited by Bernard Lightman and Bennett Zon, 286–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. ———. “Science and Culture.” In The Cambridge Companion to Victorian Culture, edited by Francis O’ Gorman, 12–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  73. Lightman, Bernard, and Bennett Zone, eds. Evolution and Victorian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  74. Lind-af-Hageby, L. Mountain Meditations and Some Subjects of the Day and the War. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1917.Google Scholar
  75. ———. “The Science and Faith of Universal Kinship.” Vegetarian Messenger, May 1914, 155–162.Google Scholar
  76. Moore, James R. The Post-Darwinian Controversies: A Study of the Protestant Struggle to Come to Terms with Darwin in Great Britain and America 1870–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  77. Moore, John Howard. Ethics and Education. London: G. Bell & Sons, 1912.Google Scholar
  78. ———. The New Ethics. London: George Bell & Sons, 1907.Google Scholar
  79. ———. “The Psychical Kinship of Man and the Other Animals.” Humane Review 1 (1900–1901): 121–133.Google Scholar
  80. ———. The Universal Kinship. Fontwell, Sussex: Centaur Press, 1992 [1906].Google Scholar
  81. ———. The Whole World Kin: A Study in Threefold Evolution. London: George Bell & Sons, 1906.Google Scholar
  82. Morris, F. O. A Curse of Cruelty. London: Elliot Stock, 1886.Google Scholar
  83. ———. The Demands of Darwinism on Credulity. Partridge, 1890.Google Scholar
  84. ———. Difficulties of Darwinism: Read Before the British Association. London, 1869.Google Scholar
  85. ———. Double Dilemma in Darwinism. London: William Poole, 1870.Google Scholar
  86. ———. “Infidelity and Cruelty.” Home Chronicler, July 14, 1878, 126.Google Scholar
  87. Numbers, R. L., and J. Stenhouse, eds. Disseminating Darwinism: The Role of Place, Race, Religion, and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  88. Paul, Diane B. “Darwin, Social Darwinism and Eugenics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Darwin, edited by Jonathan Hodge and Gregory Radick, 214–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  89. Perkins, David. Romanticism and Animal Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Preece, Rod. Brute Souls, Happy Beasts, and Evolution: The Historical Status of Animals. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  91. ———. “Darwinism, Christianity, and the Great Vivisection Debate.” Journal of the History of Ideas 64, no. 3 (2003): 399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. ———. “The Role of Evolutionary Thought in Animal Ethics.” In Critical Animal Studies: Thinking the Unthinkable, edited by John Sorenson, 67–78. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  93. ———. “Thoughts Out of Season on the History of Animal Ethics.” Society and Animals 15, no. 4 (2007): 365–378.Google Scholar
  94. Rachels, J. Created from Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  95. A Report of the Proceedings at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Promoting Rational Humanity Towards the Animal Creation. London: APRHAC, 1832.Google Scholar
  96. Richards, Robert J. Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. ———. The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ritvo, Harriet. The Animal Estate: The English and Other Creatures in the Victorian Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  99. Romanes, Ethel Duncan. Life and Letters of George John Romanes. London: Longmans, Green, 1896.Google Scholar
  100. Ruse, Michael. The Darwinian Revolution: Nature Red in Tooth and Claw. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  101. ———. Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  102. Russell, Arthur. Papers Read at the Meetings of the Metaphysical Society. Privately printed, 1896.Google Scholar
  103. Rylance, Rick. Victorian Psychology and British Culture 1850–1880. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  104. Salt, H. S. Animals’ Rights. Clarks Summits, PA: Society for Animal Rights, 1980 [1892].Google Scholar
  105. ———. “Concerning Faddists.” Anti-Vivisection and Humanitarian Review, November–December 1927, 239–240.Google Scholar
  106. ———. The Creed of Kinship. London: Constable, 1935.Google Scholar
  107. ———. “Howard Moore.” Humanitarian, September 1916, 177–179.Google Scholar
  108. ———. Humanitarianism. London: HL, 1893.Google Scholar
  109. ———. “Mr. Chesterton’s Mountain.” Humane Review 7 (1906): 84–89.Google Scholar
  110. ———. Seventy Years Among Savages. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1921.Google Scholar
  111. Secord, James. “Introduction.” In Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation and Other Evolutionary Writings, edited by James Secord, ix–xlv. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  112. ———. Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  113. Shaw, George Bernard. Back to Methuselah: A Metabiological Pentateuch. New York: Brentano’s, 1929 [1921].Google Scholar
  114. Singer, Peter. A Darwinian Left: Politics, Evolution and Cooperation. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1999.Google Scholar
  115. ———. Animal Liberation. London: Pimlico, 1995.Google Scholar
  116. Skinner, Quentin. Visions of Politics, Volume I: Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Spencer, Jane. ‘“Love and Hatred Are Common to the Whole Sensitive Creation’: Animal Feeling in the Century Before Darwin.” In After Darwin: Animals, Emotions, and the Mind, edited by Angelique Richardson, 24–50. Amsterdam: Rodipi, 2013.Google Scholar
  118. Styles, John. The Animal Creation: Its Claims on Our Humanity Stated and Enforced. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1997 [1839].Google Scholar
  119. Tait, Lawson. “Dogs.” Animal World, February 1870, 92; March 1870, 98–99; April 1870, 122–123.Google Scholar
  120. Thomas, Keith. Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England 1500–1800. London: Penguin, 1984.Google Scholar
  121. Thomson, J. A. “The Humane Study of Natural History.” In Humane Science Lectures, 35–76. London: G. Bell & Sons, 1897.Google Scholar
  122. Turner, Frank M. Between Science and Religion: The Reaction to Scientific Naturalism in Late Victorian England. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  123. ———. Contesting Cultural Authority: Essays in Victorian Intellectual Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. White, Paul. “Darwin Wept: Science and the Sentimental Subject.” Journal of Victorian Culture 16, no. 2 (2011): 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. ———. “Introduction: Science, Literature, and the Darwin Legacy.” Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century (On-line Journal), September 2010.Google Scholar
  126. Wise, Steven M. Rattling the Cage. London: Profile Books, 2000.Google Scholar
  127. Worster, Donald. Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  128. Youatt, William. The Obligation and Extent of Humanity to Brutes. London: Longman, 1839.Google Scholar
  129. Young, Robert M. Mind, Brain, and Adaptation in the Nineteenth Century: Cerebral Localization and Its Biological Context from Gall to Ferrier. Oxford: Clarendon, 1970.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chien-hui Li
    • 1
  1. 1.National Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations