Advertisement

Mobilizing the Christian Tradition: True Patriots and the Sacrificial Spirit of Christ

  • Chien-hui Li
Chapter
Part of the The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series book series (PMAES)

Abstract

This chapter considers the Christian tradition, the influence of which deeply penetrated nineteenth-century’s social and political life as well as impinging upon the nineteenth-century animal protection movement. Instead of focusing on the major theologians and canonical texts, as in the conventional history of ideas, I examine the initiatives taken by laity and clergy within the animal protection movement itself in relation to the Christian tradition. I present the Christian faith as the central source of identification, justification, and inspiration for the majority of the people in the anti-cruelty and anti-vivisection movements and illustrate how these people actively drew upon the resources in the Christian tradition to meet their various mobilizing tasks and objectives. By appropriating theological concepts such as Creationism, human dominion over animals, the benevolence of God, the sacrificial spirit of Christ, as well as anti-science rhetoric and critiques that were current in the wider controversies concerning religion and science in society, animal protectionists not only turned Christianity into a central cultural force in the movement, but also recreated a positive Christian sub-tradition of humanity toward animals in nineteenth-century Britain.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Archival Sources Google Scholar
  2. Blue Cross Archives, Burford, Oxfordshire.Google Scholar
  3. BUAV Archives, University of Hull, Hull.Google Scholar
  4. RSPB Archives, Sandy, Bedfordshire.Google Scholar
  5. RSPCA Archives, Horsham, West Sussex.Google Scholar
  6. Official Publications Google Scholar
  7. Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates, London.Google Scholar
  8. Periodicals Google Scholar
  9. The Abolitionist. Google Scholar
  10. The Animals’ Friend. Google Scholar
  11. The Contemporary Review. Google Scholar
  12. The Edinburgh Review. Google Scholar
  13. The Fortnightly Review. Google Scholar
  14. The Herald of Humanity. Google Scholar
  15. The Home Chronicler. Google Scholar
  16. The Humane Review. Google Scholar
  17. The Monthly Record and Animals’ Guardian. Google Scholar
  18. Progress of Humanity. Google Scholar
  19. The Voice of Humanity. Google Scholar
  20. The Times. Google Scholar
  21. Verulam Review. Google Scholar
  22. The Zoophilist. Google Scholar
  23. The Zoophilist and Animals’ Defender. Google Scholar

Other Printed Primary and Secondary Works

  1. Adams, C. The Coward Science: Our Answer to Prof. Owen. London: Hatchards, 1882.Google Scholar
  2. An Address to the Public from the Society for the Suppression of Vice, Part the Second. London: SSV, 1803.Google Scholar
  3. Against Vivisection: Verbatim Report of the Speeches at the Great Public Demonstration. London: LAVS, 1899.Google Scholar
  4. Altholz, J. L. “The Warfare of Conscience with Theology.” In Religion in Victorian Britain, Volume IV Interpretations, edited by Gerald Parsons, 150–169. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  5. Anon. Short Stories. Awful Instances of God’s Immediate Judgement for Cruelty to Brute Creation. London: SPCA, 1837.Google Scholar
  6. Barrett, R. “May a Christian Tolerate Cruelty?” Home Chronicler, July 6, 1878, 11.Google Scholar
  7. Barton, Ruth. “Evolution: The Whitworth Gun in Huxley’s War for the Liberation of Science from Theology.” In The Wider Domain of Evolutionary Theory, edited by David Oldroyd and Ian Lanham, 261–287. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. _____. “Huxley, Lubbock, and Half a Dozen Others: Professional and Gentlemen in the Formation of the X Club, 1851–1864.” Isis 89, no. 3 (1998): 410–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bebbington, D. W. Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History from the 1730s to the 1980s. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. Berdoe, Edward. An Address on the Attitude of the Christian Church Towards Vivisection. London: VSS, 1891.Google Scholar
  11. ———. “Progressive Morality.” Zoophilist, January 1914, 140–141.Google Scholar
  12. Best, Geoffrey. “Evangelicalism and the Victorians.” In The Victorian Crisis of Faith, edited by Anthony Symondson, 37–56. London: SPCK, 1970.Google Scholar
  13. Brooke, J. H. Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  14. Buchanan, Robert. The City of Dream: An Epic Poem. London: Chatto & Windus, 1888.Google Scholar
  15. ———. “The City Without God.” The Monthly Record and Animals’ Guardian, June 1901, 66–67.Google Scholar
  16. Bynum, W. E. Science and the Practice of Medicine in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  17. Cannadine, David. Ornamentalism: How the British Saw Their Empire. London: Penguin, 2001.Google Scholar
  18. Charlton [Hon. Mrs.]. Toilers and Toll at the Outposts of Empire. London: RSPCA, 1911.Google Scholar
  19. Clark, G. Kitson. The Making of Victorian England. London: Routledge, 1962.Google Scholar
  20. Cobbe, F. P. The Churches and Moral Questions. London: VSS, 1889.Google Scholar
  21. ———. The Fallacy of Restriction Applied to Vivisection. London: VSS, n.d.Google Scholar
  22. ———. Life of Frances Power Cobbe as Told by Herself. London: S. Sonnenschein, 1904.Google Scholar
  23. ———. “Magnanimous Atheism.” In The Peak in Darien, 9–74. Boston: Geo. H. Ellism, 1882.Google Scholar
  24. ———. “Miss Frances Power Cobbe on ‘Lesser Measures.’” Zoophilist, February 1898, 171–172.Google Scholar
  25. ———. “Mr. Lowe and the Vivisection Act.” Contemporary Review 29 (1876–1877): 335–347.Google Scholar
  26. ———. “The New Morality.” In The Modern Rack: Papers on Vivisection, 65–69. London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1889.Google Scholar
  27. ———. The Nine Circles of the Hell of the Innocent: Described from the Reports of the Presiding Spirits. London: Sonnenschein & Co., 1892.Google Scholar
  28. ———. The Scientific Spirit of the Age, and Other Pleas and Discussions. Boston: G.H. Ellis, 1888.Google Scholar
  29. Coleridge, J. D. “The Nineteenth Century Defenders of Vivisection.” The Fortnightly Review 31, no. 1 (1882): 225–236.Google Scholar
  30. Coleridge, Stephen. “The Aim and Policy of the National Anti-Vivisection Society.” Zoophilist, October 1900, 138–139.Google Scholar
  31. ———. “Dr. Randall Davidson, Archbishop of Canterbury.” Zoophilist, October 1912, 94.Google Scholar
  32. ———. Great Testimony against Scientific Cruelty. London: Bodley Head, 1918.Google Scholar
  33. ———. The Idolatry of Science. London: John Lane, 1920.Google Scholar
  34. Collini, Stefan. Matthew Arnold: A Critical Portrait. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  35. ———. Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  36. Colonel Osborn. Colonel Osborn on Christianity and Modern Science. London: VSS, 1891(?).Google Scholar
  37. Cough, David L. On Animals: Volume 1 Systematic Theology. London: T&T Clark, 2012.Google Scholar
  38. ———. On Animals: Volume 2 Theological Ethics. London: T&T Clark, 2017.Google Scholar
  39. Crowe, Henry. Animadversions on Cruelty to the Brute Creation, Addressed Chiefly to the Lower Classes. Bath: J. Browne, 1825.Google Scholar
  40. Cunningham, Andrew and Perry Williams, eds. The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  41. Davis, Janet M. The Gospel of Kindness: Animal Welfare & the Making of Modern America. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Dawson, Gowan and Bernard Lightman, eds. Victorian Scientific Naturalism: Community, Identity and Continuity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  43. Dent, John. Bull Baiting! A Sermon on Barbarity to God’s Dumb Creation. Reading: Smart and Cowslade, 1801.Google Scholar
  44. ———. The Pleasures of Benevolence; A Poem. London: Hunter, 1835.Google Scholar
  45. De Vries, Jacqueline and Sue Morgan, eds. Women, Gender and Religious Cultures in Britain, 1800–1940. London: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
  46. Donald, Diana. Picturing Animals in Britain 1750–1850. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  47. ———. Women Against Cruelty: Animal Protection in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Manchester: Manchester University Press, forthcoming in 2019.Google Scholar
  48. Drummond, William H. Humanity to Animals the Christian’s Duty; A Discourse. London: Hunter, 1830.Google Scholar
  49. Dunkley, C. ed. The Official Report of the Church Congress, Held at Folkestone, 1892. London: Bemrose & Sons, 1892.Google Scholar
  50. Durbach, Nadja. Bodily Matters: The Anti-Vaccination Movement in England, 1853–1907. Durham: Duke University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  51. Eldridge, C. C. England’s Mission: The Imperial Idea in the Age of Gladstone and Disraeli 1865–1880. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Elston, Mary Ann. “Women and Anti-vivisection in Victorian England, 1870–1900.” In Vivisection in Historical Perspective, edited by N. A. Rupke, 259–294. London: Routledge, 1987.Google Scholar
  53. Englander, David. “The Word and the World: Evangelicalism in the Victorian City.” In Religion in Victorian Britain, Vol. 2, Controversies, edited by Gerald Parsons, 14–38. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  54. Fairholme, E. G. and W. Pain. A Century of Work for Animals: The History of the R.S.P.C.A., 1824–1924. London: John Murray, 1924.Google Scholar
  55. Feller, David Allan. “Dog Fight: Darwin as Animal Advocate in the Antivivisection Controversy of 1875.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40, no. 3. (2009): 265–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. French, Richard D. Anti-Vivisection and Medical Science in Victorian Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  57. Fyfe, Aileen. Science and Salvation: Evangelical Popular Science Publishing in Victorian Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Galton, Francis. English Men of Science: Their Nature and Nurture. London: Macmillan, 1874.Google Scholar
  59. Geison, Gerald L. Michael Foster and the Cambridge School of Physiology: The Scientific Enterprise in Late Victorian Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  60. Glaholt, Halye Rose. “Vivisection as War: The ‘Moral Disease’ of Animal Experimentation and Slavery in British Victorian Quaker Pacifist Ethics.” Society and Animals 20 (2012): 154–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Gompertz, Lewis. Fragments in Defence of Animals. London: W. Horsell, 1852.Google Scholar
  62. _____. Objects and Address of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. London: William Molineux, 1829.Google Scholar
  63. Granger, James. An Apology for the Brute Creation. London: T. Davies, 1772.Google Scholar
  64. Green, S. J. D. Religion in the Age of Decline: Organisation and Experience in Industrial Yorkshire, 1870–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Greenwood, Thomas. “The Existing and Predicted State of the Inferior Creatures, A Sermon.” The Voice of Humanity 2 (1831): 148–158.Google Scholar
  66. ———. “On National Cruelty.” The Voice of Humanity 1 (1830): 141–147.Google Scholar
  67. Hamilton, Susan. “Introduction.” In Anima Welfare & Anti-Vivisection 1870–1910, Vol. 1, edited by Susan Hamilton, xiv–xlvii. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
  68. Harrison, Brian. Peaceable Kingdom: Stability and Change in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon, 1982.Google Scholar
  69. Harrison, J. F. C. Late Victorian Britain 1875–1901. London: Fontana, 1990.Google Scholar
  70. Hart, Samuel Hopgood, ed. Anna Kingsford: Her Life, Letters, Diary and Work. By Her Collaborator Edward Maitland, Vol. I, 3rd ed. London: J.M. Watkins, 1913.Google Scholar
  71. Helmstadter, Richard J. and Bernard Lightman. Victorian Faith in Crisis: Essays on Continuity and Change in Nineteenth-Century Religious Belief. London: Macmillan, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hilton, Boyd. The Age of Atonement: The Influence of Evangelicalism on Social and Economic Thought, 1785–1865. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  73. Houghton, Walter E. The Victorian Frame of Mind, 1830–1870. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  74. Hunt, Alan. Governing Morals: A Social History of Moral Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  75. Hunt, John. The Relation Between Man and the Brute Creation: A Sermon. London: Whittaker and Co., 1865.Google Scholar
  76. Innes, Joanna. “Politics and Morals: the Reformation of Manners Movement in Later Eighteenth-Century England.” In Inferior Politics: Social Problems and Social Policies in Eighteenth-Century Britain, 179–226. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Linzey, Andrew. Animal Rights: A Christian Assessment of Man’s Treatment of Animals. London: SCM Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  78. ———. Animal Theology. London: SCM Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  79. ———. Christianity and the Rights of Animals. London: SPCK, 1987.Google Scholar
  80. Linzey, Andrew and Dan Cohn-Sherbok. After Noah: Animals and the Liberation of Theology. London: Mowbray, 1997.Google Scholar
  81. Linzey, Andrew and Dorothy Yamamoto, eds. Animals on the Agenda: Questions About Animals for Theology and Ethics. London: SCM Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  82. Lansbury, Carol. The Old Brown Dog: Women, Workers, and Vivisection in Edwardian England. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  83. Lightman, Bernard. Evolutionary Naturalism in Victorian Britain: The “Darwinians” and Their Critics. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar
  84. ———. “Science and Culture.” In The Cambridge Companion to Victorian Culture, edited by Francis O’ Gorman, 12–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  85. ———. “Victorian Sciences and Religion: Discordant Harmonies.” Osiris 16 (2001): 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lightman, Bernard and Michael S. Reidy, eds. The Age of Scientific Naturalism: Tyndall and His Contemporaries. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2014.Google Scholar
  87. Livingstone, D. N., D. G. Hart and M. A. Noll, eds. Evangelicals and Science in Historical Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  88. Lumsden, L. I. An Address Given at the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Scottish Branch of the National Anti-Vivisection Society. London: NAVS, n.d.Google Scholar
  89. Macaulay, James. Essay on Cruelty to Animals. Edinburgh: John Johnstone, 1839.Google Scholar
  90. Man’s Relation to the Lower Animals, Viewed from the Christian Standpoint: A Lecture. London: CAVL, n.d.Google Scholar
  91. Miller, Ian. “Necessary Torture? Vivisection, Suffragette Force-Feeding, and Responses to Scientific Medicine in Britain c. 1870–1920.” Journal of the History of Medicine 64, no. 3 (2009): 333–372.Google Scholar
  92. Morris, F. O. The Cowardly Cruelty of the Experiments on Animals. London: n.p., 1890.Google Scholar
  93. Moore, James R. Post-Darwinian Controversies: A Study of the Protestant Struggle to Come to Terms with Darwin in Great Britain and America, 1870–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  94. ———. “Theodicy and Society: The Crisis of the Intelligentsia.” In Victorian Faith in Crisis: Essays on Continuity and Change in Nineteenth-Century Religious Belief, edited by Richard J. Helmstadter and Bernard Lightman, 153–186. London: Macmillan, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Moore, Thomas. The Sin and Folly of Cruelty to Brute Animals: A Sermon. Birmingham: J. Belcher and Son, 1810.Google Scholar
  96. On Cruelty to Animals. London: Tract Association of the Society of Friends, 1856.Google Scholar
  97. Ouida. “The Culture of Cowardice.” The Humane Review 1 (1900): 110–119.Google Scholar
  98. ———. “Our Cause in the Pulpit,” Zoophilist, June 1891, 27.Google Scholar
  99. Owen, Alex. The Place of Enchantment: British Occultism and the Culture of the Modern. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Oxenham, H. N. Moral and Religious Estimate of Vivisection. London: John Hodges, 1878.Google Scholar
  101. Parry, Jonathan. Democracy and Religion: Gladstone and the Liberal Party, 1867–1875. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Porter, Roy, ed. The Cambridge History of Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  103. Preece, Rod. Animals and Nature: Culture Myths, Culture Realities. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  104. Preece, Rod and Chien-hui Li, eds. William Drummond’s The Rights of Animals and Man’s Obligation to Treat Them with Humanity (1838). Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  105. Primatt, Humphrey. The Duty of Mercy and the Sin of Cruelty to Brute Animals. Fontwell, Sussex: Centaur, 1992 [1776].Google Scholar
  106. Prochaska, F. K. Women and Philanthropy in Nineteenth-Century England. Oxford: Clarendon, 1980.Google Scholar
  107. Remarks of the Proceedings of the Voice of Humanity and the Association for Promoting Rational Humanity to the Animal Creation. London: AFS, n.d.Google Scholar
  108. Report of an Extra Meeting of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. London: SPCA, 1832.Google Scholar
  109. A Report of the Proceedings at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Promoting Rational Humanity Towards the Animal Creation. London: APRHAC, 1832.Google Scholar
  110. Report of the Society for Preventing Wanton Cruelty to Brute Animals. Liverpool: Egerton Smith & Co., 1809.Google Scholar
  111. Ritvo, Harriet. “Animals in Nineteenth-Century Britain: Complicated Attitudes and Competing Categories.” In Animals and Human Society: Changing Perspectives, edited by Aubrey Manning and James Serpell, 106–126. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
  112. Roberts, M. J. D. Making English Morals: Voluntary Association and Moral Reform in England, 1787–1886. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Rowell, Geoffrey. Hell and the Victorians: A Study of the Nineteenth-Century Theological Controversies Concerning Eternal Punishment and the Future Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Rupke, N. A. ed. Vivisection in Historical Perspective. London: Routledge, 1987.Google Scholar
  115. The Scientist at the Bedside. London: VSS, 1887.Google Scholar
  116. Sharp, Samuel. An Essay in Condemnation of Cruelty to Animals. London: Messrs. Simpkin, Marshall and Co., 1851.Google Scholar
  117. Short Stories No. 3. On Cruelty to Animals. London: SPCA, 1837.Google Scholar
  118. Singer, Peter. Animal Liberation, 2nd ed. London: Pimlico, 1995.Google Scholar
  119. Skinner, Simon. “Religion.” In Languages of Politics in Nineteenth-Century Britain, edited by David Craig and James Thompson, 93–117. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Smith, Abraham. A Scriptural and Moral Catechism Designed to Inculcate the Love and Practice of Mercy, and to Expose the Exceeding Sinfulness of Cruelty to the Dumb Creation. London: SPCA, 1839.Google Scholar
  121. Smith, Egerton. “Prospectus of the Late Association for Promoting Rational Humanity Towards the Animal Creation.” In Elysium of Animals: A Dream, 1. London: J. Nisbet, 1836.Google Scholar
  122. SPCA. Report of an Extra Meeting of the Society for the Protection of Animals. London: SPCA, 1832.Google Scholar
  123. Stevenson, L. G. “Religious Elements in the Background of the British Anti-Vivisection Movement.” Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 29 (1956): 125–157.Google Scholar
  124. Styles, John. The Animal Creation: Its Claims on Our Humanity Stated and Enforced. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1997 [1839].Google Scholar
  125. Topham, Jonathan R. “Science, Natural Theology, and Evangelicalism in Early Nineteenth-Century Scotland.” In Evangelical and Science in Historical Perspective, edited by David N. Livingstone, D. G. Hart, and Mark A. Noll, 142–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  126. Turner, Frank. Between Science and Religion: The Reaction to Scientific Naturalism in Late Victorian England. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  127. ———. Contesting Cultural Authority: Essays in Victorian Intellectual Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. ———. “The Victorian Crisis of Faith and the Faith That Was Lost.” In Victorian Faith in Crisis, edited by R. J. Helmstadter and B. Lightman, 3–98. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990.Google Scholar
  129. Trist, Sidney. De Profundis: An Open Letter. London: LAVS, 1911.Google Scholar
  130. Verschoyle, J. “The True Party of Progress.” Zoophilist, January 1884, 232–233.Google Scholar
  131. V. W., “Half a Loaf.” Zoophilist, August 1902, 70.Google Scholar
  132. Waldau, Paul and Kimberley Patton, eds. A Communion of Subjects: Animals in Religion, Science & Ethics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  133. Webb, S. H. On God and Dogs: A Christian Theology of Compassion for Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  134. White, Lynn. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis.” Science 155, no. 3767 (1967): 1203–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Wilcox, Ella Wheeler. “Christ Crucified.” In Poems by Ella Wheeler Wilcox, 106–108. London: Gay & Hancock, 1913.Google Scholar
  136. Wise, Steven M. Rattling the Cage: Towards Legal Rights for Animals. London: Profile Books, 2001.Google Scholar
  137. Wolffe, J. God and Greater Britain: Religion and National Life in Britain and Ireland 1843–1945. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
  138. Worboys, M. The Transformation of Medicine and the Medical Profession in Britain 1860–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chien-hui Li
    • 1
  1. 1.National Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations