Advertisement

Silences: Coping with Infertility in Nineteenth-Century Germany

  • Christina Benninghaus
Chapter

Abstract

Experiences of infertility are hard to recover. Nineteenth-century women and men who encountered reproductive difficulties have left few traces in the historical record. Their silences are one of the reasons why historians of the family, gender, and sexuality were slow to turn their attention to unintended childlessness. But while the reticence of past actors is frustrating for the historian, it might have made sense to those concerned. This chapter explores how people talked or avoided talking about reproductive failure. It looks at moments of communication as represented in fictional texts, letters, diaries, and autobiographies. Drawing on stigma theory and historical studies on silences, it argues that reticence served a purpose, that it was a coping strategy and helped to avoid confrontations and challenging questions regarding the meaning of marriage, love, and reproduction.

Keywords

Coping strategies Experiences of infertility Silence Stigma 

Research Resources

Primary Sources

  1. Birgit Bublies-Godau (ed.), ‘Dass die Frauen bessere Democraten, geborene Democraten seyen…’ Henriette Obermüller-Venedey‘s Tagebücher und Lebenserinnerungen 1817–1871 (Karlsruhe: Badenia, 1999).Google Scholar
  2. Mathilde Eckardt (ed.), Briefe aus alter Zeit. Wilhelmine Heyne-Heeren an Marianne Friederike Bürger, 1794–1803 und ein Nachtrag (Hannover: Ernst Geibel, 1913).Google Scholar
  3. Ilse Foerst-Crato (ed.), Frauen zur Goethezeit. Ein Briefwechsel: Caroline von Humboldt, Friederike Brun (Düsseldorf: Selbstverlag, 1975).Google Scholar
  4. Georg Gottfried Gervinus, G. G. Gervinus Leben. Von ihm selbst. 1860 (Leipzig: Engelmann, 1893).Google Scholar
  5. Ignát Herrmann, ‘Childless’, in Marie Busch (ed.), Selected Czech Tales, trans. Marie Busch and Otto Pick (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1925), 97–164.Google Scholar
  6. Hans von Hoffensthal Lori Graff (Berlin: Egon Fleischel und Co., 1909).Google Scholar
  7. John Frederick Stark, J.F. Stark’s Daily Hand-Book for Days of Rejoicing and of Sorrow (Philadelphia, PA: Kohler, 1879).Google Scholar
  8. Adalbert Stifter, ‘Der Waldgänger’, in Johann Grafen Mailáth (ed.), Iris. Deutscher Almanach für 1847 (Pesth: Heckenast, 1847), 1–112.Google Scholar
  9. Adelheid Sturm, Lebens-Erinnerungen einer Professorenfrau (Breslau: Fleischmann, 1901).Google Scholar
  10. C. Vann Woodward and Elisabeth Muhlenfeld (ed.), The Private Mary Chesnut: The Unpublished Civil War Diaries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  11. Clara Viebig, The Son of His Mother. Authorised Translation by H. Raahauge (London: Bodley Head, 1913).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Jill Allison, ‘Conceiving Silence: Infertility as Discursive Contradiction in Ireland’, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 25:1 (2011), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbara Beck, Mathilde Großherzogin von Hessen und bei Rhein, geb. Prinzessin von Bayern (1813–1862). Mittlerin zwischen München und Darmstadt (Darmstadt: Eduard Roether Verlag, 1993).Google Scholar
  3. Barbara Berg ‘Listening to the Voices of the Infertile’, in Joan C. Callahan (ed.), Reproduction, Ethics, and the Law: Feminist Perspectives (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, IN, 1995), 80–108.Google Scholar
  4. Christina Benninghaus, ‘Brennende Sehnsüchte, heimliche Ängste – Kinderlosigkeit, Vererbung und Adoption im naturalistischen Roman um 1900’, Zeitenblicke, 7:3 (2008): http://www.zeitenblicke.de/2008/3/benninghaus/index_html.
  5. Christina Benninghaus, ‘“No, Thank You, Mr Stork!”: Voluntary Childlessness in Weimar and Contemporary Germany’, Studies in the Maternal, 6:1 (2014): http://doi.org/10.16995/sim.8.
  6. Deborah Cohen, Family Secrets: Living with Shame from the Victorians to the Present Day (London: Viking, 2013).Google Scholar
  7. Erving Goffman, Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1963).Google Scholar
  8. Arthur L. Greil, Kathleen Slauson-Blevins and Julia McQuillan, ‘The Experience of Infertility: A Review of Recent Literature’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 32:1 (2010), 140–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Margaret Marsh and Wanda Ronner, The Empty Cradle: Infertility in America from Colonial Times to the Present (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  10. Elaine Tyler May, Barren in the Promised Land: Childless Americans and the Pursuit of Happiness (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  11. Papreen Nahar and Sjaak Van Der Geest, ‘How Women in Bangladesh Confront the Stigma of Childlessness: Agency, Resilience, and Resistance’, Medical Anthropology, 38:3 (2014), 381–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Naomi Pfeffer, The Stork and the Syringe: A Political History of Reproductive Medicine (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  13. Larissa Remennick, ‘Childless in the Land of Imperative Motherhood: Stigma and Coping Among Infertile Israeli Women’, Sex Roles, 43:11/12 (2000), 821–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Catherine Kohler Riessman, ‘Stigma and Everyday Resistance Practices: Childless Women in South India’, Gender & Society, 14:1 (2000), 111–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Michel-Rolph Trouillot, Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  16. Martina Winkler, ‘Vom Nutzen und Nachteil literarischer Quellen für Historiker’, in Martin Schulze Wessel (ed.), Digitales Handbuch zur Geschichte und Kultur Russlands und Osteuropas (München: ViFaOst, 2009), No. 21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Historisches InstitutJustus Liebig UniversityGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations