Advertisement

Being Paid to Produce Eggs and Sperm: Gender, Commodification, and the Bodily Experiences of Gamete Donors

  • Rene Almeling
Chapter

Abstract

Donated eggs and sperm are key components of many modern-day fertility treatments. In the USA, egg and sperm donors are typically paid to produce gametes for anonymous recipients. In this chapter, I draw on 39 interviews with donors to examine women’s and men’s experiences of bodily commodification. Egg donors and sperm donors have different physical experiences of gamete donation; women must manage their bodies through shots and surgery, while men must engage in routine masturbation and abstinence. However, both egg and sperm donors offer insight into the embodied experience of donating sex cells for money and provide evidence that the social context in which physical experiences occur can produce variation in how the body feels.

Keywords

Bodily commodification Embodied experience Gamete donation Sperm donation 

Research Resources

  1. Rene Almeling, ‘Reproduction’, Annual Review of Sociology, 41 (2015), 423–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Rene Almeling, Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2011).Google Scholar
  3. Gay Becker, The Elusive Embryo: How Women and Men Approach New Reproductive Technologies (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ann V. Bell, Misconception: Social Class and Infertility in America (Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
  5. Anjani Chandra and Elizabeth Hervey Stephen, ‘Infertility Service Use Among U.S. Women: 1995 and 2002’, Fertility and Sterility, 93 (2010), 725–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sarah Franklin, Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception (London: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
  7. Carole Joffe and Jennifer Reich (eds), Reproduction and Society: Interdisciplinary Readings (London: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
  8. Thomas W. Laqueur, Solitary Sex: A Cultural History of Masturbation (New York: Zone Books, 2004).Google Scholar
  9. Edward Laumann, John Gagnon, Robert Michael, and Stuart Michaels, The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  10. Ellen Lewin, Gay Fatherhood: Narratives of Family and Citizenship in America (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Laura Mamo, Queering Reproduction: Achieving Pregnancy in the Age of Technoscience (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emily Martin, ‘The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles’, Signs, 16 (1991), 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Debora L. Spar, The Baby Business: How Money, Science, and Politics Drive the Commerce of Conception (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2006).Google Scholar
  14. Charis Thompson, Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005).Google Scholar
  15. United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report (Atlanta, GA: US Dept. of Health and Human Services, 2012): http://www.cdc.gov/art/pdf/2012-report/art-2012-fertility-clinic-report.pdf.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations