‘She Gets the Taunts and Bears the Blame’: Infertility in Contemporary India

  • Daniel J.R. GreyEmail author


This chapter provides a preliminary survey of infertility and its social context in present-day India. It aims to demonstrate and foreground the historical aspects of this issue, which are essential in order to understand how and why the Indian fertility industry has developed in the ways it has done, and why infertility remains in many respects a taboo subject. Drawing on English-language Indian newspapers, government reports, film, and literature, Grey shows how present-day attitudes and practices have their roots in policies and ideas originally generated during the late twentieth century. He explores the demographic context and population policies of India; reproductive medicine, adoption, and surrogacy; the social and cultural context of infertility; and religion. The chapter reveals how the profound stigmatization of infertility in contemporary India disproportionately affects women, regardless of faith, caste, region, or class background.


Adoption Population policies, Religion Reproductive medicine Surrogacy 

Research Resources

Primary Sources

    Official Publications

    1. Government of India Planning Commission, ‘5 Year Plans’:


    1. The Hindu Google Scholar
    2. Times of India Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Aditya Bharadwaj, ‘Sacred Conceptions: Clinical Theodicies, Uncertain Science, and Technologies of Procreation in India’, Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry, 30 (2006), 451–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aditya Bharadwaj and Peter Glasner, Local Cells, Global Science: The Rise of Embryonic Stem Cell Research in India (New York: Routledge, 2009).Google Scholar
  3. Swasti Bhattacharyya, Magical Progeny, Modern Technology: A Hindu Bioethics of Assisted Reproductive Technology (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2006).Google Scholar
  4. Lorraine Culley and Nicky Hudson, ‘“For Him, It’s Got to Be Your Own Son”: Adoption and Infertility in British South Asian Communities’, in Marilyn Cranshaw and Rachel Balen (eds), Adopting after Infertility: Messages from Practice, Research and Personal Experience (London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2010).Google Scholar
  5. Sayantani Dasgupta and Shamita Das Dasgupta (eds), Globalization and Transnational Surrogacy in India: Outsourcing Life (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2014).Google Scholar
  6. Holly Donahue Singh, ‘Aulad: Infertility and the Meanings of Children in North India’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Virginia, 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Sarah Hodges (ed.), Reproductive Health in India: History, Politics, Controversies (Delhi: Orient Longman, 2006).Google Scholar
  8. Marcia C. Inhorn and Aditya Bharadwaj, ‘Reproductively Disabled Lives: Infertility, Stigma, and Suffering in Egypt and India’, in Benedicte Ingstad and Susan Reynolds White (eds), Disability in Local and Global Worlds (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2007), 78–106.Google Scholar
  9. Monica Khanna Jhalani, Deconstructing Motherhood: Indian Cultural Narratives and Ideology, 1970s Onwards (New Delhi: SSS Publications, 2010).Google Scholar
  10. Catherine Kohler Riessman, ‘Stigma and Everyday Resistance Practices: Childless Women in South India’, Gender & Society, 14 (2000), 111–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Amrita Pande, Wombs in Labor: Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India (New York: Columbia University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
  12. Maya Unnithan, ‘Learning from Infertility: Gender, Health Inequities and Faith Healers in Women’s Experiences of Disrupted Reproduction in Rajasthan’, South Asian History and Culture, 1 (2010), 315–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rebecca Jane Williams, ‘Storming the Citadels of Poverty: Family Planning under the Emergency in India, 1975–1977’, Journal of Asian Studies, 73 (2014), 471–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plymouth UniversityPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations