Advertisement

Elites or Leadership? Opposite or Complementary Paradigms?

  • Jean Blondel
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses the relationship between elite theory and leadership theory. After having highlighted some of the historical reasons for the birth of elite theory, it continues to discuss the different perspective on politics shared by the studies of leadership initiated by Max Weber and the growing importance of their key concept in contemporary times. It addresses then the question to what extent it is possible to overcome the apparent lack of dialogue between the two paradigms and find a fruitful integration between them.

References

  1. Barber, J. D. (1972). The Presidential Characters. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Bendix, R. (1960). Max Weber. An Intellectual Portrait. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  3. Best, H., & Higley, J. (Eds.). (2010). Democratic Elitism: New Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  4. Blondel, J. (1987). Political Leadership. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Blondel, J. (2015). The Presidential Republic. Houndmills: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daloz, J.-P. (2003). Reflections on the Comparative Study of Political Leadership. In H. Baldersheim & J.-P. Daloz (Eds.), Political Leadership in a Global Age: The Experience of France and Norway (pp. 17–33). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  7. Femia, J., Körösényi, A., & Slomp, G. (Eds.). (2015). Political Leadership in Liberal and Democratic Theory. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  8. Field, G. L., & Higley, J. (1980). Elitism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  9. Foley, M. (2013). Political Leadership: Themes, Contexts, and Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goethals, G. R., & Sorenson, G. J. (2006). The Quest for a General Theory of Leadership. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hart, P., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Helms, L. (Ed.). (2012). Comparative Political Leadership. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  13. Higley, J. (2010). Elites’ Illusions about Democracy? In H. Best & J. Higley (Eds.), Democratic Elitism: New Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives (pp. 79–95). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  14. Higley, J., & Burton, M. (2006). Elite Foundations of Liberal Democracy. Boulder: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  15. Higley, J., & Gunther, R. (Eds.). (1992). Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hyden, G. (2006). Africa Politics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jackson, R. H., & Rosberg, C. G. (1982). Personal Rule in Black Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lynch, J. (1992). Caudillos in Spanish America: 1800–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). The Communist Manifesto. London: Communistischer Arbeiterbildungsverein.Google Scholar
  20. McGregor Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  21. Michels, R. (1911). Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der modernen Demokratie. Untersuchungen über die oligarchischen Tendenzen des Gruppenlebens. Leipzig: Werner Klinkhardt.Google Scholar
  22. Mosca, G. (1883). Sulla teorica dei governi e sul governo parlamentare. Palermo: Tipografia dello statuto.Google Scholar
  23. Pareto, V. (1916). Trattato di sociologia generale. Firenze: Barbera.Google Scholar
  24. Poguntke, T., & Webb, P. (2005). The Presidentialization of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sartori, G. (1987). Democratic Theory Revisited. Chatham: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  26. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
  27. Weber, M. (1922). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr. English edition: Economy and Society. New York: Bedminster Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  28. Willner, A. R. (1984). The Spellbinders: Charismatic Political Leadership. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Blondel
    • 1
  1. 1.European University InstituteFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations