Advertisement

Analyses of Elite Networks

  • Franziska Barbara Keller
Chapter

Abstract

Social network analysis (SNA) provides important tools and methods for researchers of political elites on four issues: elite interactions, identifying elite groups and their social structure, measuring elite power, and defining elites. Researchers can examine different factors influencing interactions among elites while properly accounting for the interdependent nature of such data using exponential random graph models (ERGMs) and stochastic actor-based models (SOAMs). Visualizations and community-finding algorithms allow the detection of groups, core members, cleavages, and polarization/fractionalization in this interaction network. Powerful elites can be identified through centrality measures, which also help distinguish between different types of influence. SNA research on nomination networks and on sampling in networks, particularly on more principled snowball-sampling methods, could help expose biases in the way researchers determine whom to include in their study.

References

  1. Bastian M., Heymann S., & Jacomy M. (2009). Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. Presented at the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, North America.Google Scholar
  2. Berardo, R., & Scholz, J. T. (2010). Self-Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection, and Cooperation in Estuaries. American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 632–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Christenson, D. P., & Hitt, M. P. (2013). Quality Over Quantity: Amici Influence and Judicial Decision Making. American Political Science Review, 107(3), 446–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burt, R. S. (1995). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Carpenter, D. P., Esterling, K. M., & Lazer, D. M. J. (2004). Friends, Brokers, and Transitivity: Who Informs Whom in Washington Politics? Journal of Politics, 66(1), 224–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll, W. K., & Sapinski, J. P. (2010). The Global Corporate Elite and the Transnational Policy-Planning Network, 1996–2006. International Sociology, 25(4), 501–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cranmer, S. J., & Desmarais, B. A. (2011). Inferential Network Analysis with Exponential Random Graph Models. Political Analysis, 19(1), 66–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Desmarais, B. A., Moscardelli, V. G., Schaffner, B. F., & Kowal, M. S. (2015a). Measuring Legislative Collaboration: The Senate Press Events Network. Social Networks, 40(1), 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Desmarais, B. A., La Raja, R. J., & Kowal, M. S. (2015b). The Fates of Challengers in U.S. House Elections: The Role of Extended Party Networks in Supporting Candidates and Shaping Electoral Outcomes. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 194–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Domhoff, G. W. (1990). The Power Elite and the State: How Policy Is Made in America. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  11. Easter, G. M. (1996). Personal Networks and Postrevolutionary State Building: Soviet Russia Reexamined. World Politics, 48(04), 551–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Etzion, D., & Davis, G. F. (2008). Revolving Doors? A Network Analysis of Corporate Officers and US Government Officials. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(3), 157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faulkner, R. R., & Cheney, E. (2013). Breakdown of Brokerage. Crisis and Collapse in the Watergate Conspiracy. In C. Morselli (Ed.), Crime and Networks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Faust, K., Willert, K. E., Rowlee, D. D., & Skvoretz, J. (2002). Scaling and Statistical Models for Affiliation Networks: Patterns of Participation Among Soviet Politicians During the Brezhnev Era. Social Networks, 24(3), 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernandez, R. M., & Gould, R. V. (1994). A Dilemma of State Power: Brokerage and Influence in the National Health Policy Domain. The American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1455–1491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischer, M., & Sciarini, P. (2015). Unpacking Reputational Power: Intended and Unintended Determinants of the Assessment of Actors’ Power. Social Networks, 42, 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer, M., & Sciarini, P. (2016). Drivers of Collaboration in Political Decision Making: A Cross-Sector Perspective. The Journal of Politics, 78(1), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the Value of Political Connections. The American Economic Review, 91(4), 1095–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fowler, J. H. (2006a). Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks. Political Analysis, 14(4), 456–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fowler, J. H. (2006b). Legislative Cosponsorship Networks in the US House and Senate. Social Networks, 28(4), 454–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gile, K. J. (2011). Improved Inference For Respondent-Driven Sampling Data with Application to HIV Prevalence Estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(493), 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grossmann, M. (2013). The Variable Politics of the Policy Process: Issue-Area Differences and Comparative Networks. The Journal of Politics, 75(1), 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Hidden Populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 174–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heinz, J. P., Laumann, E. O., Salisbury, R. H., & Nelson, R. L. (1990). Inner Circles or Hollow Cores? Elite Networks in National Policy Systems. Journal of Politics, 52(2), 356–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Higley, J., & Moore, G. (1981). Elite Integration in the United States and Australia. American Political Science Review, 75(3), 581–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Higley, J., Hoffmann-Lange, U., Kadushin, C., & Moore, G. (1991). Elite Integration in Stable Democracies: A Reconsideration. European Sociological Review, 7(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoffmann-Lange, U. (2007). Methods of Elite Research. In R. J. Dalton & H. D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hunter, F. (1953). Community Power Structure. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  30. Keller, F. B. (2015). Networks of Power. Using Social Network Analysis to Understand Who Will Rule and Who Is Really in Charge in an Authoritarian Regime. Theory, Method, and Application on Chinese Communist Elites (1982–2012). PhD Dissertation, New York University. [Online] Available on: http://gradworks.umi.com/37/40/3740801.html
  31. Keller, F. B. (2016a). Moving Beyond Factions: Using Social Network Analysis to Uncover Patronage Networks among Chinese Elites. Journal of East Asian Studies, 16(1), 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keller, F. B. (2016b). Uncovering Authoritarian Hierarchies Using Career Paths and Network Measures. Presented at the Annual General Conference of the European Political Science Association, 24 June.Google Scholar
  33. Keller, F. B., & Wang, Y. (2015). Farewell Comrades! Power Struggle and Elite Removal in Single-Party Authoritarian Regimes. Presented at the Annual Convention of the American Political Science Association, 5 September.Google Scholar
  34. Knoke, D. (1994a). Political Networks: The Structural Perspective (Vol. 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Knoke, D. (1994b). Networks of Elite Structure and Decision Making. In S. Wasserman & J. Galaskiewicz (Eds.), Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Knoke, D., Pappi, F. U., Broadbent, J., & Tsujinaka, Y. (1996). Comparing Policy Networks – Labor Politics in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Krackhardt, D. (1987). QAP Partialling as a Test of Spuriousness. Social Networks, 9(2), 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Laumann, E. O., & Knoke, D. (1987). The Organizational State. Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  39. Laumann, E. O., & Pappi, F. U. (1976). Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence Systems. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Laumann, E. O., Marsden, P. V., & Prensky, D. (1989). The Boundary Specification Problem in Network Analysis. In L. C. Freeman, D. R. White, & A. K. Romney (Eds.), Research Methods in Social Network Analysis. Fairfax: George Mason University.Google Scholar
  41. Lusher, D., Koskinen, J., & Robbins, G. (2013). Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Mahdavi, P. (2014). Google Correlations: New Approaches to Collecting Data for Statistical Network Analysis. Presented at the Annual Conference of the American Political Science Associationl, September 2014.Google Scholar
  43. Metz, T., & Jäckle, S. (2016). Hierarchical, Decentralized, or Something Else? Opposition Networks in the German Bundestag. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 41(2), 501–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mills, C. W. (1956). The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Moody, J., & Mucha, J. P. (2013). Portrait of Political Party Polarization. Network Science, 1(1), 119–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moore, G. (1979). The Structure of a National Elite Network. American Sociological Review, 44(5), 673–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Osei, A. (2015). Elites and Democracy in Ghana: A Social Network Approach. African Affairs, 114(457), 529–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Padgett, J. F., & Ansell, C. K. (1993). Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1259–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Parigi, P., & Sartori, L. (2014). The Political Party as a Network of Cleavages: Disclosing the Inner Structure of Italian Political Parties in the Seventies. Social Networks, 36, 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shih, V., Adolph, C., & Liu, M. (2012). Getting Ahead in the Communist Party: Explaining the Advancement of Central Committee Members in China. American Political Science Review, 106(1), 166–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Snijders, T. A. B., Van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to Stochastic Actor-Based Models for Network Dynamics. Social Networks, 32(1), 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Useem, M. (1984). The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the US and UK. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Van Gunten, T. S. (2016). Cohesion, Consensus, and Conflict: Technocratic Elites and Financial Crisis in Mexico and Argentina. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 56(5), 1–25.Google Scholar
  54. Ward, M., Stovel, K., & Sacks, A. (2011). Network Analysis and Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Woldense, J. (2016). The Ruler’s Game of Musical Chairs: Shuffling and Ethiopia’s Last Emperor. Presented at the Annual Convention of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 2016.Google Scholar
  56. Wu, C.-Y., & Knoke, D. (2013). Policy Network Models. In E. Araral, S. Fritzen, M. Howlett, M. Ramesh, & X. Wu (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Policy. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Franziska Barbara Keller
    • 1
  1. 1.Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyClear Water BayHong Kong

Personalised recommendations