Male-Led Science Fiction Blockbusters: Performing “Faster, More Intense”

  • Daniel Smith-Rowsey
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Screen Industries and Performance book series (PSSIP)


Smith-Rowsey counters decades of conventional wisdom by arguing that performances in seminal blockbusters are not “bad” but instead entirely appropriate to certain popular narratives. In the genre of science fiction, ostensibly “bad” performances are shown to emphasize both the theme of men opposing/confronting machines as well as the (monomythic) theme of a rookie/protégé learning from a master, as in this chapter’s three case studies, Star Wars (1977), Back to the Future (1985), and The Matrix (1999). Smith-Rowsey deconstructs George Lucas’ (perhaps apocryphal) singular on-set advice to actors: “O.K., same thing, only better,” and “Faster, more intense.” Smith-Rowsey also performs a limited “commutation test” comparing Eric Stoltz and Michael J. Fox in the role of Marty McFly. Finally, the author explains why the famously under-praised Keanu Reeves was a better fit for Neo than a more lauded actor such as, say, Sean Penn or Christian Bale.


  1. Back to the Future. Directed by Robert Zemeckis, 1985. Universal City: Universal Home Video, 2010. DVD.Google Scholar
  2. Cornea, Christine. “2-D Performance and the Re-Animated Actor in Science Fiction,” in Genre and Performance: Film and Television, edited by Christine Cornea, 148–165. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  3. Gaines, Caseen. We Don’t Need Roads: The Making of the Back to the Future Trilogy. New York: Plume Books, 2015.Google Scholar
  4. Hyden, Steven, Sean O’Neal, Tasha Robinson, and Scott Tobias. “Inventory: 13 Movies Featuring Magical Black Men.” The Onion A.V. Club, Mar. 4, 2007, n.p. Accessed October 12, 2016.
  5. Johnston, Keith. Science Fiction Film. New York: Berg Publishers, 2013.Google Scholar
  6. Laban, Rudolf. The Mastery of Movement. 4th Edition. London: Pre Textos, 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Lyden, John. “Apocalyptic Determinism and Star Wars,” in Culture, Identities, and Technology in the Star Wars Films: Essays on the Two Trilogies, edited by Carl Silvio and Tony M. Vinci, 34–52. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, 2007.Google Scholar
  8. The Matrix. Directed by The Wachowski Brothers, 1999. Burbank: Warner Bros. Home Video, 1999. DVD.Google Scholar
  9. Pearson, Roberta. “A Star Performs: Mr. March, Mr. Mason, and Mr. Maine,” in Screen Acting, edited by Alan Lovell and Peter Krämer, 59–74. London: Routledge Books, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. Pearson, Roberta, and Máire Messenger Davies. Star Trek and American Television. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  11. Pett, Emma. “‘Hey! Hey! I’ve Seen This One. It’s a Classic’: Nostalgia, Repeat Viewing, and Cult Performance in Back to the Future.” Participations 10, no. 1 (May 2013): 177–197.Google Scholar
  12. Punnoose, Nikhil George. “Principles of Film Editing in the Matrix.” Personal Blog, Apr. 13, 2010. Accessed October 12, 2016.
  13. Rutsky, R.L. “Being Keanu,” in The End of Cinema as We Know It, edited by Jon Lewis. New York: New York University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  14. Seabrook, John. “Why Is the Force Still with Us?” The New Yorker, Jan. 6, 1997, n.p. Accessed October 12, 2016.
  15. Smith-Rowsey, Daniel. “Back in Time Yet of His Time: Marty McFly as a Teenage Boy Role Model.” Boyhood Studies 9.1 (2016).Google Scholar
  16. Star Wars. Directed by George Lucas, 1977. Los Angeles: 20th Century Fox Home Video, 2005. Special Collector’s Edition DVD.Google Scholar
  17. Taylor, Charles. “Something in the Way He Moves: In Defense of Keanu Reeves.” Salon, Apr. 29, 1999, n.p. Accessed October 12, 2016. (5/25/00).
  18. Vogler, Chris. The Writer’s Journey. New York: Pan Books, 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Smith-Rowsey
    • 1
  1. 1.Saint Mary’s College of CaliforniaMoragaUSA

Personalised recommendations