Historical Epic Blockbusters: Are You Not Entertained … By Actors?

  • Daniel Smith-Rowsey
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Screen Industries and Performance book series (PSSIP)


Smith-Rowsey opens his investigation into blockbuster performances with a close look at the genre that, more than any other, diminished the reputation of the initial blockbuster cycle (of the 1950s and 1960s) because of what were often considered “ham-fisted,” “declamatory,” “histrionic,” or simply “bad” performances. Prompted by Vivian Sobchack’s famous essay about “surge and splendor” in the historical epic, Smith-Rowsey asks if audiences want performers to fit in with their films’ pomp and circumstance, or if audiences rely upon relatively nuanced performances to mitigate against a production’s excesses. Smith-Rowsey finds that in Gladiator (2000), Sobchack’s performative “magnitude” is both appropriate and achieved given the film’s (and sub-genre’s) prioritization of size and scale. However, the author finds that in Titanic (1997), more understated, “heritage film”-style performances well suit that epic’s melodrama. Research shows that preview audiences for Titanic, importuned to suggest cuts, preferred that the film trim the ship-sinking scenes and preserve the quieter love scenes. The idea that blockbuster audiences prefer “acting” over “action” runs counter to most film criticism and scholarship.


  1. Clarke, James. The Cinema of James Cameron: Bodies in Heroic Motion. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  2. Cyrino, Monica. “Gladiator and Contemporary American Society,” in Gladiator: Film and History, edited by Martin Winkler, 124–149. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar
  3. Gladiator. Directed by Ridley Scott, 2000. Los Angeles: DreamWorks Home Video, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. Griffin, Nancy. “James Cameron is the Scariest Man in Hollywood.” Esquire, December 1997.Google Scholar
  5. Keller, Alexandra. James Cameron. London: Routledge Books, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Laban, Rudolf. The Mastery of Movement. 4th Edition. London: Pre Textos, 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Mulholland Dr. Directed by David Lynch, 2001. Universal City: Universal Pictures Home Video, 2015. DVD.Google Scholar
  8. Ncoles. “The Top 10 Celebrities with Deformities.” Spike, June 1, 2009. Accessed October 12, 2016.
  9. Nelmes, Jill. Introduction to Film Studies. 5th Edition. New York: Routledge, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Redmond, Sean. “The Whiteness of Stars: Looking at Kate Winslet’s Unruly White Body,” in Stardom and Celebrity: A Reader, edited by Sean Redmond and Su Holmes, 263–274. London: Sage Publications, 2007.Google Scholar
  11. Sammon, Paul M. Ridley Scott: The Making of his Movies. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. Schwarzbuam, Lisa. “Gladiator: EW Review.” Entertainment Weekly, May 12, 2000. Accessed October 12, 2016.
  13. Sobchack, Vivian. “‘Surge and Splendor’: A Phenomenology of the Hollywood Historical Epic.” Representations 29 (Winter 1990): 24–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. THR Staff. “Hollywood’s 100 Favorite Movie Quotes.” Hollywood Reporter, Feb. 24, 2016. Accessed October 12, 2016.
  15. Titanic. Directed by James Cameron, 1997. Los Angeles: Paramount Home Video, Special Collector’s Edition DVD, 2005.Google Scholar
  16. Vidal, Belén. Heritage Film: Nation, Genre, and Representation. London: Wallflower Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  17. Williams, Linda. Playing the Race Card: Melodramas of Black and White from Uncle Tom to O.J. Simpson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Smith-Rowsey
    • 1
  1. 1.Saint Mary’s College of CaliforniaMoragaUSA

Personalised recommendations