Advertisement

Amateur Theatre, Place and Place-Making

  • Helen Nicholson
  • Nadine Holdsworth
  • Jane Milling
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter analyses how amateur theatre contributes to making places and building communities. Building on ideas about the cultural value of amateur theatre raised in Chap.  2, this chapter traces the historical connection between amateur theatre and the utopian vision of the Garden City Movement, where amateur theatre was seen as a mechanism of social integration in newly constructed towns. The chapter revisits the first two Garden Cities, Letchworth and Welwyn Garden City, to raise questions about how far, and in what ways, this idealism remains in today’s amateur theatre companies. Moving the debate to productions in London’s suburbs and in Norwich, the chapter examines questions of social exclusion and community, arguing that an emotional attachment to amateur theatre-making creates a sense of place and belonging.

Keywords

Place Community Place-making Garden cities Suburbia Belonging 

References

  1. Balme, Christopher B. 2014. The Theatrical Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauman, Zigmunt. 2003. Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2005. Liquid Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brunt, A.W. 1942. The Pageant of Letchworth. Letchworth: Letchworth Printers.Google Scholar
  5. Casey, Edward. 1996. How to Get from Space to Place in a Fairly Short Stretch of Time. In Senses of Place, ed. S. Feld and K.H. Basso, 13–52. Santa Fe: School of American Research.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1997. The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cockin, Katharine. 1998. Edith Craig (1869–1847): Dramatic Lives. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  8. Cresswell, Tim. 2004. Place: A Short Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2006. On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Edensor, Tim, Deborah Leslie, Steve Millington, and Norma M. Rantisi, eds. 2010. Spaces of Vernacular Creativity: Rethinking the Cultural Economy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Florida, Richard. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Geoghegan, Hilary. 2013. Emotional Geographies of Enthusiasm: Belonging to the Telecommunications Heritage Group. Area 45: 40–46.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2012.01128.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gray, Cara. 2017. A Study of Amateur Theatre: Making and Making-Do. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Royal Holloway, University of London.Google Scholar
  14. Hawkins, Harriet. 2017. Creativity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Howard, Ebenezer. 1902. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Sonnenschein & Co.Google Scholar
  16. Howard, Pamela. 2009. What Is Scenography? 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Hunt, Tristram. 2004. Building Jerusalem: The Rise and Fall of the Victorian City. London: Phoenix Paperback.Google Scholar
  18. Huq, Rupa. 2013. On the Edge: The Contested Cultures of English Suburbia. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  19. Lee, Jennie. 1965. A Policy for the Arts: The First Steps. http://action.labour.org.uk/page/-/blog%20images/policy_for_the_arts.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2016.
  20. Lees, Loretta, ed. 2004. The Emancipatory City? London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Lefebvre, Henri. 2014. Toward an Architecture of Enjoyment. Trans. R. Bononno. Minneapolis: Minneapolis University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Light, Alison. 1991. Forever England: Femininity, Literature and Conservativism Between the Wars. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Lippard, Lucy. 1997. The Lure of the Local: Senses of Place in a Multicentred Society. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  24. Massey, Doreen. 2005. For Space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Matless, David. 1998. Landscape and Englishness. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  26. Meacham, Standish. 1999. Regaining Paradise: Englishness and the Early Garden City Movement. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Modood, Tariq. 2013. Multiculturalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Penny, Sarah, and Cara Gray. 2017. The Materialities of Amateur Theatre. In Contemporary Theatre Review 27 (1): 104–123.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2016.1262850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Purdom, C.B. 1908. Letchworth Dramatic Society: The First Annual Report (1907–1908). London: J.M. Dent.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 1951. Life Over Again. London: J.M. Dent and Sons.Google Scholar
  31. Purdom, C.B., and Charles Lee. 1910. The Second Garden City Pantomime. Letchworth: Dent Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Samuel, Raphael. 1994. Theatres of Memory Vol. 1 Past and Present in Contemporary Culture. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, Laurajane. 2011. The ‘Doing’ of Heritage: Heritage as Performance. In Performing Heritage: Research, Practice and Innovation in Museum Theatre and Live Interpretation, ed. Anthony Jackson and Jenny Kidd, 69–81. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  34. The Office for National Statistics, Taking Part. www.gov.uk/government/collections/sat%2D%2D2. Accessed 13 Oct 2016.
  35. Turner, Cathy. 2015. Dramaturgy and Architecture: Theatre, Utopia and the Built Environment. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Twydell, Dave. 2011. Mr. Fothergill to Lark Rise: Harefield Amateur Dramatic Society 1951–2011. Harefield: Harefield Amateur Dramatic Society.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen Nicholson
    • 1
  • Nadine Holdsworth
    • 2
  • Jane Milling
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Drama, Theatre and DanceRoyal Holloway, University of LondonEghamUK
  2. 2.School of Theatre and Performance StudiesUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
  3. 3.Department of DramaUniversity of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations