Advertisement

Ecologies of Amateur Theatre

  • Helen Nicholson
  • Nadine Holdsworth
  • Jane Milling
Chapter

Abstract

The opening chapter introduces debates about amateur theatre that frame the book. It argues that amateur theatre is frequently unrecognised as part of the cultural ecology of contemporary theatre, and yet it is a significant aspect of many people’s cultural and creative lives and at the heart of many communities. By describing amateur theatre in ecological terms, that chapter opens questions about its processes and practices as a multifaceted field of cultural production. It argues that an ecology of practices recognises the shared knowledge and know-how that amateurs possess, the friendships and informal networks that it inspires, the ways in which it shapes lives, defines communities and contributes to place-making. The chapter makes the case for the study of amateur theatre as ‘feeling-work’, an empathetic study that, whilst alert to its tensions and contradictions, brings an act of cultural recognition to an overlooked area of creative participation. Identifying the renewed interest in the amateur in the twenty-first century, the chapter raises questions about the place of amateur theatre in the contemporary amateur turn.

Keywords

Amateur theatre Amateur turn Cultural value Amateur creativity 

References

  1. Bishop, Claire. 2012. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Coates, David. 2017. A Whistle-Stop Tour of Amateur Theatricals in Nineteenth Century Britain. www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRFMxKn5oR8. Accessed 27 Dec 2017.
  3. Cochrane, Claire. 2001. ‘The Pervasiveness of the Commonplace’: The Historian and Amateur Theatre. Theatre Research International 26 (3): 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2011. Twentieth Century British Theatre Industry, Art and Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen-Cruz, Jan. 2005. Local Acts: Community-Based Performance in the United States. New Brunswick/London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2010. Engaging Performance: Theatre as Call and Response. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Crossick, Geoffrey, and Patrycja Kaszynska. 2016. Understanding the Value of Arts and Culture: The AHRC Cultural Value Project. London: Arts and Humanities Research Council.Google Scholar
  8. Dobson, Michael. 2011. Shakespeare and Amateur Performance: A Cultural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Finnegan, Ruth. 2007. The Hidden Musicians: Music-Making in an English Town. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Flynn, Molly. 2017. Amateur Hour: Culture, Capital, and the Royal Shakespeare Company’s Open Stages Initiative. RiDE: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 22 (4): 482–499.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2017.1358082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gray, Cara. 2017. A Study of Amateur Theatre: Making and Making-Do. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Royal Holloway, University of London.Google Scholar
  12. Hawley, Judith, and Mary Isbell, eds. 2012. Amateur Theatre Studies: Nineteenth Century Theatre and Film. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Holdsworth, Nadine, Jane Milling, and Helen Nicholson. 2017. Theatre, Performance, and the Amateur Turn. Contemporary Theatre Review 27 (1): 4–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2017.1266229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hurley, Erin. 2010. Theatre & Feeling. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingold, Tim, and Elizabeth Hallam. 2007. Creativity and Cultural Improvisation. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  16. Jackson, Shannon. 2011. Social Works: Performing Art, Supporting Publics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jeffers, Alison, and Gerri Moriarty. 2017. Culture, Democracy and the Right to Make Art: The British Community Arts Movement. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kershaw, Baz. 1992. The Politics of Performance: Radical Theatre as Cultural Intervention. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2007. Theatre Ecologies: Environments and Performance Events. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kings College London. 2017. Towards Cultural Democracy: Promoting Cultural Capabilities for Everyone. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/Cultural/-/Projects/Towards-cultural-democracy.aspx. Accessed 4 Aug 2017.
  21. Knott, Stephen. 2015. Amateur Craft: History and Theory. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lowerson, John. 2005. Amateur Operatics: A Social and Cultural History. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mangan, Michael. 2010. The Theatre in Modern British Culture. In The Cambridge Companion to Modern British Culture, ed. Michael Higgins, Clarissa Smith, and John Storey, 154–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matarasso, Francois. 2012. Where We Dream: West Bromwich Operatic Society & the Fine Art of Musical Theatre. West Bromwich: A Multistory Publication.Google Scholar
  25. Nicholson, Helen. 2014. Applied Drama: The Gift of Theatre. Second ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ———. 2015. Absent Amateurs. RiDE: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 20 (3): 263–266.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2015.1059262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pellecchia, Diego. 2017. Noh Creativity? The Role of Amateurs in Japanese Noh Theatre. Contemporary Theatre Review 27 (1): 34–45.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2016.1262848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Penny, Sarah. 2016. Crossing the Line. Performance Research 21 (2): 32–37.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2016.1162524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Perry, Grayson. 2012. All in the Best Possible Taste with Grayson Perry. Channel 4 TV, June 5.Google Scholar
  30. Pink, Sarah. 2009. Doing Sensory Ethnography. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Portelli, Alessandro. 1998. What Makes Oral History Different. In The Oral History Reader, ed. Robert Perks and Alistair Thomson, 63–74. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Ridout, Nicholas. 2013. Passionate Amateurs: Theatre, Communism, and Love. Ann Arbour: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  33. Rugoff, Ralph. 2008. Other Experts. In Amateurs, 9–14. California: California College of the Arts.Google Scholar
  34. Shaughnessy, Nicola. 2012. Applying Performance: Live Art, Socially Engaged Theatre and Affective Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stebbins, Robert A. 1979. Amateurs: On the Margins Between Work and Leisure. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 1992. Amateurs, Professionals and Serious Leisure. Montreal: McGill and Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2007. Serious Leisure. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Stengers, Isabel. 2005. Introductory Notes on an Ecology of Practices. Cultural Studies Review 11 (1): 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thompson, James. 2009. Performance Affects: Applied Theatre and the End of Effect. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walcon, Erin, and Helen Nicholson. 2017. The Sociable Aesthetics of Amateur Theatre. Contemporary Theatre Review 27 (1): 18–33.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2016.1262851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wetherell, Margaret. 2012. Affect and Emotion. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  42. Wolf, Stacy. 2017. ‘The Hills Are Alive with the Sound of Music’: Musical Theatre at Girls’ Jewish Summer Camps in Maine, USA. Contemporary Theatre Review 27 (1): 46–60.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2016.1262853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen Nicholson
    • 1
  • Nadine Holdsworth
    • 2
  • Jane Milling
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Drama, Theatre and DanceRoyal Holloway, University of LondonEghamUK
  2. 2.School of Theatre and Performance StudiesUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
  3. 3.Department of DramaUniversity of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations