The Creative Process in Lead Sheet Composition
Popular songs have arguably a huge impact on society. It is therefore legitimate to investigate the nature of the creative act underlying popular song composition. Ethnographic experiments in song composition are difficult to conduct. This chapter describes an experiment addressing the role of feedback in the lead sheet composition process. To what extent can peer feedback affect the quality of a music composition? How does musical experience influence the quality of feedback during the song composition process? Participants compose short songs using an online lead sheet editor, and are given the possibility to provide feedback on other participants’ songs. Feedback can either be accepted or rejected in a later step. Quantitative data were collected from this experiment that can be used to estimate the relation between the intrinsic quality of songs (estimated by peer evaluation) and the nature of feedback. Results show that peer feedback can indeed improve both the quality of a song composition and the composer’s satisfaction about it. Also, composers tend to prefer compositions from other musicians with similar musical experience levels.
KeywordsMusic composition Creative process Peer feedback Composition quality Lead sheet Online lead sheet editor Song
This research was conducted within the Flow-Machines project funded by the ERC under the European Union’s 7th Framework Programme (FP/2007–2013)/ERC Grant Agreement n. 291156, and by the Praise project (EU FP7 number 388770), a collaborative project funded by the European Commission under program FP7-ICT-2011-8.
- Ahren, T. (2015, 10). Versions, variants, and the performatives of the score: Traces of performances in the texts of Anton Webern’s music. Retrieved from http://medias.ircam.fr/xc1449e.
- Collins, D. (2012). The act of musical composition: Studies in the creative process. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Donin, N. (2016). Domesticating gesture: The collaborative creative process of Florence Baschet’s StreicherKreis for ‘augmented’ string quartet (2006–2008). In E. Clarke & M. Doffman (Eds.), Creativity, improvisation and collaboration: Perspectives on the performance of contemporary music. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Pachet, F. (2011). Hit song science. In Tao, Tzanetakis, & Ogihara (Eds.), Music data mining (pp. 305–326). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. Google Scholar
- Pachet, F., & Diran, C. (2014). Marie-claire. http://www.cdbaby.com/AlbumDetails.aspx?AlbumID=marieclaire.
- Pachet, F., & d’Inverno, M. (2014). Count on it. http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/markdinvernoquintet?SourceCode=widgetbaby.
- Pachet, F., Suzda, J., & Martín, D. (2013, November). A comprehensive online database of machine-readable lead sheets for jazz standards. In ISMIR (pp. 275–280). Curitiba (Brazil). Google Scholar
- Salavuo, M. (2006, 11). Open and informal online communities as forums of collaborative musical activities and learning. British Journal of Music Education, 23, 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265051706007042.
- September, O. (2013). Behind the scenes with MOOCs: Berklee college of music’s experience developing, running, and evaluating. Continuing Higher Education Review, 77, 137.Google Scholar
- Settles, B., & Dow, S. (2013). Let’s get together: The formation and success of online creative collaborations. In Proceedings of the Sigchi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2009–2018).Google Scholar
- Urbano, J., Lloréns, J., Morato, J., & Sánchez-Cuadrado, S. (2011). Melodic similarity through shape similarity. In Exploring music contents (pp. 338–355). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar