Advertisement

Workers’ Participation at Plant Level: The South African Case

  • Edward WebsterEmail author
  • Themba Masondo
  • Christine Bischoff
Chapter

Abstract

We examine the attempt in a democratic South Africa to shift from an adversarial class struggle approach (with heavy racial overtones) toward a more participatory and cooperative industrial relations system based on workplace forums. We argue that the experiment failed because this attempt at institutional transfer from the successful system of German co-determination did not take sufficient account of the specific social and economic context of South Africa’s distinct industrial relations system. The majority of organized workers in South Africa have over the past three decades opted for engagement with employers on the basis of a union agenda and union independence in order to transform and democratize the workplace. At the center of this strategy has been the shop steward as the instrument for worker participation at plant level. However, our ethnographic account of participation at plant level suggests that workers feel disempowered and unable to significantly shape decision-making.

Keywords

South Africa industrial relations Worker participation Co-determination: shop stewards Economic democracy Volkswagen 

Bibliography

  1. Anstey, M. (1997). Employee Participation and Workplace Forums. Johannesburg: Juta and Company.Google Scholar
  2. Beynon, H. (1973). Working for Ford. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bradford, H. (1987). A Taste of Freedom: The ICU in Rural Africa, 1924–1930. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA). (2014). Workplace Forum Applications March 2011 to July 2014. Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  5. COSATU. (1997). Secretariat Report. COSATU 6th National Congress. Johannesburg: COSATU.Google Scholar
  6. Department of Labour. (2014). Workplace Forums. Available from https://www.labour.gov.za/DOL/legislation/acts/basic-guides/basic-guide-to-workplace-forums. Accessed 19 Sep 2014.
  7. Du Toit, D. (1997). Industrial Democracy in South Africa’s Transition. Law, Development and Democracy, 1(1), 39–68.Google Scholar
  8. Friedman, S. (1987). Building Tomorrow Today: African Workers in Trade Unions, 1970–1984. Johannesburg: Ravan Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hyman, R. (1975). Industrial Relations: A Marxist Introduction. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lewis, J. (1978). The New Unionism. In E. Webster (Ed.), Essays in Southern African Labour History. Johannesburg: Ravan Press.Google Scholar
  11. Maller, J. (1992). Conflict and Co-operation. Johannesburg: Ravan.Google Scholar
  12. Masondo, D. (2003). Trade Liberalization and the Restructuring of Work in Post Apartheid South Africa: A Case Study of BMW. Unpublished MA Thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Masondo, T. (2010). Worker Participation in an Auto Assembly Plant. Research Report. Master of Arts, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  14. Masondo, T. (2012). The Sociology of Upward Social Mobility Among COSATU Shop Stewards. In S. Buhlungu & M. Tshoaedi (Eds.), COSATU’s Contested Legacy. Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
  15. Masondo, T., Orkin, M., & Webster, E. (2015). Militants or Managers? COSATU and Democracy in the Workplace. In R. Southall & V. Satgar (Eds.), COSATU and the Crisis in Labour in South Africa. Sandton: KMM Review Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. National Labour & Economic Development Institute (NALEDI). (2012). Report on the Findings of the COSATU Workers’ Survey. Johannesburg: NALEDI.Google Scholar
  17. National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (NUMSA). (2000). Resolutions Adopted at the Sixth National Congress Held on 20–24th August 2000 at the Mmabatho Convention Centre, Mahikeng. Johannesburg: NUMSA.Google Scholar
  18. National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (NUMSA). (2004). Resolutions from the Seventh National Congress. Johannesburg: Archives at the Cullen Library, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  19. O’Meara, D. (1975). The 1946 Mine Workers’ Strike’. Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 146–173.Google Scholar
  20. Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Psoulis, C., Moleme, K., Spratt, J., & Ryan, E. (1999). Workplace Forums: What Is their Future? Labour Studies Research Report 9. Johannesburg: Sociology of Work Unit, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  22. Republic of South Africa. (1995, February 10). Government Gazette, No. 16259.Google Scholar
  23. Society, Work and Development Institute (SWOP). (2009). Notes from the NUMSA Central Committee on the Preliminary Findings of the Production Systems Research Project on Changes in Production Systems and Work Methods. Meeting held on 27th July 2009, Cedar Park Hotel, Johannesburg. Johannesburg: NUMSA.Google Scholar
  24. Webster, E. (1975). Management’s Counter Offensive. South African Labour Bulletin, 2(3), 29–39.Google Scholar
  25. Webster, E. (1985). Cast in Racial Mould: Labour Process and Trade Unionism in the Foundries. Johannesburg: Ravan.Google Scholar
  26. Webster, E. (1996). Changing Workplace Industrial Relations in South Africa. In R. Lessem & B. Nassbaum (Eds.), Sawubona Africa: Embracing Four Worlds in South African Management. Wynberg: Zebra Press.Google Scholar
  27. Webster, E. (2001). Manufacturing Compromise: The Dynamics of Race and Class among South African Shop Stewards in the 1990s. In R. Baldoz, R. Kpeber, & P. Craft (Eds.), The Critical Study of Work: Labour Technology and Global Production. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Webster, E., Macun, I., & Joffe, A. (1995). Negotiating Organisational Change in the South African Workplace. Johannesburg: Sociology of Work Unit, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  29. Webster, E., Masondo, T., Mashilo, A., & Bischoff, C. (2009). Changes in Production Systems and Work Methods: A Report on Work Restructuring in the Auto and Components Sector: The Opportunities, Benefits, and Dilemmas Facing NUMSA. Johannesburg: Society, Work and Development Institute, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward Webster
    • 1
    Email author
  • Themba Masondo
    • 2
  • Christine Bischoff
    • 3
  1. 1.Society, Work and Development Institute, Southern Centre for Inequality StudiesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  3. 3.Wits City InstituteUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations