Advertisement

Workers’ Participation: Comparative Historical Perspectives from the Nineteenth Century to the End of the Cold War

  • Stefan BergerEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Stefan Berger opens with a historical view on workers’ participation at plant level in a comparative perspective. Berger questions the ‘Varieties of Capitalism (VOC)’ approach (Hall and Soskice. Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001) as an explanatory tool to understand varieties of workers’ representation. He argues that a multifactor explanation is necessary to understand the relative success or failure of models of social partnership. These factors include characteristics of the state but also the political culture and the influence of ideas, values, and norms. This he illustrates by reconstructing historical trajectories from the first half of the twentieth century via the era of the Cold War toward the 1980s. He distinguishes between the authoritarian traditions of, for example, formerly fascist Germany, Italy, and Spain, and the liberal traditions of the US, UK, and Australia as well as the Nordic models. While the idea of a ‘social partnership’ came to fruition in Western Europe after the Second World War, the varying political cultures, state systems, and established norms and values in European societies contributed to different developments of the participation of workers. Before 1945, the traditions of social liberalism and social Catholicism played a greater role than in the second half of the century. Prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, the idea of promoting ‘capitalism with a human face’ and ‘social partnership’ were more popular in Western Europe than they have been since the 1990s. Interesting ideas of participation and teamwork at plant level have also been developed outside of Europe, for example, in cooperatives, which shall also be discussed in this volume.

Bibliography

  1. Ackers, P. (2010). An Industrial Relations Perspective on Employee Participation. In A. Wilkonson, P. J. Gollan, M. Marchington, & D. Lewin (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Participation in Organisations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, ch. 3.Google Scholar
  2. Adewumi, F., Ushie, E. M., & Adenugba, A. (2016). Globalisation and the Challenge of Decent Work: A Survey of Working Conditions in Nigeria. Abuja: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
  3. Adler, R. (1988). The Labor Administration in the National Railways of Mexico. Mexican Magazine of Sociology, 50(3), 97–124.Google Scholar
  4. Apor, B., Apor, P., & Rees, E. A. (Eds.). (2008). The Sovietisation of Eastern Europe: New Perspectives on the Post-War Period. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Auberger, M.-N. (2012). Les comités d’entreprise. Nouvel âge? Paris: La Documentation française.Google Scholar
  6. Azzellini, D., & Ness, I. (Eds.). (2011). Ours to Master and to Own: Workers’ Control from the Commune to the Present. Chicago: Haymarket.Google Scholar
  7. Bae, K., Nho, Y., & Shim, S. (2007). Employment Relations in Nonunionized Enterprises: Focusing on Labor–Management Councils and Alternative Worker Representation Bodies. Seoul: Korea Labor Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Baird, C. W. (1984). Opportunity or Privilege: Labor Legislation in America. Bowling Green: The Social Philosophy and Policy Center.Google Scholar
  9. Bak, J. L. (1983). Cartels, Cooperatives and Corporatism: Getulio Vargas in Rio Grande do Sul on the Eve of Brazil’s 1930 Revolution. The Hispanic America Historical Review, 63(2), 241–263.Google Scholar
  10. Barkan, J. (1984). Visions of Emancipation: The Italian Workers’ Movement Since 1945. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  11. Bedani, G. (2002). Italy in Historical Perspective: The Legacies of Fascism and Anti-Fascism. In S. Berger & H. Compston (Eds.), Policy Concertation and Social Partnership in Western Europe. Lessons for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 191–206). Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  12. Bendix, S. (1989). Industrial Relations in South Africa. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
  13. Bensusan, G. (2007). Trade Unionism in Mexico: Current Situation and Obstacles to Renewal. In C. Phelan (Ed.), Trade Union Revitalisation: Trends and Prospects in 34 Countries (pp. 75–90). Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  14. Bensusan, G., & Middlebrook, K. (2013). Trade Unions and Politics in Mexico: Changes, Continuities and Contradictions. Mexico City: FLACSO-Mexico-Clacso UAM-Xochimilco.Google Scholar
  15. Berger, S. (2002a). Germany in Historical Perspective: The Gap Between Theory and Practice. In S. Berger & H. Compston (Eds.), Policy Concertation and Social Partnership in Western Europe. Lessons for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 125–138). Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  16. Berger, S. (2002b). Social Partnership 1880–1989: The Deep Historical Roots of Diverse Strategies. In S. Berger & H. Compston (Eds.), Policy Concertation and Social Partnership in Western Europe. Lessons for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 335–352). Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  17. Berger, S. (2017). Labour Movements in Global Historical Perspective: Conceptual Eurocentrism and Its Problems. In S. Berger & H. Nehring (Eds.), The History of Social Movements in Global Perspective: A Survey (pp. 385–418). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Berger, S., & Boldorf, M. (Eds.). (2017). Social Movements and the Change of Economic Elites in Europe After 1945. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Berger, S., & Compston, H. (Eds.). (2002). Policy Concertation and Social Partnership in Western Europe. Lessons for the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  20. Bischof, G., & Pelinka, A. (Eds.). (1996). Austro-Corportatism: Past, Present, Future. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  21. Bonnell, V. E. (1983). The Russian Worker: Life and Labour Under the Tsarist Regime. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Bowden, B., Blackwood, S., Rafferty, C., & Allan, C. (Eds.). (2009). Work and Strife in Paradise. The History of Labour Relations in Queensland 1859–2009. Sydney: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
  23. Bowen, R. (1947). German Theories of the Corporative State with Special Reference to the Period 1870–1919. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Broszat, M., Henke, K., & Woller, H. (Eds.). (1988). Von Stalingrad zur Währungsreform: zur Sozialgeschichte des Umbruchs in Deutschland. Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
  25. Cerasi, L. (2017). Rethinking Italian Corporatism: Crossing Borders Between Corporatist Projects in the Late Liberal Era and the Fascist Corporate State. In A. Costa Pinto (Ed.), Corporatism and Fascism: The Corporatist Wave in Europe. London: Routledge, ch. 5.Google Scholar
  26. Clark, I. (2002). Governance, the State, Regulation and Industrial Relations. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Crouch, C., & Streeck, W. (Eds.). (2006). The Diversity of Democracy: Corporatism, the Social Order and Political Conflict. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  28. Crowley, S., & Ost, D. (2001). Workers After Workers’ States: Labor and Politics in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  29. Dzimbiri, L. B. (2008). Industrial Relations in a Developing Society: The Case of Colonial, Independent One-Party and Multiparty Malawi. Göttingen: Cuvillier.Google Scholar
  30. Eisenstadt, S. N. (Ed.). (2002). Multiple Modernities. New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Eley, G. (2002). Forging Democracy: The History of the Left in Europe 1850–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Erdmann, K.-D. (1988). Eigentum, Partnerschaft, Mitbestimmung. Zur Theorie des Sozialstaats in Österreich und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Geschichte in Wissenschaft und Unterricht, 39, 393–412.Google Scholar
  33. Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (Eds.). (1986). Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Fashoyin, T. (1992). Industrial Relations in Nigeria: Development and Practice (2nd ed.). Lagos: Longman Nigeria Ltd.Google Scholar
  35. Ford, M. (2009). Workers and Intellectuals: NGOs, Trade Unions and the Indonesian Labour Movement. Singapore/Hawaii: NUS/KITLV.Google Scholar
  36. French, J. D. (2004). Drowing in Laws: Labor Law and Brazilian Political Culture. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  37. Fulcher, J. (2002). Sweden in Historical Perspective: The Rise and Fall of the Swedish Model. In S. Berger & H. Compston (Eds.), Policy Concertation and Social Partnership in Western Europe. Lessons for the 21st Century (pp. 279–294). Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  38. Garton Ash, T. (1983). The Polish Revolution – Solidarity. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Gerber, L. G. (2005). The Irony of State Intervention: American Industrial Relations Policy in Comparative Perspective 1914–1939. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Goldfarb, J. C. (2012). Reinventing Political Culture: The Power of Culture vs the Culture of Power. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  41. Grandner, M. (1996). Conservative Social Politics in Austria, 1880–1980. Austrian Historical Yearbook, 27, 77–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hall P. A., & Soskice D. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Hedin, A. (2015). The Origins and Myths of the Swedish Model of Workplace Democracy. Contemporary European History, 24, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hordern, F. (1988). Naissance d’une institution: du contrôle ouvrier aux délégués du personnel, 1880–1939. Aix-en-Provence: Institut Régional du Travail.Google Scholar
  45. Horn, G.-R. (2008). Western European Liberation Theology: The First Wave. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Horn, G.-R. (2015). The Spirit of Vatican II: Western European Progressive Catholicism in the Long 1960s. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Isaac, J. E. (1980). Industrial Democracy in the Context of Conciliation and Arbitration. In R. D. Lansbury (Ed.), Democracy in the Workplace (pp. 34–53). Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
  48. Johnstone, S., & Ackers, P. (2015). Introduction – Employee Voice – The Key Question for Contemporary Employment Relations. In S. Johnstone & P. Ackers (Eds.), Finding a Voice at Work? New Perspectives on Employment Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Judt, T. (2006). Postwar. A History of Europe Since 1945. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  50. Katz, H. C., & Kochan, T. A. (2000). An Introduction to Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations (2nd ed.). New York: Irwin-McGraw Hill Inc.Google Scholar
  51. Kaufman, B. E. (2006). The Global Evolution of Industrial Relations: Events, Ideas and the IIRA. New Delhi: Academic Foundation.Google Scholar
  52. Kirchner, E. J. (1988). Liberal Parties in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kochan, T. A., Katz, H. C., & McKersie, R. B. (Eds.). (1994). The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. Ithaca: ILR Press.Google Scholar
  54. Lansbury, R. D., & Wailes, N. (2008). Employee Involvement and Direct Participation. In P. Blyton, N. Bacon, J. Fiorito, & E. Heery (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations (pp. 434–446). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lee, L. T. (1986). Trade Unions in China 1949 to the Present: The Organisation and Leadership of the All-China Federation of Trade Unions. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Lewis, J. (2002). Austria in Historical Perspective: From Civil War to Social Partnership. In S. Berger & H. Compston (Eds.), Policy Concertation and Social Partnership in Western Europe: Lessons for the 21st Century (pp. 19–34). Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  57. Lindemann, A. S. (1974). The Red Years: European Socialism vs. Bolshevism, 1919–1921. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  58. Mathias, P. (1969). The First Industrial Nation: The Economic History of Britain, 1700–1914. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. McMartin, J. A. (1998). Labor’s Great War: The Struggle for Industrial Democracy and the Origins of Modern American Labor Relations, 1912–1921. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  60. McNamara, D. L. (Ed.). (1999). Corporatism and Korean Capitalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Milert, W., & Tschirbs, R. (2012). Die andere Demokratie: betriebliche Interessenvertretung in Deutschland 1848–2008. Essen: Klartext.Google Scholar
  62. Moriguchi, C. (2014). Japanese Style Human Resource Management and Its Historical Origins. Japan Labour Review, 11, 58–77.Google Scholar
  63. Morley, M. J., Gunnigle, P., & Collings, D. G. (Eds.). (2006). Global Industrial Relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Moschonas, G. (2002). In the Name of Social Democracy: The Great Transformation 1945 to the Present. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  65. Müller-Jentsch, W. (2011). Gewerkschaften und soziale Marktwirtschaft seit 1945. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
  66. Nimni, E. (1991). Marxism and Nationalism: Theoretical Origins of a Political Crisis. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  67. Park, S.-J. (1982). Mitbestimmung in Japan. Produktivität durch Konsultation. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Campus-Verlag.Google Scholar
  68. Patmore, G. (2006). A Voice for Whom? Employee Representation and Labour Legislation in Australia. The University of New South Wales Law Journal, 29(1), 8–21.Google Scholar
  69. Patmore, G. (2016). Worker Voice: Employee Representation in the Workplace in Australia, Canada, Germany, the UK and the US, 1914–1939. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Plumpe, W. (2001). Kapital und Arbeit – Konzept und Praxis der industriellen Beziehungen im 20. Jahrhundert. In R. Spree (Ed.), Geschiche der deutschen Wirtschaft im 20. Jahrhundert (pp. 178–199). Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
  71. Ramalho, J. R. (2009). The Role of Trade Unionism in Recent Brazilian History. In C. Phelan (Ed.), Trade Unionism Since 1945: Towards a Global History (pp. 249–276). London: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  72. Riley, D. (2010). The Civic Foundations of Fascism in Europe: Italy, Spain and Romania, 1870–1945. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Robinson, R. A. (2002). Spain in Historical Pespective: Fascist Corporatism and Social Pacts. In S. Berger & C. Hugh (Eds.), Policy Concertation and Social Partnership in Europe. Lessons for the 21st Century (pp. 249–264). Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  74. Rogers, J., & Streek, W. (1994). Works Councils. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  75. Rojas, M. (1998). The Rise and Fall of the “Swedish Model”. Stockholm: Social Market Foundation.Google Scholar
  76. Ruble, B. A. (1981). Soviet Trade Unions: Their Development in the 1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rudischhauser, S. (2017). Geregelte Verhältnisse. Eine Geschichte des Tarifvertragsrechts in Deutschland und Frankreich (1890–1918/19). Cologne: Böhlau.Google Scholar
  78. Sassoon, D. (1996). One Hundred Years of Socialism. The West European Left in the Twentieth Century. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  79. Schieder, W. (1976). Faschismus als soziale Bewegung: Deutschland und Italien im Vergleich. Suttgart: Hoffmann & Campe.Google Scholar
  80. Schneider, M. (1999). Unterm Hakenkreuz. Arbeiter und Arbeiterbewegung 1933–1939. Bonn: J.H.W. Dietz.Google Scholar
  81. Sheehan, J. (1966). The Career of Lujo Brentano. A Study of Liberalism and Social Reform in Imperial Germany. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Silvia, S. J. (2013). Holding the Shop Together: German Industrial Relations in the Post-War Era. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sinha, P., & Srivastava, S. C. (2012). Containing Workplace Conflict – Role of Social Partners. New Delhi: The Bookhouse.Google Scholar
  84. Smelser, R. (1988). Robert Ley: Hitler’s Labour Leader. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  85. Srivastava, S. C. (2012). Industrial Relations and Labour Laws. Noida: Vikas Publishing House.Google Scholar
  86. Taylor, B., Chang, K., & Li, Q. (2003). Industrial Relations in China. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
  87. Townsend, K., Wilkinson, A., Burgess, J., & Brown, K. (2013). Has Australia’s Road to Workplace Partnership Reached a Dead End? International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 29(2), 239–256.Google Scholar
  88. Trifunovich, B. (Ed.). (1980). A Handbook of Yugoslav Socialist Self-Management. Belgrade: Socialist Thought and Practice.Google Scholar
  89. Van der Linden, M. (2008). Workers of the World: Essays Toward a Global Labour History. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Van der Walt, L., & Schmitt, M. (2008). Black Flame: The Revolutionary Class Politics of Anarchism and Syndicalism. New York: AK Press.Google Scholar
  91. Van Voss, L. H., Pasture, P., & de Maeyer, L. (Eds.). (2005). Between Cross and Class: Comparative Histories of Christian Labour in Europe, 1840–2000. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  92. Webster, E. (2001). Manufacturing Compromise: The Dynamics of Race and Class Among South African Shop Stewards in the 1990s. In R. Baldoz, R. Kpeber, & P. Craft (Eds.), The Critical Study of Work: Labour Technology and Global Production. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Wiarda, H. J. (1997). Corporatism and Comparative Politics. The Other Great ‘Ism’. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  94. Williamson, P. J. (1985). Varieties of Corporatism: A Conceptual Discussion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ch. 6.Google Scholar
  95. Wrigley, C. (1993). The State and the Challenge of Labour in Britain, 1917–1920. In C. Wrigley (Ed.), Challenges of Labour: Central and Western Europe (pp. 262–288). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  96. Yesufu, T. M. (1982). The Dynamics of Industrial Relations. The Nigerian Experience. Ibadan: University Press Limited.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Social Movements and Department of HistoryRuhr University BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations