Advertisement

Workers’ Participation at Plant Level in India

  • Pravin Sinha
Chapter

Abstract

The workers’ participation in management, especially at plant level, has been a substantial part of Indian industrial relations. Following its independence, India introduced Gandhi’s concept of trusteeship in workers-management relations. Indian government, induced by its constitutional promise to promote industrial democracy, took the initiative to create an environment for the active participation of workers in the management of business. The employers’ and workers’ approach towards their respective participation in management had been non-supportive due to fear of losing power. The experience of about seven decades has been mixed in the sense that there has been successful participation at plant level while it has largely remained on paper at the national level. The concept of participatory action has always occupied central stage in India’s pattern of governance. In the sphere of industrial management, the government took initiatives to promote workers’ participation in management. India took policy decision to introduce workers’ participation in the management of industrial establishments, although on a voluntary basis. It was implemented in the government-owned enterprises. The private sector enterprises on the other hand saw it as a threat to their control of enterprises. Infrequent dialogues caused distrust among social partners. In an environment of almost negligible progress, the government tried to give it legislative support by introducing a bill in the Parliament. Workers’ participation in management has, however, so far failed to become a way of life at the national level although there are cases of success at the enterprise level.

Keywords

Industrial policy Labor laws Workers’ participation in management Trade unions Joint Management Council Works Committee 

Bibliography

  1. Alexander, K. C. (1973). Workers Participation in Management. In C. P. Thakur & K. C. Sethi (Eds.), Industrial Democracy – Some Issues and Experiences. New Delhi: SRCIRHR.Google Scholar
  2. Besley, T., & Burgess, R. (2004). Can Labor Regulation Hinder Economic Performance? Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 91–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brennen, P., Bastone, E., Fachett, D., & White, P. (1976). The Workers’ Director: A Sociology of Participation. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  4. Gandhi, M. K. (1960). Trusteeship. Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House.Google Scholar
  5. GoI. (1980). The 6th Five Year Plan Document. New Delhi: Planning Commission, Government of India.Google Scholar
  6. GoI. (2001). The Participation of Workers’ Management Bill, 1990. 15th Report of the Standing Committee on Labour, Lok Sabha, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  7. GoI. (2006). Ministry of Labor and Employment. Government of India, Press release of 14.02.2006.Google Scholar
  8. Gopal, V. (1984). Industrial Democracy in India. Chug: Allahabad.Google Scholar
  9. Heller, F. A. (1991). Participation and Competence: A Necessary Relationship. In R. Russell & V. Rus (Eds.), International Handbook on Participation in Organisations II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. ILO. (1976). Workers’ Participation in Decisions Within Undertaking (Labour Management Relations Series, No. 48). Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  11. Sadhu, A. K. (2016). Workers Participation in Management in India. Available from http://managementversity.com/workers-participation-in-management-in-india/. Accessed 23 May 2016.
  12. Seth, N. R. (1972). Joint Management Councils – Problems and Prospects. New Delhi: Shri Ram Centre for Industrial Relations.Google Scholar
  13. Sethi, K. C. (1973). Workers Participation in Management – A Report and a View Point. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations. New Delhi: Sri Ram Centre.Google Scholar
  14. Sinha, P. (2002). Trade Unions in India – Spreading Wings. In INDIEN 2002. Hamburg: Institute for Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  15. Sinha, P., & Srivastava, S. C. (2012). Containing Workplace Conflict – Role of Social Partners. New Delhi: The Bookhouse.Google Scholar
  16. Sodhi, J. S., et al. (1995). In Search of Participation: A Study of Some Successful Companies. New Delhi: Sri Ram Centre for Industrial Relations.Google Scholar
  17. Srivastava, S. C. (2012). Industrial Relations and Labour Laws. Noida: Vikas Publishing House.Google Scholar
  18. Suri, G. K., & Kumar, J. (1989). In Search of Productivity. New Delhi: National Productivity Council.Google Scholar
  19. The Economic Weekly. (1962, January 6). Joint Management Councils – How Have They Been Working? The Economic Weekly, pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
  20. Tulpule, B. (1975). Workers Participation in Management. Economic and Political Weekly, 10(46), 1757–1759. Available from http://www.jstor.org/stable/i40033514. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.
  21. Virmani, B. R. (1978). Workers’ Participation in Management: Some Experiences and Lessons. New Delhi: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Whitely, J. H. (1931). Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India. London: H. M. Stationary Office. Available from http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/17997247?selectedversion=NBD415088. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pravin Sinha
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Indian Industrial Relations AssociationNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Labor and Industrial RelationsFriedrich Ebert StiftungNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations