Advertisement

Workers’ Participation and Transnational Social Movement Interventions at the Shop Floor: The Urgent Appeal System of the Clean Clothes Campaign

  • Jeroen Merk
  • Sabrina ZajakEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Social movements have become increasingly important in the regulation of working conditions in a context where the intensification of global economic integration, the consolidation of power in multinational enterprises, increased financialization and marketization, and recurrent economic crisis have undermined the capacity of trade unions to co-determine working conditions in transnational businesses. With unions and industrial modes of worker participation being under severe pressure, social movements and civil society organizations receive increasing attention as new actors in industrial relations.

This chapter discusses the opportunities and limits for social movements providing alternative means for worker participation along global supply chains. Global supply chains present particular barriers to organizing at production sites due to their capacity to relocate and source at locations with limited trade union rights. We look at the urgent appeal system of the Clean Clothes Campaign as a unique form of transnational participation of workers at production sites. We argue that the appeal system is a form of intervention that facilitates, enhances, and stabilizes worker participation at plant level, but it also is a mechanism of leverage in cases were shop-floor negotiations fail or don’t take place altogether. Our empirical findings suggest that institutionalized forms of worker participation are still necessary for workers to have a relevant impact on the rules of the workplace, as the urgent appeal system operates mainly in response to worker rights violations, but it does little to address the root causes driving these violations.

Bibliography

  1. Bair, J., & Palpacuer, F. (2013). From Varieties of Capitalism to Varieties of Activism. The Antisweatshop Movement in Comparative Perspective. Social Problems, 4, 522–543.Google Scholar
  2. Bair, J., & Werner, M. (2015). Global Production and Uneven Development: When Bringing Labour in Isn’t Enough. In K. Newsome, P. Taylor, & A. Rainnie (Eds.), Putting Labour in Its Place. Labour Process Analysis and Global Value Chains (pp. 119–134). Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balsiger, P. (2014). The Fight for Ethical Fashion: The Origins and Interactions of the Clean Clothes Campaign. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  4. Bartley, T., & Child, C. (2014). Shaming the Corporation. The Social Production of Targets and the Anti-Sweatshop Movement. American Sociological Review, 79, 653–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharjee, A., & Roy, A. (2012). Asia Floor Wage and Global Industrial Collective Bargaining. International Journal of Labour Research, 1, 67–82.Google Scholar
  6. Breman, J., & van der Linden, M. (2014). Informalizing the Economy: The Return of the Social Question at a Global Level. Development and Change, 45(5), 920–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bronfenbrenner, K. (2007). Conclusion. In K. Bronfenbrenner (Ed.), Global Unions – Challenging Transnational Capital Through Cross-Border Campaigns (pp. 213–225). Ithaca/London: ILR Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brookes, M. (2013). Varieties of Power in Transnational Labor Alliances. An Analysis of Workers’ Structural, Institutional, and Coalitional Power in the Global Economy. Labor Studies Journal, 3, 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campling, L., Miyamura, S., Pattenden, J., & Selwyn, B. (2016). Class Dynamics of Development: A Methodological Note. Third World Quarterly, 37(10), 1745–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caraway, T. (2009). Labor Rights in East Asia. Progress or Regress? Journal of East Asian Studies, 2, 153–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan, k.-c. C. (2014). Constrained Labour Agency and the Changing Regulatory Regime in China. Development and Change, 4, 685–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chan, J., Pun, N., & Selden, M. (2013). The Politics of Global Production: Apple, Foxconn and China’s New Working Class. New Technology, Work and Employment, 2, 100–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coe, N., & Yeung, H. (2015). Global Production Networks: Theorizing Economic Development in an Interconnected World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Compa, L. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility and Workers’ Rights. Labor Law & Policy Journal, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
  15. Dehnen, V., & Pries, L. (2014). International Framework Agreements: A Thread in the Web of Transnational Labour Regulation. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 4, 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. den Hond, F., & de Bakker, F. G. A. (2012). Boomerang Politics. How Transnational Stakeholders Impact Multinational Corporations in the Context of Globalization. In A. Lindgreen, P. Kotler, J. Vanhamme, & F. Maon (Eds.), A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: Pressures, Conflicts, Reconciliation (pp. 275–292). Aldershot: Gower Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. den Hond, F., Stolwijk, S., & Merk, J. (2014). A Strategic-Interaction Analysis of an Urgent Appeal System and Its Outcomes for Garment Workers. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 1, 83–112.Google Scholar
  18. Egels-Zandén, N., & Lindholm, H. (2014). Do Codes of Conduct Improve Worker Rights in Supply Chains? A Study of Fair Wear Foundation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Egels-Zandén, N., & Merk, J. (2013). Private Regulation and Trade Union Rights: Why Codes of Conduct Have Limited Impact on Trade Union Rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 3, 461–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans, P. (2015). Pursuing a Great Transformation. Sociology of Development, 1, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fichter, M. (2015). Organising in and Along Value Chains: What Does It Mean for Trade Unions? Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
  22. Fransen, L. (2012). Multi-Stakeholder Governance and Voluntary Programme Interactions. Legitimation Politics in the Institutional Design of Corporate Social Responsibility. Socio-Economic Review, 1, 163–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frege, C., Heery, E., & Turner, L. (2003). Comparative Coalition Building and the Revitalization of the Labor Movement. Industrial Relations Research Association Series. 55th Annunal Proceedings.Google Scholar
  24. Gallas, A., Herr, H., Hoffer, F., & Scherrer, C. (Eds.). (2016). Combating Inequality: The Global North and South. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Gereffi, G., & Lee, J. (2016). Economic and Social Upgrading in Global Value Chains and Industrial Clusters: Why Governance Matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 1, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grote, J., & Wagemann, C. (2018). Social Movements and Organized Labour. Passions and Interests. Farnham: Ashgate Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hammer, N. (2008). International Framework Agreements in the Context of Global Production. In I. Konstantinos Papadakis (Ed.), Cross-Border Social Dialogue and Agreements: An Emerging Global Industrial Relations Framework? (pp. 89–111). Geneva: International Labour Organization (International Institute for Labour Studies).Google Scholar
  28. Hassel, A. (2008). The Evolution of a Global Labor Governance Regime. Governance, 21(2), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00397.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hassler, M. (2003). The Global Clothing Production System. Commodity Chains and Business Networks. Global Networks, 4, 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heery, E., Williams, S., & Abbott, B. (2012). Civil Society Organisations and Trade Unions. Conflict, Cooperation, Indifference. Work Employment & Society, 1, 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ibsen, C. L., & Tapia, M. (2017). Trade Union Revitalisation: Where Are We Now? Where to Next? Journal of Industrial Relations, 2, 170–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kryst, M., & Zajak, S. (2018). Mehr Staat durch Markt? Adressierungsstrategien der Anti-Sweatshop-Bewegung in Europa. In P. Daphi, N. Deitelhoff, D. Rucht, & S. Teune (Eds.), Protest in Bewegung? Zum Wandel von Bedingungen, Formen und Effekten politischen Protests. Leviathan – Berliner Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaften, Chapter 2.Google Scholar
  33. Locke, R. (2013). The Promise and Limits of Private Power Promoting Labor Standards in a Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marx, A. (2012). Private Transnational Governance, Legitimacy and Dispute Settlement-A Configurational Analysis of Private Certification Systems. Working Paper 92. Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies.Google Scholar
  35. McGuire, D. (2013). Re-framing Trade. Union Mobilisation Against the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). München: Rainer Hampp Verlag.Google Scholar
  36. Merk, J. (2008). The Structural Crisis of Labour Flexibility. Strategies and Prospects for Transnational Labour Organising in the Garment and Sportswear Industries. Amsterdam: Clean Clothes Campaign.Google Scholar
  37. Merk, J. (2009). Jumping Scale and Bridging Space in the Era of Corporate Social Responsibility. Cross-Border Labour Struggles in the Global Garment Industry. Third World Quarterly, 3, 599–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Merk, J. (2016, June 23). Presence-at-a-Distance: Subcontracted Capitalism and Sociospatial Contestation in the Sportswear Industry. Paper Presented at Reinventing Corporate Accountability After Rana Plaza, Workshop, LSE.Google Scholar
  39. Miller, D., Turner, S., & Grinter, T. (2011). Back to the Future? A Critical Reflection on Neil Kearney’s Mature Systems of Industrial Relations Perspective on the Governance of Outsourced Apparel Supply Chains. Capturing the Gains, Working Paper, 2011/8.Google Scholar
  40. Niforou, C. (2014a). Labour Leverage in Global Value Chains: The Role of Interdependencies and Multi-level Dynamics. Journal of Business Ethics, 2, 1–11.Google Scholar
  41. Niforou, C. (2014b). International Framework Agreements and the Democratic Deficit of Global Labour Governance. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 2, 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nowak, J. (2017). Crossing Over: Mass Strikes in India and Brazil as the Terrain for a New Social Movement Unionism? Moving to New Geographies and New Terminologies of Social Unrest. Development and Change, 48(5), 965–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Piore, M. J., & Safford, S. (2006). Changing Regimes of Workplace Governance, Shifting Axes of Social Mobilization, and the Challenge to Industrial Relations Theory. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 3, 299–325.Google Scholar
  44. Piper, N., Rosewarne, S., & Withers, M. (2017). Addressing Migrant Precarity in Asia: ‘Networks of Labour’ for a Rights-Based Governance of Migration. Development and Change, 48(5), 1089–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pries, L., & Seeliger, M. (2013). Work and Employment Relations in a Globalized World: The Emerging Texture of Transnational Labour Regulation. Global Labour Journal, 4(1), 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reinecke, J., & Donaghey, J. (2015). After Rana Plaza: Building Coalitional Power for Labour Rights Between Unions and (Consumption-Based) Social Movement Organizations. Organization, 5, 720–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robertson, R., Di, H., Brown, D., & Dehejia, R. (2016). Working Conditions, Work Outcomes, and Policy in Asian Developing Countries, ADB Economics Working Paper Series. Manila: Asia Development Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rodriguez-Garavito, C. A. (2005). Global Governance and Labor Rights. Codes of Conduct and Anti-Sweatshop Struggles in Global Apparel Factories in Mexico and Guatemala. Politics & Society, 2, 203–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ruggie, J. G. (2017). Hierarchy or Ecosystem? Regulating Human Rights Risks of Multinational Enterprises (May 6, 2016). In C. Rodriguez-Garavito (Ed.), Business and Human Rights: Beyond the End of the Beginning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Schmalz, S., & Dörre, K. (2014). Der Machtressourcenansatz: Ein Instrument zur Analyse gewerkschaftlichen Handlungsvermögens/The Power Resource Approach: An Instrument to Analyze Trade Union Action Capabilities. Industrielle Beziehungen, 21(3), 217.Google Scholar
  51. Seidman, G. (2007). Beyond the Boycott. Labor Rights, Human Rights, and Transnational Activism. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  52. Selwyn, B. (2016). Theory and Practice of Labour-Centred Development. Third World Quarterly, 6, 1035–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Silver, B. J., & Arrighi, G. (2005). Workers North and South. In L. Amoore (Ed.), The Global Resistance Reader (273–289). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Siu, K., & Chan, A. (2015). Strike Wave in Vietnam, 2006–2011. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 1, 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Waterman, P. (2015). Adventures of Emancipatory Labour Strategy as the New Global Movement Challenges International Unionism. Journal of World-Systems Research, 10(1), 217–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Webster, E. (2015). Labour After Globalisation: Old and New Sources of Power. ISER Working Paper 2015/1.Google Scholar
  57. Xu, H., & Schmalz, S. (2017). Socializing Labour Protest: New Forms of Coalition Building in South China. Development and Change, 48(5), 1031–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zajak, S. (2013). Transnational Private Regulation and the Transformation of Labour Rights Organizations in Emerging Markets. New Markets for Labour Support Work in China. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 2, 178–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zajak, S. (2017a). Transnational Activism, Global Labour Governance, and China. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zajak, S. (2017b). Channels for Workers’ Voice in the Transnational Governance of Labour Rights? Global Policy, 48(5), 1007–1030.Google Scholar
  61. Zajak, S., Piper, N., & Egels-Zanden, N. (2017). Networks of Labour Activism: Collective Action Across Asia and Beyond. An Introduction to the Debate. Development and Change, 48(5), 899–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social and Political ScienceThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Institute for Social MovementsRuhr-University BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations