Advertisement

The Nature of Pronunciation

  • Martha C. Pennington
  • Pamela Rogerson-Revell
Chapter
Part of the Research and Practice in Applied Linguistics book series (RPAL)

Abstract

Pronunciation is a component of language and communication that conveys many different kinds of meaning and encompasses linguistic competence at micro and macro levels for both production and perception of speech, comprising (i) the segmental level of individual phonemes (consonants and vowels) and (ii) the suprasegmental or prosodic level of connected speech that includes linking and coarticulation, tone and intonation, stress and rhythm, and voice quality and articulatory setting. Terms and concepts are introduced, and examples illustrate the multiple functions conveyed in communication by pronunciation, including speaker identity, and the potential for serious misunderstanding caused by pronunciation errors or differing conventions. It is seen how pronunciation goes far beyond correct articulation to incorporate multiple layers of language proficiency and types of communicative competence.

References

  1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1984/1929). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Ed. and Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ballard, L., & Winke, P. (2017). Students’ attitudes towards English teachers’ accents: The interplay of accent familiarity, comprehensibility, intelligibility, perceived native speaker status, and acceptability as a teacher. In T. Isaacs & P. Trofimovich (Eds.), Second language pronunciation assessment: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 121–140). Bristol, UK and Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  3. Baugh, J. (2003). Linguistic profiling. In S. Makoni, G. Smitherman, A. F. Ball, & A. K. Spears (Eds.), Black linguistics: Language, society and politics in Africa and the Americas (pp. 155–168). Oxon, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beinhoff, B. (2013). Perceiving identity through accent: Attitudes towards non-native speakers and their accents in English. Oxford and Bern: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bornstein, R. F., & D’Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12(2), 103–128.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1994.12.2.103
  6. Bradford, B. (1997). Upspeak in British English. English Today, 13(3), 29–36.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400009810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brazil, D. (1997). The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Browne, K., & Fulcher, G. (2017). Pronunciation and intelligibility in assessing spoken fluency. In T. Isaacs & P. Trofimovich (Eds.), Second language pronunciation assessment: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 35–53). Bristol, UK and Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  9. Brumfit, C. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching: The roles of accuracy and fluency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. London, Thousand Oaks, and New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell-Kibler, K. (2007). Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech, 82(1), 31–64.  https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2007-002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell-Kibler, K. (2011). Intersecting variables and perceived sexual orientation in men. American Speech, 86(1), 52–68.  https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-1277510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang, J. (1996). Lessons of tolerance: Americanism and the Filipino affirmative action movement in Hawai’i. Social Processes in Hawaii, 37, 112–146 Retrieved January 1, 2018, from http://efilarchives.org/pdf/social%20process%20vol%2037/sp37_chang_tolerance.pdf
  14. Collins, B., & Mees, I. M. (2013). Practical phonetics and phonology: A resource book for students (3rd ed.). Abingdon, UK and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cruttenden, A. (2014). Gimson’s pronunciation of English (8th ed.). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dalton, P., & Hardcastle, W. J. (1977). Disorders of fluency and their effects on communication. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  17. Davies, A. (2003). The native speaker: Myth or reality. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  18. Delattre, P. (1981). An acoustic and articulatory study of vowel reduction in four languages. In B. Malmberg (Ed.), Studies in comparative phonetics (pp. 63–93). Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Eckert, P., & Rickford, J. R. (2001). Style and sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Estebas-Vilaplana, E. (2014). The evaluation of intonation: Pitch range differences in English and in Spanish. In G. Thompson & L. Alba-Juez (Eds.), Evaluation in context (pp. 179–194). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fayer, J. M., & Krasinski, E. (1987). Native and nonnative judgments of intelligibility and irritation. Language Learning, 37(3), 313–326.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00573.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fayer, J. M., & Krasinski, E. (1995). Perception of hesitation in nonnative speech. Bilingual Review, 20(2), 114–121 http://www.jstor.org/stable/25745268Google Scholar
  26. Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–423.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3588487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foulkes, P., Scobbie, J. M., & Watt, D. (2010). Sociophonetics. In W. J. Hardcastle, J. Laver, & F. E. Gibbon (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences (pp. 703–754). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Gluszek, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (2010). The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of non-native accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 214–237.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309359288
  30. Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halliday, M. A. K., & Greaves, W. S. (2008). Intonation in the grammar of English. London and Oakville, CA: Equinox.Google Scholar
  32. Harley, T. A. (2008). The psychology of language: From data to theory. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hay, J., & Drager, K. (2007). Sociophonetics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 89–103.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hieke, A. E. (1985). A componential approach to oral fluency evaluation. Modern Language Journal, 69(2), 135–142.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1985.tb01930.x
  35. Hinofotis, F., & Bailey, K. (1980). American undergraduate reactions to the communication skills for foreign teaching assistants. In J. Fisher, M. Clarke, & J. Schacter (Eds.), On TESOL ’80: Building bridges (pp. 120–133). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
  36. Honikman, B. (1964). Articulatory settings. In D. Abercrombie, D. B. Fry, P. A. D. MacCarthy, N. C. Scott, & J. L. M. Trim (Eds.), In honour of Daniel Jones: Papers contributed on the occasion of his eightieth birthday 12 September 1961 (pp. 73–84). London: Longmans, Green & Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
  37. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  38. Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P. (2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 475–505.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 83–103.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.1.83
  41. Labov, J., & Hanau, C. (2011). Pronunciation as life and death: Improving the communications skills of non-native English speaking pathologists. In B. J. Hoekje & S. M. Tipton (Eds.), English language and the medical profession: Instructing and assessing the communication skills of international physicians (pp. 261–285). Bingley, UK; Leiden and Boston: Emerald; Brill.Google Scholar
  42. Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  43. Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change: Social factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Laver, J. (1980). The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A qualitative approach. Language Learning, 40(3), 387–417.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x
  47. Leung, C., Harris, R., & Rampton, B. (1997). The idealised native speaker, reified ethnicities and classroom realities. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 543–560.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3587837
  48. Lev-Ari, S., & Keysar, B. (2010). Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1093–1096.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Levis, J. M. (2016). Accent in second language pronunciation research and teaching. (Editorial). Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 2(2), 153–159.  https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.2.2.01levCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lowe, C. T. (2000). The outsider’s voice: Discourse & identity among Filipina domestic workers in Hong Kong. PhD thesis, City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  55. Mompean, J. A. (2014). Stress shift in English: The case of teen numbers. In R. Monroy & I. Arboleda-Guirao (Eds.), Readings in English phonetics and phonology (pp. 149–164). Valencia: Universidad de Valencia, IULMA (Institut Universitari de Llengües Modernes Aplicades).Google Scholar
  56. Moyer, A. (2013). Foreign accent: The phenomenon of non-native speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x
  58. Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Morton, S. L. (2006). The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 111–131.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pennington, M. C. (1989). Teaching pronunciation from the top down. RELC Journal, 20(1), 20–38.  https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828902000103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pennington, M. C. (1990). The context of L2 phonology. In H. Burmeister & P. Rounds (Eds.), Variability in second language acquisition, Proceedings of the tenth meeting of the second language research forum, Vol 2 (pp. 541–564). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon. Available at https://books.google.com/books/about/Variability_in_second_language_acquisiti.html?id=wkYqAQAAIAAJ
  61. Pennington, M. C. (1996). Phonology in English language teaching: An international approach. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  62. Pennington, M. C. (2015). Research, theory, and practice in second language phonology: A review and directions for the future. In J. A. Mompean & J. Fouz-González (Eds.), Investigating English pronunciation: Trends and directions (pp. 149–173). Basingstoke, UK and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pennington, M. C. (2018a). Identity in language learning. In J. C. Richards & A. Burns (Eds.), Cambridge guide on second language learning (pp. 91–98). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Pennington, M. C. (2018b). Pronunciation and international employability. Invitational Plenary, April 19, 2018. AESLA (Spanish Association of Applied Linguistics) Conference XXVI, Cadiz.Google Scholar
  65. Pennington, M. C. (2018c). Pronunciation pragmatics: The importance of intonation in communication. Invitational Lecture, January 30, 2018. School for Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
  66. Pennington, M. C., Lau, L., & Sachdev, I. (2011). Diversity in adoption of linguistic features of London English by Chinese and Bangladeshi adolescents. Language Learning Journal, 39(2), 177–199.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2011.573686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pennycook, A. (1995). The cultural politics of English as an international language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  68. Pennycook, A. (2012). Language and mobility: Unexpected places. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  69. Rampton, B. (1995). Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  70. Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgements. Research report. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45–48.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00008
  71. Ricento, T. (2013). Language policy, ideology and attitudes in English-dominant countries. In R. Bayley, R. Cameron, & C. Lucas (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 525–543). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(2), 217–240.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000502
  73. Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2017). Using listener judgements to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 439–462.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Savignon, S. (1983). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  75. Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Singleton, D. (1995). Introduction: A critical look at the critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition research. In D. Singleton & Z. Lengyel (Eds.), The age factor in second language acquisition (pp. 1–29). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  77. Smith, L., & Nelson, C. (1985). International intelligibility of English: Directions and resources. World Englishes, 4(3), 333–342.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1985.tb00423.x
  78. Tannen, D. (2014). Language and culture. In R. Fasold & J. Connor-Linton (Eds.), Introduction to language and linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 353–381). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Tollfree, L. (1999). South East London English: Discrete versus continuous modelling of consonantal reduction. In P. Foulkes & G. Docherty (Eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles (pp. 163–184). London: Arnolds.Google Scholar
  80. Tomalin, B. (2010). India rising: The need for two way training. In G. Forey & J. Lockwood (Eds.), Globalization, communication and the workplace (pp. 172–189). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  81. Trudgill, P. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Ur, P. (2012). English as an international language: Implications for classroom teaching and teaching materials. Lecture at Bar-Ilan University. Retrieved January 1, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTidAm0dRR0
  83. van Leeuwen, T. (1999). Voice quality and timbre. In Speech, music, sound (pp. 125–156). London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English 2: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Williams, A., & Kerswill, P. (1999). Dialect levelling: Continuity vs. change in Milton Keynes, reading and hull. In P. Foulkes & G. Docherty (Eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles (pp. 141–162). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  87. Wilner, L. K. (2007). Communication skills training programs for doctors. Academic Internal Medicine Insight, 5(3), 14–15. Retrieved January 1, 2018, from AAIM Archives at http://www.im.org/p/cm/ld/fid=209
  88. Yau, J. N. W. (2010). Call centre discourse: Graduation in relation to voice quality and attitudinal profile. In G. Forey & J. Lockwood (Eds.), Globalization, communication and the workplace (pp. 107–124). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  89. Zuengler, J. (1988). Identity markers and L2 pronunciation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10(1), 10–49.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310000694X

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martha C. Pennington
    • 1
  • Pamela Rogerson-Revell
    • 2
  1. 1.SOAS and Birkbeck CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.EnglishUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations