Advertisement

‘You can really start birdwatching in your backyard, and from there the sky’s the limit’

  • Lise Kjølsrød
Chapter
Part of the Leisure Studies in a Global Era book series (LSGE)

Abstract

Observing wild birds has been an attractive recreational interest for more than a century. Today, millions worldwide enjoy this activity. With the help of a widespread net of amateurs, professional ornithology provides an understanding of birds’ life cycles, interrelationships with the wider environment, and much more. An historic alliance between players and professionals has contributed to growth of strong organizations, and gradually pulled individual birdwatchers into wider scientific and political engagements. In later decades, major ornithological organizations have given themselves a broadened mandate, penetrated by concerns for wildlife and biodiversity more widely, and thereby increasingly politicized birders’ territory. New technology, combined with the widespread use of small digital appliances, apps, and interactive databases make the activity more popular, and augment new scenarios for citizen science.

References

  1. American Ornithologists’ Union. http://www.americanornithology.org/content/aou-history. Retrieved 8 January 2018.
  2. Bargheer, S. Moral Entanglements: The Emergence and Transformation of Bird Conservation in Great Britain and Germany, 1790–2010. The University of Chicago: Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of the Division of The Social Sciences, 2011.Google Scholar
  3. Bargheer, S. Moral Entanglements: Conserving Birds in Great Britain and Germany. Chicago: The University of Chicago, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bello. “Bird-watching in FARCland.” The Economist, 8–14 July 2017.Google Scholar
  5. BioBlitz. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BioBlitz#cite. Retrieved 10 July 2017.
  6. Bircham, P. A History of Ornithology. London: Collins, 2007.Google Scholar
  7. Bonney, R., C. B. Cooper, J. Dickinson, S. Kelling, T. Philips, K. V. Rosenberg, and J. Shirk. “Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy.” BioScience 59, no. 11 (2009): 977–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. British Trust for Ornithology. https://www.bto.org/. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
  9. Carson, R. Silent Spring. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1962.Google Scholar
  10. Christmas Bird Count Bibliography. http://Audubon.org/Christmas-bird-count-bibliography. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
  11. Cole, J., and D. Scott. “Segmenting Participation in Wildlife Watching: A Comparison of Casual Wildlife Watchers and Serious Birders.” Human Dimensions in Wildlife 4, no. 4 (1999): 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins, M. A. Symbolism of Animals and Birds Represented in English Church Architecture. New York: Mcbride, Nast & Company, 1913.Google Scholar
  13. Cooper, C. B., and J. A. Smith. Gender Patterns in Bird-related Recreation in the USA and UK. Ecology and Society 15, no. 4 (2010). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art4/.
  14. Cornell Lab of Ornithology. http://www.birds.cornell.edu/page.aspx?pid=2752. Annual Report and Financials 2016. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
  15. Donelley, P. “Take My Word for It: Trust in the Context of Birding and Mountaineering.” Qualitative Sociology 17, no. 3 (1994): 215–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dudley, S., T. Benton, P. Fraser, and J. Ryan. Rare Birds Day by Day. London: T & A. D. Poyser, 2010.Google Scholar
  17. Dunlap, T. R. In the Field, Among the Feathered: A History of Birders & Their Guides. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  18. Franzen, J. Freedom. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2010.Google Scholar
  19. Guillaumont, F. Philosophe et augure, recherches sur la théorie cicéronienne de la divination. Bruxelles: coll. Latomus, 1984.Google Scholar
  20. Huizinga, J. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Boston: The Beacon Press, 1955 [1938].Google Scholar
  21. Koeppel, D. To See Every Bird on Earth: A Father, a Son, and a Lifelong Obsession. New York: A Plume Book, 2006.Google Scholar
  22. Lachmund, J. “Strange Birds: Ornithology and the Advent of the Collared Dove in Post-World War II Germany.” Science in Context 28, no. 2 (2015): 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Life, Birds and Everything. Blogging about Wild Things that Make My Heart Sing. Blog posted 10 December 2013. https://fieldguidetohunmmingbirds.wordpress.com/category/activism. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  24. Limosaholidays. http://www.limosaholidays.co.uk/bird. Retrieved 30 May 2017.
  25. List of Birdwatchers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Listofbirdwatchers. Retrieved 22 June 2017.
  26. Luk, T. W. “Beyond Birds: Biopower and Birdwatching in the World of Audubon.” Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 11, no. 3 (2000): 7–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayfield, H. F. “Commentary. The Amateur in Ornithology.” The Auk 96 (1979): 168–171.Google Scholar
  28. Mayfield, H. F. “The Amateur: Finding a Niche in Ornithology.” Nebraska Bird Review 59, no. 2 (1991): 38–42. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebbirdrev/416.Google Scholar
  29. McDaniel, J., and K. D. Alley. “Connecting Local Environmental Knowledge and Land Use Practices: A Human Ecosystem Approach to Urbanization in West Georgia.” Urban Ecosystems 8 (2005): 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moss, S. A Bird in the Bush: A Social History of Birdwatching. London: Aurum Press, 2010 [2004].Google Scholar
  31. Munson, M. A. et al. “A Method for Measuring the Relative Information Content of Data from Different Monitoring Protocols.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1, no. 3 (2010): 263–273.Google Scholar
  32. National Audubon Society. http://www.audubon.org. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
  33. Norsk ornitologisk forening (Norwegian Ornithological Society). http://birdlife.no/. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  34. Odell, J., M. E. Mather, and R. Muth “A Biosocial Approach for Analyzing Environmental Conflicts: A case Study of Horseshoe Crab Allocation.” BioScience 55, no. 9 (2005): 735–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Penna, A. N. Nature’s Bounty: Historical and Modern Environmental Perspectives. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1999.Google Scholar
  36. Rokkan, S. Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Process of Development. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2009 [1966].Google Scholar
  37. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. www.rspb.org.uk. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
  38. Rubio-Cisneros, N. et al. “Transnational Ecosystem Services: The Potential of Habitat Conservation for Waterfowl Through Recreational Hunting Activities.” Human Dimensions of Wildlife 19, (2014): 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2013.819536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saha, P. “Diplomat by Day, Birding Fanatic Around the Clock. Peter Castner Takes Audubon’s Christmas Bird Count Tradition All the Way to Afghanistan.” 2014. http://www.audobon.org/news. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  40. Schaffner, S. “Environmental Sporting: Birding at Superfund Sites, Landfills, and Sewage Ponds.” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 33, no. 20 (2009). http://jss.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/3/206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sethi, A. “Birdwatching with Margaret Atwood—The Booker Prize-winning Author is a Lifelong Conservationist and Birder—No Wonder All Manner of Winged Creatures Flit through Her Works,” 2016. https://ft.com/content/9e1e1506-9b04-11e6-b8c6-568a43813464.
  42. Taylor, C. Sources of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  43. U.S. Environmental Directories, Inc. The World Directory of Bird Organizations and Related Sites. http://earthdirectory.net/birds. Retrieved 21 June 2017.
  44. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Birding in the United States: A Demographic and Economic Analysis. Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-4, 2009.Google Scholar
  45. Watson, G. P. L. Multiple Acts of Birding: the Education, Ethics and Ontology of Bird Watching in Ontario. Doctoral Dissertation, York University, Toronto, 2010. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10315/6363.
  46. Weidensaul, S. Of a Feather: A Brief History of Birding. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, 2007.Google Scholar
  47. Wiersma, Y. F. “Birding 2.0: Citizen Science and Effective Monitoring in the Web 2.0.” Avian Conservation and Ecology 5, no. 2 (2010): 13. http://www.ace-eco.org/vol5/iss2/art13/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lise Kjølsrød
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Human GeographyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations