Advertisement

The Hidden Democracy

  • Lise Kjølsrød
Chapter
Part of the Leisure Studies in a Global Era book series (LSGE)

Abstract

Players’ communities are not subcultures, it is better to think of them as social worlds. The modern versions of these social worlds resemble what the political philosopher Hannah Arendt called polis. Citizens who practice their freedoms in complex leisure do not join to gain influence in certain matters, they enter for the sake of being able to do what they do. In addition to what they achieve for themselves in terms of gratification, identity, and belonging, they grow a surprising crop of autodidact skills and knowledge; contribute to the natural environment, social institutions, and cultural heritage; and they construct analytical models with personal and political implications. This is what justifies the notion of a ‘hidden democracy’.

References

  1. Adorno, T. W. The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  3. Balzac, H. de. Cousin Pons. Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics, 1968 [1899].Google Scholar
  4. Bang, H. P. “Governance as Political Communication.” In Governance as Social and Political Communication, edited by H. P. Bang, 7–23. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  5. Bang, H. P. “Culture Governance: Governing Self-Reflexive Modernity.” Public Administration 82, no. 1 (2004): 157–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bang, H. P., and T. B. Dyrberg. “Governing at Close Range: Demo-Elites and Lay People.” In Governance as Social and Political Communication, edited by H. P. Bang, 222–240. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  7. Baudrillard, J. The System of Objects. London and New York: Verso, 1996 [1968].Google Scholar
  8. Becker, H. “Art as Collective Action.” American Sociological Review 39, no. 6 (1974): 767–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belk, R. W. Collecting in a Consumer Society. London and New York: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. Bell, D. The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. New York: Basic Books, 1976.Google Scholar
  11. Blom, P. To Have and to Hold: An Intimate History of Collectors and Collecting. London: Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar
  12. Boltanski, L., and E. Chiapello. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso, 2005 [1999].Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984 [1974].Google Scholar
  14. Braverman, H. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  15. Canetti, E. Auto-da-Fé. London: Pan Books, Ltd., 1978 [1935].Google Scholar
  16. Collins, R. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Critchley, S. Infinitely Demanding. Ethics of Commitment, Politics of Resistance. London and New York: Verso, 2007.Google Scholar
  18. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2000 [1975].Google Scholar
  19. d’Entreves, M. P. “Hannah Arendt.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2016. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/arendt/. Retrieved December 2017.
  20. de Tocqueville, A. Democracy in America. Volume 1. New York: Vintage Books, 1945 [1835].Google Scholar
  21. Durkheim, E. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: The Free Press, 1965 [1912].Google Scholar
  22. Eliot, G. Middlemarch. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Classics, 1994 [1874].Google Scholar
  23. Elster, J. Strong Feelings: Emotion, Addiction and Human Behaviour. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  24. Erikson, E. H. Toys and Reasons: Stages in the Ritualization of Experience. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc., 1977.Google Scholar
  25. Fine, G. A. Shared Fantasy: Role-Playing Games as Social Worlds. Chicago: The G. A. University of Chicago Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  26. Fine, G. A. Morel Tales: The Culture of Mushrooming. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2003 [1998].Google Scholar
  27. Fine, G. A., and B. Harrington. “Tiny Publics: Small Groups and Civil Society.” Sociological Theory 22, no. 3 (2004): 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Finnegan, R. The Hidden Musicians: Music-Making in an English Town. Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press, 2007 [1989].Google Scholar
  29. Giddens, A. Transformation of Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  30. Goffman, E. “Where the Action is.” In Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, edited by E. Goffman, 149–270. New York: Pantheon Books, 1967.Google Scholar
  31. Goffman, E. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1986 [1974].Google Scholar
  32. Hall, P., and M. Lamont. “Introduction.” In Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era, edited by P. Hall and M. Lamont, 1–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harris, P. L. “Fictional Absorption: Emotional Responses to Make-Believe.” In Intersubjective Communication of Emotion in Early Ontogeny, edited by S. Bråten, 336–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  34. Harris, P. L. The Work of the Imagination. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., 2000.Google Scholar
  35. Huizinga, J. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Boston: The Beacon Press, 1955 [1938].Google Scholar
  36. Kjølsrød, L. “Adventure Revisited: On Structure and Metaphor in Specialized Play.” Sociology 37, no. 3 (2003): 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kjølsrød, L. “Om kalde dukker, noble sverd og erobrende sprang—Metaforisk kommunikasjon i spesialisert lek” (On Cold Dolls, Noble Swords and Seductive Jumps—Metaphoric Communication in Specialized Play). In Dialog, Selv og Samfunn (Dialogue, Self and Society), edited by I. Frønes and T. Schou Wetlesen, 87–112. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag AS, 2004.Google Scholar
  38. Kjølsrød, L. “How Innocent is Our Scientific Vocabulary? Rethinking Recent Sociological Conceptualizations of Complex Leisure.” Sociology 43, no. 2 (2009): 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kjølsrød, L. “Mediated Activism: Contingent Democracy in Leisure Worlds.” Sociology 47, no. 6 (2013): 1207–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kjølsrød, L. “Kultursosiologiske studier av lek og fritid” (Cultural Sociology and Studies of Play and Leisure). In Kultursosiologisk forskning (Research in Cultural Sociology), edited by H. Larsen, 108–119. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2015.Google Scholar
  41. Koeppel, D. To See Every Bird on Earth: A Father, a Son, and a Lifelong Obsession. New York: Plume, 2006.Google Scholar
  42. Kumar, K. “An Inquiry into the Usefulness of an Historical Term.” The British Journal of Sociology 74, no. 3 (1993): 374–395.Google Scholar
  43. Levitt, P. Artifacts and Allegiances: How Museums Put the Nation and the World on Display. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Loewenstein, G. “Because It Is There: The Challenge of Mountaineering…for Utility Theory.” Kyklos 52, no. 3 (1999): 315–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lyng, S. “Edgework: A Social Psychological Analysis of Voluntary Risk Taking.” American Journal of Sociology 95, no. 4 (1990): 851–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mæland, S. B.A.S.E. En studie i samtidskultur (B.A.S.E. A Study of Contemporary Culture). Høgskolen i Telemark: Department of Culture Studies and Humanities, 2002.Google Scholar
  47. Mead, G. H. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934.Google Scholar
  48. Muensterberger, W. Collecting: An Unruly Passion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  49. Nielsen, K., and J. S. Abildgaard. “The Development and Validation of a Job Crafting Measure for Use with Blue-Collar Workers.” Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work Health & Organizations 26 (2012): 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2012.733543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Norris, P. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  51. Orford, J. Excessive Appetites: A Psychological View of Addictions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1985.Google Scholar
  52. Pellis, S., and V. Pellis. The Playful Brain. Venturing to the Limits of Neuroscience. Oxford: Oneworld, 2009.Google Scholar
  53. Perinbanayagam, R. Games and Sport in Everyday Life. Dialogues and Narratives of the Self. Boulder, CO and London: Paradigm Publishers, 2006.Google Scholar
  54. Putnam, R. D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Shuster, 2000.Google Scholar
  55. Rorty, R. “Pragmatism and Romanticism” (Columbia version), Paper given in Oslo, 2005.Google Scholar
  56. Russell, B. In Praise of Idleness. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1935.Google Scholar
  57. Savery, J. R., and T. M. Duffy. Problem Based Learning: An Instructional Model and Its Constructivist Framework. Indiana University: Center for Research on Learning and Technology, 2001.Google Scholar
  58. Schiermer, B. Project Description: Creative Action in Different Cultural Settings. Submitted to Department of Sociology and Human Geography, The University of Oslo, 2016.Google Scholar
  59. Scott, J. C. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  60. Sennett, R. The Fall of Public Man. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company, 1974.Google Scholar
  61. Simmel, G. “The Adventurer.” Translated by David Kettler. In George Simmel, On Individuality and Social Forms, edited by Donald Levine, 187–198. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971 [1911].Google Scholar
  62. Snyder, T. On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century. New York: Tim Duggan Books, 2017.Google Scholar
  63. Sontag, S. The Volcano Lover. New York: Picador, 2004 [1992].Google Scholar
  64. Spencer, H. Principles of Psychology. New York: Appleton, 1896 [1855].Google Scholar
  65. Sutton-Smith, B. The Ambiguity of Play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001 [1997].Google Scholar
  66. Taylor, C. Sources of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  67. Taylor, C. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  68. Tilly, C. “Citizenship, Identity and Social History.” In Citizenship, Identity and Social History, edited by C. Tilly, 6–8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  69. Turner, V. From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. New York: PAJ Publications, 1982 [1967].Google Scholar
  70. Urry, J. “Mobile Sociology.” The British Journal of Sociology 51, no. 1 (2000): 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wertsch, J. V. Mind as Action. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  72. White, H. C. Careers and Creativity. Social Forces in the Arts. Boulder, CO; San Francisco; Oxford: Westview Press, 1993Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lise Kjølsrød
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Human GeographyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations