Advertisement

Comparative Capitalism

  • Andreas Nölke
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Handbooks in IPE book series (PHIPE)

Abstract

Nölke provides a comprehensive overview on the application of the institutionalist Comparative Capitalism paradigm in international political economy. The paradigm is used to answer questions such as why do states interact in a certain issue area of the regulation of the global political economy in a specific way, what is the nature of capitalism in advanced and emerging economies, how can we explain that some economies can grow faster than others, how do international institutions and economic interdependencies affect national capitalist institutions, how can we explain the strategies of multinational corporations based on their national origin and what are the long-term tendencies with regard to the nature of the capitalist order?

References

  1. Albert, Michael. 1996. Capitalism Against Capitalism. London: Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Amable, Bruno. 2003. The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arinci, Suau, Nadia Pessina Lucia, and Matthias Ebenau. 2015. All Varieties Are Equal… Contributions from Dependency Approaches to Critical Comparative Capitalisms Research. In New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives, ed. Matthias Ebenau, Ian Bruff, and Christian May, 189–206. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  4. Baccaro, Lucio, and Chiara Benassi. 2017. Throwing out the Ballast: Growth Models and the Liberalization of German Industrial Relations. Socio-Economic Review 15: 85–115.Google Scholar
  5. Baccaro, Lucio, and Jonas Pontusson. 2016. Rethinking Comparative Political Economy: The Growth Model Perspective. Politics and Society 42: 175–207.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, Uwe. 2009. Open Varieties of Capitalism: Continuity, Change and Performance. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2013. The BRICs and Emerging Economies in Comparative Perspective: Political Economy, Liberalisation and Institutional Change. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, Joachim. 2014a. The Periphery in the Present International Crisis: Uneven Development, Uneven Impact and Different Responses. Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies 5: 21–41.Google Scholar
  9. Becker, Uwe. 2014b. The Heterogeneity of Capitalism in Crisis-Ridden Europe. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 22: 261–275.Google Scholar
  10. Benney, Tabitha. 2014. Making Environmental Markets Work: The Varieties of Capitalism in Emerging Economies. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Beramendi, Pablo, Silja Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt, and Hanspeter Kriesi. 2015. Introduction: The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. In The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, ed. P. Beramendi, S. Häusermann, H. Kitschelt, and H. Kriesi, 1–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bohle, Dorotheee, and Bela Greskovits. 2012. Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Boschi, Roberto, and Carlos Henrique Santana, eds. 2012. Development and Semi-periphery: Post-neoliberal Trajectories in South America and Central Eastern Europe. London/New York/Delhi: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  14. Boyer, Robert, Hiroyasu Uemura, and Akinori Isogai, eds. 2012. Diversity and Transformations of Asian Capitalisms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos. 2012. Five Models of Capitalism. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 32 (1): 21–32.Google Scholar
  16. Bruff, Ian, Matthias Ebenau, Christian May, and Andreas Nölke, eds. 2013. Vergleichende Kapitalismusforschung: Stand, Perspektiven, Kritik. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  17. Bruff, Ian, Matthias Ebenau, and Christian May. 2015. Fault and Fracture? The Impact of New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research on the Wider Field. In New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives, ed. Matthias Ebenau, Ian Bruff, and Christian May, 28–44. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  18. Carney, Michael, Eric Gedajlovic, and Xiaohua Yang. 2009. Varieties of Asian Capitalism: Towards an Institutional Theory of Asian Enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 26: 361–380.Google Scholar
  19. Claar, Simone, and Andreas Nölke. 2013. Deep Integration in North-South-Relations: Compatibility Issues between the EU and South Africa. Review of African Political Economy 40: 274–289.Google Scholar
  20. Coates, David. 2005. Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  21. Crouch, Colin, and Wolfgang Streeck, eds. 1997. Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. De Ville, Ferdi, and Mattias Vermeiren. 2016. The Eurozone Crisis and the Rise of China in the Global Monetary and Trading System: The Political Economy of an Asymmetric Shock. Comparative European Politics 14: 572–603.Google Scholar
  23. Detomasi, David. 2014. The Multinational Corporation as a Political Actor: ‘Varieties of Capitalism’ Revisited. Journal of Business Ethics 128: 685–700.Google Scholar
  24. Farkas, Beata. 2016. Models of Capitalism in the European Union: Post-Crisis Perspectives. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  25. Feldmann, Magnus. 2017. Crisis and Opportunity: Varieties of Capitalism and Varieties of Crisis Responses in Estonia and Slovenia. European Journal of Industrial Relations 23: 33–46.Google Scholar
  26. Fioretos, Orfeo. 2001. The Domestic Sources of Multilateral Preferences: Varieties of Capitalism in the European Community. In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, ed. Peter A. Hall and David Soskice, 213–244. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2010. Capitalist Diversity and the International Regulation of Hedge Funds. Review of International Political Economy 17: 696–723.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2011. Creative Reconstructions: Multilateralism and European Varieties of Capitalism after 1950. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gallagher, Kevin P. 2015. Contesting the Governance of Capital Flows at the IMF. Governance 28 (2): 185–198.Google Scholar
  30. Gambarotto, Francesca, and Stefano Solari. 2014. The Peripheralization of Southern European Capitalism within the EMU. Review of International Political Economy 22: 788–812.Google Scholar
  31. Hall, Peter A. 2012. The Economics and Politics of the Euro Crisis. German Politics 21: 355–381.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 2014. Varieties of Capitalism and the Euro Crisis. West European Politics 37: 1223–1243.Google Scholar
  33. Hall, Peter A. and Gingerich, Daniel W. 2004. Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy, MPIfG Discussion Paper 04/5. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  34. Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice, eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hall, Peter A., and Kathleen Thelen. 2009. Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism. Socio-Economic Review 7: 7–34.Google Scholar
  36. Hancké, Bob. 2013a. Unions, Central Banks, and EMU: Labor Market Institutions and Monetary Integration in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2013b. The Missing Link: Labor Unions, Central Banks and Monetary Integration in Europe. Transfer: European Review of Labor and Research 19: 89–101.Google Scholar
  38. Hancké, Bob, Martin Rhodes, and Mark Thatcher, eds. 2007. Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hassel, Anke. 2006. Die Schwächen des deutschen Kapitalismus. In Gibt es einen deutschen Kapitalismus? Die soziale Marktwirtschaft im Weltsystem, ed. V. Berghahn and S. Vitols, 200–214. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 2014. Adjustments in the Eurozone: Varieties of Capitalism and the Crisis in Southern Europe. Berlin: Hertie School of Governance.Google Scholar
  41. Hollingsworth, James, and Robert Boyer. 1997. Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Höpner, Martin and Mark Lutter 2014. One Currency and Many Modes of Wage Formation: Why the Eurozone Is Too Heterogeneous for the Euro, MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/14. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  43. Höpner, Martin and Armin Schäfer 2012. Integration among Unequals: How the Heterogeneity of European Varieties of Capitalism Shapes the Social and Democratic Potential of the EU, MPIfG Discussion Paper 12/5: Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  44. Jackson, Gregory and Deeg, Richard 2006. How Many Varieties of Capitalism? Comparing the Comparative Institutional Analyses of Capitalist Diversity, MPIfG Discussion Paper 06/2. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  45. Jessop, Bob. 2014. Variegated Capitalism, das Modell Deutschland, and the Eurozone Crisis. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 22: 248–260.Google Scholar
  46. Johnston, Alison, and Aidan Regan. 2016. European Monetary Integration and the Incompatibility of National Varieties of Capitalism. Journal of Common Market Studies 54: 318–336.Google Scholar
  47. Johnston, Alison, Hancké, Bob and Pant, Suman 2013. Comparative Institutional Advantage in the European Debt Crisis, LEQS Paper 66/2013. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  48. Kalinowski, Thomas. 2013. Regulating International Finance and the Diversity of Capitalism. Socio-Economic Review 11: 471–496.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2015. Second Image IPE: Global Economic Imbalances and the ‘Defects’ of the East Asian Development Model. International Politics 52: 760–778.Google Scholar
  50. Katzenstein, Peter J. 1976. International Relations and Domestic Structures: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. International Organization 30 (1): 1–45.Google Scholar
  51. Kuokštis, Vytautas. 2015. Jingle Bells and Struggling GIPS: Comparing Baltic and Southern Eurozone’s Crisis Experience Using the Varieties of Capitalism Framework. Acta Oeconomica 65: 39–64.Google Scholar
  52. May, Christian, and Andreas Nölke. 2014. Capitalism in Large Emerging Economies and the New Global Trade Order. In Handbook of the International Political Economy of Trade, ed. David A. Deese, 45–470. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  53. ———. 2015. Critical Institutionalism in Studies of Comparative Capitalisms: Conceptual Considerations and Research Programme. In New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives, ed. Matthias Ebenau, Ian Bruff, and Christian May, 83–100. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  54. McNally, Christopher A. 2007. China’s Capitalist Transition: The Making of a New Variety of Capitalism. Comparative Social Research 24: 177–203.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 2015. The Political Economic Logic of RMB Internationalization: A Study of Sino-Capitalism. International Politics 52: 704–723.Google Scholar
  56. ———. 2017. Rebalancing the Economy, Refurbishing the State: The Political-economic Logic of Sino-capitalism in Contemporary China. Revue de la régulation 21.Google Scholar
  57. Nölke, Andreas. 1999. Transnational Economic Relations and National Models of Capitalism: Institutional Investors and the ‘Disembedding’ of German Corporate Finance. Paper Presented to the Workshop on “National Models and Transnational Structures – Globalisation and Public Policy”, ECPR, Mannheim.Google Scholar
  58. ———. 2004. Transnational Private Authority and Corporate Governance. In New Rules for Global Markets: Public and Private Governance in the World Economy, ed. Stefan A. Schirm, 155–176. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  59. ———. 2009. Finanzkrise, Finanzialisierung und Vergleichende Kapitalismusforschung. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 16: 123–139.Google Scholar
  60. ———. 2010. A “BRIC” Variety of Capitalism and Social Inequalities: The Case of Brazil. Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Américas 4: 1–14.Google Scholar
  61. ———. 2011a. Transnational Economic Order and National Economic Institutions: Comparative Capitalism Meets International Political Economy, MPIfG Working Paper 11:3. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  62. ———. 2011b. Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation on Accounting Standards: A ‘Varieties of Capitalism’ Perspective. In Systemic Implications of Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation and Competition, ed. Simon J. Evenett and Robert M. Stern, 287–311. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  63. ———. 2011c. Non-triad Multinational Enterprises and Global Economic Institutions. In Governing the Global Economy, ed. Dag Harald Claes and Carl Henrik Knutsen, 277–291. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. ———. 2012. The Rise of the B(R)IC Variety of Capitalism: Towards a New Phase of Organized Capitalism? In Neoliberalism in Crisis, ed. Henk Overbeek and Bastiaan van Apeldoorn, 117–133. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  65. ———, ed. 2014a. Multinational Corporations from Emerging Markets: State Capitalism 3.0. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  66. ———. 2014b. Corporations, the State and Transnational Activity. Critical Perspectives on International Business 10: 230–236.Google Scholar
  67. ———. 2015a. Second Image Revisited: The Domestic Sources of China’s Foreign Economic Policies. International Politics 52: 657–665.Google Scholar
  68. ———. 2015b. International Financial Regulation and Domestic Coalitions in State-Permeated Capitalism: China and Global Banking Rules. International Politics 52: 743–759.Google Scholar
  69. ———. 2016a. Economic Causes of the Eurozone Crisis: The Analytical Contribution of Comparative Capitalism. Socio-Economic Review 14: 141–161.Google Scholar
  70. ———. 2016b. For a Plurality of Economic and Social Models! Against a Monolithic Euro State! In Key Controversies in European Integration, ed. Hubert Zimmermann and Andreas Dürr, 137–144. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  71. ———. 2017. Brexit: Towards a New Global Phase of Organized Capitalism? Competition & Change 21: 230–241.Google Scholar
  72. Nölke, Andreas, and Simone Claar. 2012. Tiefe Integration in den Nord-Süd-Beziehungen: Vergleichende Perspektiven. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 28: 80–98.Google Scholar
  73. ———. 2013. Varieties of Capitalism in Emerging Economies. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa 81: 33–54.Google Scholar
  74. Nölke, Andreas, and Christian May. 2013. Vergleichende Kapitalismusforschung im Zeitalter der Krise der Finanzialisierung: Vom inter-nationalen zum inter-temporalen Studium ökonomischer Institutionen. Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik 6: 51–70.Google Scholar
  75. Nölke, Andreas, and James Perry. 2007. Coordination Service Firms and the Erosion of Rhenish Capitalism. In The Transnational Politics of Corporate Governance Regulation, ed. Henk Overbeek, Bastiaan Van Apeldoorn, and Andreas Nölke, 121–136. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  76. Nölke, Andreas, and Heather Taylor. 2010. Non-triad Multinationals and Global Governance: Still a North-South Conflict? In Business and Global Governance, ed. Morten Ougaard and Anna Leander, 156–178. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. Nölke, Andreas, Tobias ten Brink, Simone Claar, and Christian May. 2015. Domestic Structures, Foreign Economic Policies and Global Economic Order: Implications from the Rise of Large Emerging Economies. European Journal of International Relations 21: 538–567.Google Scholar
  78. Otero-Iglesias, Miguel, and Mattias Vermeiren. 2015. China’s State-Permeated Market Economy and its Constraints to the Internationalization of the Renminbi. International Politics 52: 684–703.Google Scholar
  79. Padayachee, Vishnu. 2013. Introducing Varieties of Capitalism to the South African Debate: Uses and Limits. Transformation: Critical Perspective on Southern Africa 81–82: 5–32.Google Scholar
  80. Perry, James, and Andreas Nölke. 2007. The Political Economy of International Accounting Standards. Review of International Political Economy 13: 559–586.Google Scholar
  81. Polanyi, Karl. 1944/1978. The Great Transformation: Politische und ökonomische Ursprünge von Gesellschaften und Wirtschaftssystemen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  82. Regan, Aidan. 2013. Political Tensions in Euro-Varieties of Capitalism: The Crisis of the Democratic State in Europe, EUI Working Paper MWP 2013/14. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
  83. ——— 2015. ‘The Imbalance of Capitalisms in the Eurozone: Can the North and South of Europe Converge?’, Comparative European Politics, advance online publicationGoogle Scholar
  84. Rougier, Eric, and Francois Combarnous. 2017. The Diversity of Emerging Capitalisms in Developing Countries: Globalization, Institutional Convergence and Experimentation. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  85. Scharpf, Fritz. 2011. Monetary Union, Fiscal Crisis, and the Preemption of Democracy, MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/11, Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  86. Schneider, Ben Ross. 2013. Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America: Business, Labor, and the Challenges of Equitable Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Shonfield, Andrew. 1965. Modern Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Stockhammer, Engelbert. 2011. Peripheral Europe’s Debt and German Wages: The Role of Wage Policy in the Euro Area. International Journal of Public Policy 7: 83–96.Google Scholar
  89. Stockhammer, Engelbert, Cedric Durand, and Ludwig List. 2014. European Growth Models and Working Class Restructuring. Version 0.36, (manuscript), accessed at http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/v_2014_10_30_list.pdf on 6 Nov 2014.
  90. Streeck, Wolfgang. 2014. Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  91. Taylor, Heather, and Andreas Nölke. 2010a. Indian Multinationals and their Institutional Environment: A Varieties of Capitalism Perspective. In Aspects of Varieties of Capitalism, ed. Henrik Egbert and Clemens Esser, 41–64. Saarbrücken: Lambert.Google Scholar
  92. Taylor, Heather and Andreas Nölke. 2010b. Global Players From India: A Political Economy Perspective. In Foreign Direct Investments From Emerging Markets: the Challenges Ahead, ed. Karl P. Sauvant and Geraldine McAllister with Wolfgang A. Maschek, 145–172, Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  93. ten Brink, Tobias. 2015. Chinese Firms ‘Going Global’: Recent OFDI Trends, Policy Support and International Implications. International Politics 52: 666–683.Google Scholar
  94. Thelen, Kathleen. 2014. Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Van Zon, Hans. 2016. Globalized Finance and Varieties of Capitalism. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  96. Vermeiren, Mattias. 2014. Power and Imbalances in the Global Monetary System: A Comparative Capitalism Perspective. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  97. Waltz, Kenneth N. 1959. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Wigger, Angela, and Andreas Nölke. 2007. Enhanced Roles of Private Actors in EU Business Regulation and the Erosion of Rhenish Capitalism: The Case of Antitrust Enforcement. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 45: 487–513.Google Scholar
  99. Witt, Michael A., and Gregory Jackson. 2016. Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Comparative Advantages: A Test and Reinterpretation. Journal of International Business Studies 47: 778–906.Google Scholar
  100. Witt, Michael A., and Gordon Redding. 2014. The Oxford Handbook on Asian Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Yamamura, Kozo, and Wolfgang Streeck, eds. 2001. The Origin of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Nölke
    • 1
  1. 1.International Relations and International Political EconomyGoethe UniversityFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations