Advertisement

Complex Systems, International Political Economy and the Behavioral/Contracts Theory of the Firm

  • Michael I. C. Nwogugu
Chapter

Abstract

There are some sociological, behavioral and legal issues that influence the creation and evolution of corporate entities and sometimes results in financial distress. These factors are applicable to the modeling of the rates of business formation, regional economic growth, corporate financial distress, industry structure and economic growth.

References

  1. Adler, B. (1993). Financial and Political Theories of American Corporate Bankruptcy. Stanford Law Review, 45(2), 311–346.Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal, R., Barney, J., Foss, N., & Klein, P. G. (2009). Heterogeneous Resources and the Financial Crisis: Implications of Strategic Management Theory. Strategic Organization, 7(4), 467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aghion, P., & Holden, R. (2011). Incomplete Contracts and the Theory of the Firm: What have we Learned over the Past 25 Years? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(2), 181–197.Google Scholar
  4. Akgün, A., Keskin, H., & Byrne, J. (2014). Complex Adaptive Systems Theory and Firm Product Innovativeness. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 31, 21–42.Google Scholar
  5. Aleksiejuk, A., & Holyst, J. (2001). A Simple Model of Bank Bankruptcies. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 299(1–2), 198–204.Google Scholar
  6. Aleksiejuk, A., & Holyst, J. (2018). A Simple Model of Bank Bankruptcies (Working paper).Google Scholar
  7. Alghalith, M. (2008). Recent Applications of Theory of the Firm Under Uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(2), 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Anderson, P. (1999). Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Argote, L., & Greve, H. (2007). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm—Forty Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact. Organization Science, 18(3), 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Auerswald, P. (2008). Entrepreneurship in the Theory of the Firm. Small Business Economics, 30(2), 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baird, D., & Picker, R. (1991). A Simple Non-cooperative Bargaining Model of Corporate Reorganization. Journal of Legal Studies, 20(2), 311–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baker, G. (2002). Relational Contracts and the Theory of the Firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 39–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baker, G., & Hubbard, T. (2001). Empirical Strategies in Contract Economics: Information and the Boundary of the Firm. American Economic Association Papers & Proceedings, American Economic Review, 91(2), 193–196.Google Scholar
  14. Balazs, K. (2012). Contract Theory of the Firm. Economics & Sociology, 5(1).Google Scholar
  15. Barr, J., & Saraceno, F. (2002). A Computational Theory of the Firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 49(3), 345–361.Google Scholar
  16. Bellu, R., Davidsson, P., & Goldfarb, C. (1990). Toward a Theory of Entrepreneurial Behavior—Empirical Evidence from Israel, Italy and Sweden. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2, 195–209.Google Scholar
  17. Bhargave, R., Chakravarti, A., & Guha, A. (2015). Two-stage Decisions Increase Preference for Hedonic Options. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 130, 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Biais, B., & Perotti, E. (2008). Entrepreneurs and New Ideas. RAND Journal of Economics, 39(4), 1105–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bowers, J. (1994). Rehabilitation, Redistribution or Dissipation: The Evidence for Choosing Among Bankruptcy Hypothesis. Washington University Law Quarterly, 72, 955–960.Google Scholar
  20. Brown, S., & Eisenhardt, K. (1997). The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Buldyrev, S., Salinger, M., & Stanley, E. (2016). A Statistical Physics Implementation of Coase’s Theory of the Firm. Research in Economics, 70(4), 536–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carsrud, A., & Johns, R. (1989). Entrepreneurship: A Social Psychological Perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1, 21–31.Google Scholar
  23. Cheung, S. (1983). The Contractual Nature of the Firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chiu, S. (1998). Noncooperative Bargaining, Hostages, and Optimal Asset Ownership. The American Economic Review, 88(4), 882–901.Google Scholar
  25. Choi, H. (2008, August). The Profitable Theory of the Firm (Working Paper). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1149926.
  26. Choi, Y., & Douady, R. (2013). Financial Crises and Contagion: Dynamical Systems Approach. In Handbook on Systemic Risk. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ciepley, D. A. (2013). Beyond Public and Private: Toward a Political Theory of the Corporation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cordes, C., Recheòson, P., McElreath, R., & Ótrimling, P. (2008). A Naturalistic Approach to the Theory of the Firm: The Role of Cooperation and Cultural Evolution. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(1), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Crossan, K. (2005). The Theory of the Firm and Alternative Theories of Firm Behaviour: A Critique. International Journal of Applied Institutional Governance, 1(1), 1–13. http://www.managementjournals.com/journals/ig/vol1/21-1-1-2.pdf.
  30. Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (1997). Values, Beliefs and Regional Variations in New Firm Formation Rates. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(2–3), 179–200.Google Scholar
  31. Dietrich, M. (2000). Accounting for the Economics of the Firm. Management Accounting Research, 12(2), 3–20.Google Scholar
  32. DiGuilmi, C., Gaffeo, E., & Gallegati, M. (2004). Bankruptcy as an Exit Mechanism for Systems with a Variable Number of Components. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 344(1–2), 8–13.Google Scholar
  33. Doern, R., Williams, N., & Vorley, T. (2019). Special Issue on Entrepreneurship and Crises: Business as Usual? An Introduction and Review of the Literature. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 31(1–2), 400–412.Google Scholar
  34. Dominici, G. (2017). Governing Business Systems: Theories and Challenges for Systems Thinking in Practice. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 34, 310–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dosi, G., Faillo, M., & Marengo, L. (2008). Organizational Capabilities, Patterns of Knowledge Accumulation and Governance Structures in Business Firms: An Introduction. Organization Studies, 29(8–9), 1165–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ebeling, W., Karmeshu, & Scharnhoff, A. (2001). Dynamics of Economic and Technological Search Processes in Complex Adaptive Landscapes. Advances in Complex Systems, 4, 71–88.Google Scholar
  37. Estola, M. (2001). A Dynamic Theory of a Firm: An Application of Economic Forces. Advances In Complex Systems, 4(1), 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fehr, E., Hart, O., & Zehnder, C. (2011). Contracts as Reference Points—Experimental Evidence. American Economic Review, 101(2), 493–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. (2004). Entrepreneurship and the Economic Theory of the Firm: Any Gains from Trade? In R. Agarwal, S. A. Alvarez, & O. Sorenson (Eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship: Disciplinary Perspectives. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  40. Foss, K., Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. (2007). Original and Derived Judgment: An Entrepreneurial Theory of Economic Organization. Organization Studies, 28(12), 1893–1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Franks, R., Nyborg, G., & Torous, W. (1996). A Comparison of US, UK and German Insolvency Codes. Financial Management, 25(3), 86–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fransman, M. (1994). Information, Knowledge, Vision and Theories of the Firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 713–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fu, D., et al. (2005). The Growth of Business Firms: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(52), 18801–18806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fujiwara, Y. (2008). Chain Of Firms’ Bankruptcy: A Macroscopic Study of Link Effect in a Production Network. Advances in Complex Systems, 11(5), 703–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Garrouste, P., & Saussier, S. (2005). Looking for a Theory of the Firm: Future Challenges. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 58, 178–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gatewood, E., Shaver, K., & Gartner, W. (1995). A Longitudinal Study of Cognitive Factors Influencing Startup Behaviors and Success of Venture Creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 371–391.Google Scholar
  47. Gattai, V., & Natale, P. (2015). A New Cinderella Story: Joint Ventures and the Property Rights Theory of the Firm. Journal of Economic Surveys.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12135. ISSN 1467-6419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gertner, R., & Scharfstein, D. (1991). A Theory of Workouts and the Effects of Reorganization Law. Journal of Finance, 1189.Google Scholar
  49. Ghoshal, S., Moran, P., & Almeida-Costa, L. (1995). The Essence of the Mega-corporation: Shared Context, not Structural Hierarchy. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 151, 748–759.Google Scholar
  50. Gibbons, R. (2005). Four Formal(izable) Theories of the Firm? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 58, 200–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gifford, A. (1991). A Constitutional Interpretation of the Firm. Public Choice, 68(1–3), 91–106.Google Scholar
  52. Greve, H. (2003). Investment and the Behavioral Theory of the Firm: Evidence from Shipbuilding. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 1051–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1986). The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 691–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hart, O. (1988). Incomplete Contracts and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4(1), 119–139.Google Scholar
  55. Hart, O. (1995). Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  56. Hart, O. (2008). Reference Points and the Theory of the Firm. Economica, 75(4), 4–11.Google Scholar
  57. Hart, O. (2009). Hold-up, Asset Ownership, and Reference Points. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 267–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1988). Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation. Econometrica, 56(4), 755–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1990). Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1119–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hart, O., & Moore, J. (2007). Incomplete Contracts and Ownership: Some New Thoughts. American Economic Review, 97(2), 182–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hart, O., & Moore, J. (2008). Contracts as Reference Points. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hart, O., Fehr, E., & Zehnder, C. (2015). How Do Informal Agreements and Renegotiation Shape Contractual Reference Points? Journal of the European Economic Association, 13(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hart, P. (2000). Theories of Firms’ Growth and the Generation of Jobs. Review of Industrial Organization, 17, 229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hellman T (July 2005). Entrepreneurship in the Theory of the Firm: The process of Obtaining Resources (Working Paper). University of British Columbia. http://strategy.sauder.ubc.ca/hellmann/pdfs/Entrepreneurship_Hellmann_July_2005.pdf.
  65. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., et al. (2001). In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in Fifteen Small-Scale Societies. American Economic Association Papers & Proceedings. American Economic Review, 91(2), 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hofer, C., Jäger, G., & Füllsack, M. (2018). Critical Transitions and Early Warning Signals in Repeated Cooperation Games. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 5(3), 223–230.Google Scholar
  67. Holmstrom, B. (1999). The Firm as a Sub-economy. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 15, 74–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Hölzl, W. (2005). The Evolutionary Theory of the Firm. Routines, Complexity and Change. Working Papers Series “Growth and Employment in Europe: Sustainability and Competitiveness”, 46. Inst. für Volkswirtschaftstheorie und -politik, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  69. Hsiao, C., Chang, P., & Ho, S. (2010). Applying Evolutionary Perspective to Analyse the TFT‐LCD Industry Development in Taiwan. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 28(3), 283–300.Google Scholar
  70. Hua, Z., Sun, Y., & Xu, X. (2011). Operational Causes of Bankruptcy Propagation in Supply Chain. Decision Support Systems, 51(3), 671–681.Google Scholar
  71. Inarra, E., Laruelle, A., & Zuazo-Garin, P. (2015). Games with Perception. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 64–65, 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Islankina, E., & Thurner, T. (2018). Internationalization of Cluster Initiatives in Russia: Empirical Evidence. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(7–8), 776–799.Google Scholar
  73. Kaisla, J. (2001). Extending the Constitutional Theory of the Firm by Introducing Conventions (Working Paper).Google Scholar
  74. Kaufman, B. (2003). The Organization of Economic Activity: Insights from the Institutional Theory of John R. Commons. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(1), 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Keen, S., Legge, J., Fishburn, G., & Standish, R. (2004). Aggregation Fallacies in the Theory of the Firm (Working Paper). http://www.debunkingeconomics.com/Papers/Micro/Keenetal2004SS_AER_Names.pdf.
  76. Kemelgor, B. (2002). A Comparative Analysis of Corporate Entrepreneurial Orientation between Selected Firms in the Netherlands and the US. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 14(1), 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Knight, F. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., The Riverside Press.Google Scholar
  78. Kulik, B., & Baker, T. (2008). Putting the Organization Back into Computational Organization Theory: A Complex Perrowian Model of Organizational Action. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 14(2), 84–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Kupetz, D. (1999). The Bankruptcy Code Is Part of Every Contract. The Business Lawyer, 54, 55–60.Google Scholar
  80. Kwasnicki, W. (2001). Firm Decision Making Processes in an Evolutionary Model of Industrial Dynamics. Advances in Complex Systems, 4(1), 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Langlois, R. (1995). Do Firms Plan? Constitutional Political Economy, 6, 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Langlois, R. (2006). Competition Through Institutional Form: The Case of Cluster Tool Standards. In S. Greenstein & V. Stango (Eds.), Standards and Public Policy (pp. 60–86). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Langlois, R. (2007a, May). The Austrian Theory of the Firm: Retrospect and Prospect. Paper for the conference “Austrian Market Based Approaches to the Theory and Operation of the Business Firm”, George Mason Law School, Arlington, Virginia, USA.Google Scholar
  84. Langlois R (2007b). The Entrepreneurial Theory of the Firm and the Theory of the Entrepreneurial Firm. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 1107–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Langlois, R., & Robertson, R. (1993/2002). Business Organization as a Coordination Problem: Toward a Dynamic Theory of the Boundaries of the Firm. Business and Economic History, 22(1, Fall ), 31–41. Reprinted in Langlois, R. N., Yu, T. F.-L., & Robertson, P. L. (Eds.), Alternative Theories of the Firm (Vol. III). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (2002).Google Scholar
  86. Laukkanen, M., & Nittykangas, H. (2003). Local Developers as Virtual Entrepreneurs—Do Difficult Surroundings Need Initiating Interventions? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15(4), 309–331.Google Scholar
  87. Laskovaia, A., Marino, L., et al. (2019). Expect the Unexpected: Examining the Shaping Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Causal and Effectual Decision-Making Logic during Economic Crisis. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 31(1–2), 456–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Lee, Y., et al. (1998). Universal Features in the Growth Dynamics of Complex Organizations. Physics Review Letters, 80(15), 3275–3278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Lewin, P. (1998). The Firm, Money and Economic Calculation: Considering the Institutional Nexus of Market Production. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 57(4), 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Lewin, P., & Phelan, S. (2000). An Austrian Theory of the Firm. The Review of Austrian Economics, 13(1), 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Li, J., Qu, J., & Huang, Q. (2018). Why are Some Graduate Entrepreneurs More Innovative than Others? The Effect of Human Capital, Psychological Factor and Entrepreneurial Rewards on Entrepreneurial Innovativeness. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(5–6), 479–501.Google Scholar
  92. Libeskind, J. (1996). Knowledge, Strategy and the Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Liu, R., Chen, P., et al. (2015). Identifying Early-warning Signals of Critical Transitions with Strong Noise by Dynamical Network Markers. Scientific Reports, 5, 17501.Google Scholar
  94. Lomi, A., & Larsen, E. (1998). Density Delay and Organizational Survival: Computational Models and Empirical Comparisons. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 3(4), 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. LoPucki, L. (1993). Corporate Governance in the Bankruptcy Reorganization of Large Publicly-Held Companies. University of Pennsylvannia Law Review, 141(1), 669–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Love, J. (2005). On the Opportunism-Independent Theory of the Firm. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29, 381–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Matouschek, N. (2004). Ex-Post Inefficiencies in a Property Rights Theory of the Firm. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 20, 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Meantysaari, P. (2012). Economic Theories of the Firm. Chapter-2. In Organizing the Firm: Theories of Commercial Law, Corporate Law and Corporate Governance. Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  99. Meza, D., & Lockwood, B. (1998). Does Asset Ownership Always Motivate Managers? Outside Options and the Property Rights Theory of the Firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 361–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Migdał, P., Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., Denkiewicz, M., & Plewczynski, D. (2012). Information-sharing and Aggregation Models for Interacting Minds. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(6), 417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Mondani, H., Holme, P., & Liljeros, F. (2014). Fat-Tailed Fluctuations in the Size of Organizations: The Role of Social Influence. PLoS ONE, 9(7), e100527.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Moro, A., Fink, M., et al. (2018). Loan Managers’ Decisions and Trust in Entrepreneurs in Different Institutional Contexts. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(1–2), 146–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Muro, S. (2008). Bankruptcy Control and the Theory of the Firm. Latin American and Caribbean Law and Economics Association (ALACDE) Annual Papers.Google Scholar
  104. Müller, S., & Korsgaard, S. (2018). Resources and Bridging: The Role of Spatial Context in Rural Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(1–2), 224–255.Google Scholar
  105. Niman, N. (2004). The Evolutionary Firm and Cournot’s Dilemma. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28, 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Nooteboom, B. (2006). Elements of a Cognitive Theory of the Firm. Advances in Austrian Economics, 9, 145–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Nowak, N., Vallacher, R., & Borkowski, W. (2000). Modeling the Temporal Coordination of Behavior and Internal States. Advances in Complex Systems, 3, 67–86.Google Scholar
  108. Nuesch, S. (2015). Dual-Class Shares, External Financing Needs, and Firm Performance. Journal of Management & Governance, 20(3), 525–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Nwogugu, M. (2006). Regret Minimization, Willingness-To-Accept-Losses and Framing. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 179(2), 440–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. O’Kelley, C. (2012). Coase, Knight, and the Nexus-of-contracts Theory of the Firm: A Reflection on Reification, Reality, and the Corporation as Entrepreneur Surrogate. Seattle University Law Review, 35(4).Google Scholar
  111. Paredes-Frigolett, H., Nachar-Calderón, P., & Marcuello, C. (2017). Modeling the Governance of Cooperative Firms. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 23(1), 122–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Plunket, A., & Saussier, S. (2003). Human Asset Specificity in Alternative Theories of the Firms: How to Rule Out Competing Views. Economie et Institutions, 3, 103–130.Google Scholar
  113. Prietula, M., & Watson, H. S. (2008). When Behavior matters: Games and computation in a Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 66(1), 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Quax, R., Chliamovitch, G., Dupuis, A., et al. (2018). Information Processing Features can Detect Behavioral Regimes of Dynamical Systems. Complexity, 2018, Article ID 6047846.Google Scholar
  115. Rai, T., & Diermeier, D. (2015). Corporations are Cyborgs: Organizations Elicit Anger But Not Sympathy When They Can Think But Cannot Feel. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Rajan, R., & Zingales, L. (2001). The Influence of the Financial Revolution on the Nature of Firms. American Economic Association Papers & Proceedings, American Economic Review, 91(2), 206–210.Google Scholar
  117. Rees, R. (1974). A Reconsideration of the Expense Preference Theory of the Firm. Economica, 41, 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Riccaboni, M., et al. (2008). The Size Variance Relationship of Business Firm Growth Rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(50), 19595–19600.Google Scholar
  119. Samuel, Y., & Jacobsen, C. (1997). A System Dynamics Model of Planned Organizational Change. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 3(3), 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Sánchez-Pérez, J. (2018). On the Linearity Property for Allocation Problems and Bankruptcy Problems. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 5(1), 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Sánchez-Sánchez, F., & Vargas-Valencia, M. (2018). Games with Nested Constraints given by a Level Structure. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 5(2), 95–107.Google Scholar
  122. San Martin, A., Swaab, R., Sinaceur, M., & Vasiljevic, D. (2015). The Double-Edged Impact of Future Expectations in Groups: Minority Influence Depends on Minorities’ and Majorities’ Expectations to Interact Again. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 128, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Schmitz, P. W. (2006). Information Gathering, Transaction Costs, and the Property Rights Approach. American Economic Review, 96(1), 422–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Schneider, M., & Somers, M. (2006). Organizations as Complex Adaptive Systems: Implications of Complexity Theory for Leadership Research. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Schwartz, A. (1989). A Theory of Loan Priorities. Journal of Legal Studies, 18(2), 209–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Sieczka, P., Sornette, D., & Holyst, J. (2011). The Lehman Brothers Effect and Bankruptcy Cascades. European Physics Journal-B, 82, 257–259.Google Scholar
  127. Song, I., & Bae, J. (2016). Politics, Strong Institutions and Competitive Advantage: An Examination of Organizational Aspiration for Competition. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 22(4), 412–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Spulber, D. (2008). Entrepreneurs in the Theory of the Firm (Working Paper). Northwestern University, USA. http://www.aeaweb.org/annual_mtg_papers/2008/2008_95.pdf.
  129. Stiglitz, J. (1972). Some Aspects of the Pure Theory of Corporate Finance: Bankruptcies and Takeovers. Bell Journal of Economics & Management Science, 3(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Tabata, M., Eshima, N., & Takagi, I. (2002). An Infinite Continuous Model Which Derives from a Finite Discrete Model Describing the Time Evolution of the Density of Firms. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 125(1), 105–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Teece, D. (2015). Intangible Assets and a Theory of Heterogeneous Firms. In A. Bounfour & T. Miyagawa (Eds.), Intangibles, Market Failure and Innovation Performance (pp. 217–239). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  132. Teece, D. (2016). Dynamic Capabilities and Entrepreneurial Management in Large Organizations: Toward a Theory of the (Entrepreneurial) Firm. European Economic Review, 86, 202–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Thompson, S., & Valentinov, V. (2017). The Neglect of Society in the Theory of the Firm: A Systems-Theory Perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(4), 1061–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Todtiling, F., & Wanzenbock, H. (2003). Regional Differences in Structural Characteristics of Startups. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15(4), 351–370.Google Scholar
  135. Triantis, G., & LoPucki, L. (1994). A Systems Approach to Comparing U.S. and Canadian Reorganization of Financially Distressed Companies. Harvard International Law Journal, 35, 267–277.Google Scholar
  136. Tsay, A., Gray, J., Noh, I., & Mahoney, J. (2018). A Review of Production and Operations Management Research on Outsourcing in Supply Chains: Implications for the Theory of the Firm. Production and Operations Management, 27(7), 1177–1220.Google Scholar
  137. Tyszka, T., & Sokolowska, J. (1992). Perceptions and Judgments of the Economic System. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 421–448.Google Scholar
  138. Vaghely, I., & Julien, P. (2010). Are Opportunities Recognized or Constructed? An Information Perspective on Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Van Dijk, P., & Sverisson, A. (2003). Enterprise Clusters in Developing Countries: Mechanisms of Transition and Stagnation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 15(3), 183–206.Google Scholar
  140. Van Witteoostuijin, A., & Boone, C. (2003). Toward a Game Theory of Organizational Ecology: Production Adjustment Costs and Managerial Growth Preferences. Strategic Organization, 1(3), 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Whinston, M. (2001). Assessing the Property Rights and Transaction-Cost Theories of Firm Scope. American Economic Review, 91(2), 184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Williamson, O. (1963). Managerial Discretion and Business Behavior. American Economic Review, 53, 1032–1057.Google Scholar
  143. Williamson, O. (2002). The Theory of the Firm as Governance Structure: From Choice to Contract. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Wiltshire, J., Bourdage, J., & Lee, K. (2014). Honesty-Humility and Perceptions of Organizational Politics in Predicting Workplace Outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 29(2), 235–251.Google Scholar
  145. Witt, U. (2007). Firms as Realizations of Entrepreneurial Visions. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1125–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Witt, U., & Schubert, C. (2008). Constitutional Interests in the Face of Innovations: How Much Do We Need to Know About Risk Preferences? Constitutional Political Economy, 19, 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Xiao, L., & North, D. (2018). Financing High-Tech SMEs in China. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(1–2), 29–57.Google Scholar
  148. Yamasaki, N., et al. (2006). Preferential Attachment and Growth Dynamics in Complex Systems. Physics Review-E, 74(035103R), 1–4.Google Scholar
  149. Yu, T. (1999). Toward a Praxeological Theory of the Firm. Review of Austrian Economics, 12, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Yu, Y., Xiao, G., Zhou, J., et al. (2016). System Crash as Dynamics of Complex Networks. PNAS, 113(42), 11726–11731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Zimmerman, M., Egonluz, V., San Miguel, L., & Spadaro, A. (2000). Cooperation in an Adaptive Network. Advances in Complex Systems, 3, 283–300.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael I. C. Nwogugu
    • 1
  1. 1.EnuguNigeria

Personalised recommendations