Advertisement

Analysis and Interpretation: Spatial Climate Field Reconstructions

  • Jürg Luterbacher
  • Eduardo Zorita
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides a short overview of spatial climate field reconstructions (CFR), the technique of employing different statistical methods to reconstruct climate (such as temperature, precipitation, drought, and air pressure) over large geographical areas based on data from climate proxies. CFR methods have been applied both to filling spatial gaps in early instrumental climate datasets and to the problem of reconstructing past climate patterns from natural and documentary-based proxy data.

References

  1. Allan, Rob et al. “The International Atmospheric Circulation Reconstructions over the Earth (ACRE) Initiative.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 92 (2011): 1421–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ammann, C., and E.R. Wahl. “The Importance of the Geophysical Context in Statistical Evaluations of Climate Reconstruction Procedures.” Climatic Change 85 (2007): 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anchukaitis, K.J. et al. “The Influence of Volcanic Eruptions on the Climate of the Asian Monsoon Region.” Geophysical Research Letters 37 (2010): L22703.Google Scholar
  4. Anchukaitis, K.J. et al. “Last Millennium Northern Hemisphere Summer Temperatures from Tree Rings: Part II: Spatially Resolved Reconstructions.” Quaternary Science Reviews 163 (2017): 1–22.Google Scholar
  5. Briffa, K. et al. “Tree-Ring Width and Density Data around the Northern Hemisphere: Part 2, Spatio-Temporal Variability and Associated Climate Patterns.” The Holocene 12 (2002): 759–89.Google Scholar
  6. Cook, Edward R. et al. “Tree-Ring Reconstructed Summer Temperature Anomalies for Temperate East Asia since 800 CE.” Climate Dynamics 41 (2013): 2957–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook, Edward R. et al. “Old World Megadroughts and Pluvials during the Common Era.” Science Advances 1 (2015): e1500561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dannenberg, M.P., and E.K. Wise. “Performance of Climate Field Reconstruction Methods over Multiple Seasons and Climate Variables.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 118 (2013): 9595–610.Google Scholar
  9. Fischer, E.M. et al. “European Climate Response to Tropical Volcanic Eruptions over the Last Half Millennium.” Geophysical Research Letters 34 (2007): L05707.Google Scholar
  10. Franke, J. et al. “200 Years of European Temperature Variability: Insights from and Tests of the Proxy Surrogate Reconstruction Analog Method.” Climate Dynamics 37 (2011): 133–50.Google Scholar
  11. Gao, Y., and C. Gao. “European Hydroclimate Response to Volcanic Eruptions over the Past Nine Centuries.” International Journal of Climatology 37 (2017): 4146–57.Google Scholar
  12. Graham, N.E. et al. “Support for Global Climate Reorganization during the ‘Medieval Climate Anomaly’.” Climate Dynamics 37 (2011): 1217–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guillot, D. et al. “Statistical Paleoclimate Reconstructions via Markov Random Fields.” Annals of Applied Statistics 9 (2015): 324–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jansen, E. et al. “Palaeoclimate.” In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H.L. Miller, 435–84. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  15. Küttel, M. et al. “The Importance of Ship Log Data: Reconstructing North Atlantic, European and Mediterranean Sea Level Pressure Fields back to 1750.” Climate Dynamics 34 (2010): 1115–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luterbacher, J. et al. “Reconstruction of Sea Level Pressure Fields over the Eastern North Atlantic and Europe back to 1500.” Climate Dynamics 18 (2002): 545–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luterbacher, J. et al. “European Seasonal and Annual Temperature Variability, Trends, and Extremes Since 1500.” Science 303 (2004): 1499–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luterbacher, J. et al. “European Summer Temperatures since Roman Times.” Environmental Research Letters 11 (2016): 024001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mann, Michael E. et al. “Testing the Fidelity of Methods Used in Proxy-Based Reconstructions of Past Climate.” Journal of Climate 18 (2005): 4097–107.Google Scholar
  20. Mann, M.E. et al. “Proxy-Based Reconstructions of Hemispheric and Global Surface Temperature Variations over the Past Two Millennia.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (2008): 13252–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neukom, R. “Multiproxy Climate Reconstructions for Southern South America back to AD 900.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Bern, 2010.Google Scholar
  22. Neukom, R. et al. “Multiproxy Summer and Winter Surface Air Temperature Field Reconstructions for Southern South America Covering the Past Centuries.” Climate Dynamics 37 (2011): 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. PAGES 2k-PMIP3 group. “Continental-Scale Temperature Variability in PMIP3 Simulations and PAGES 2k Regional Temperature Reconstructions over the Past Millennium.” Climate of the Past 11 (2015): 1673–99.Google Scholar
  24. Pauling, A. et al. “Five Hundred Years of Gridded High-Resolution Precipitation Reconstructions over Europe and the Connection to Large-Scale Circulation.” Climate Dynamics 26 (2006): 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rao, M. et al. “European and Mediterranean Hydroclimate Responses to Tropical Volcanic Forcing over the Last Millennium.” Geophysical Research Letters 44 (2017): 5104–12.Google Scholar
  26. Riedwyl, N. et al. “Comparison of Climate Field Reconstruction Techniques: Application to Europe.” Climate Dynamics 32 (2009): 381–95.Google Scholar
  27. Schmidt, G.A. et al. “Climate Forcing Reconstructions for Use in PMIP Simulations of the Last Millennium (v1.0).”Geoscientific Model Development 4 (2011): 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schneider, T. “Analysis of Incomplete Climate Data: Estimation of Mean Values and Covariance Matrices and Imputation of Missing Values.” American Meteorological Society 14 (2001): 853–71.Google Scholar
  29. Shi, Feng et al. “A Multi-Proxy Reconstruction of Spatial and Temporal Variations in Asian Summer Temperatures over the Last Millennium.” Climatic Change 131 (2015): 663–76.Google Scholar
  30. Shi, Feng et al. “Multi-Proxy Reconstructions of May–September Precipitation Field in China over the Past 500 Years.” Climate of the Past 13 (2017): 1919–38.Google Scholar
  31. Smerdon, J. “Climate Models as a Test Bed for Climate Reconstruction Methods: Pseudoproxy Experiments.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 3 (2012): 63–77.Google Scholar
  32. Smerdon, J. et al. “A Pseudoproxy Evaluation of the CCA and RegEM Methods for Reconstructing Climate Fields of the Last Millennium.” Journal of Climate 23 (2010): 4856–80.Google Scholar
  33. Smerdon, J. et al. “Spatial Performance of Four Climate Field Reconstruction Methods Targeting the Common Era.” Geophysical Research Letters 38 (2011): GL047372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smerdon, J. et al. “Model-Dependent Spatial Skill in Pseudoproxy Experiments Testing Climate Field Reconstruction Methods for the Common Era.” Climate Dynamics 46 (2016): 1921–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smerdon, J. et al. “Comparing Data and Model Estimates of Hydroclimate Variability and Change over the Common Era.” Climate of the Past 13 (2017): 1851–900.Google Scholar
  36. Steiger, N., and J. Smerdon. “A Pseudoproxy Assessment of Data Assimilation for Reconstructing the Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics of Hydroclimate Extremes.” Climate of the Past 13 (2017): 1435–49.Google Scholar
  37. Tingley, M.P., and P. Huybers. “A Bayesian Algorithm for Reconstructing Climate Anomalies in Space and Time. Part I: Development and Applications to Paleoclimate Reconstruction Problems.” American Meteorological Society 23 (2010a): 2759–81.Google Scholar
  38. Tingley, M.P., and P. Huybers. “A Bayesian Algorithm for Reconstructing Climate Anomalies in Space and Time. Part II: Comparison with the Regularized Expectation–maximization Algorithm.” Journal of Climate 23 (2010b): 2782–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van Loon, H., and J.C. Rogers. “The Seesaw in Winter Temperatures between Greenland and Northern Europe. Part I: General Description.” Monthly Weather Review 106 (1978): 296–310.Google Scholar
  40. Wahl, E.R. et al. “Comparative Performance of Paleoclimate Field and Index Reconstructions Derived from Climate Proxies and Noise-only Predictors.” Geophysical Research Letters 39 (2012): L06703.Google Scholar
  41. Wahl, E. et al. “Late Winter Temperature Response to Large Tropical Volcanic Eruptions in Temperate Western North America: Relationship to ENSO Phases.” Global and Planetary Change 122 (2014): 238–50.Google Scholar
  42. Wang, J. et al. “Evaluating Climate Field Reconstruction Techniques Using Improved Emulations of Real-World Conditions.” Climate of the Past 10 (2014): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Werner, J.P. et al. “A Pseudoproxy Evaluation of Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling and Canonical Correlation Analysis for Climate Field Reconstructions over Europe.” Journal of Climate 26 (2013): 851–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Werner, J. et al. “Spatio-Temporal Variability of Arctic Summer Temperatures over the Past 2 Millennia.” Climate of the Past 14 (2018): 527–57.Google Scholar
  45. Xoplaki, E. et al. “European Spring and Autumn Temperature Variability and Change of Extremes over the Last Half Millennium.” Geophysical Research Letters 32 (2005): L15713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jürg Luterbacher
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eduardo Zorita
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Geography, Climatology, Climate Dynamics and Climate ChangeJustus Liebig University of GiessenGiessenGermany
  2. 2.Centre of International Development and Environmental ResearchJustus Liebig University of GiessenGiessenGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum GeesthachtGeesthachtGermany

Personalised recommendations