Advertisement

F. A. Hayek pp 227-256 | Cite as

Hayek, Epistemics, Institutions, and Change

  • Peter J. Boettke
Chapter
Part of the Great Thinkers in Economics book series (GTE)

Abstract

In order to understand Hayek’s intellectual journey, one must appreciate his formation in Vienna during the early twentieth century, one of the most vibrant intellectual centers of the time. Hayek was familiar with the debates on the role of epistemology in the natural sciences, and these arguments influenced his own understanding of the scope and method of economics. What the social scientist is always studying is the result of the interaction of the minds of a multitude of individuals. The context within which these minds interact is fundamentally important to trace the basis for the unintended consequences of human action. Hence, epistemic considerations must be at the front and center in our study of economic, political, and social phenomena.

Bibliography

  1. Arrow, Kenneth J. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boettke, Peter J. 2012. Living Economics: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Oakland: Independent Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Boettke, Peter J., and Christopher J. Coyne. 2009. An Entrepreneurial Theory of Social and Cultural Change. In Markets and Civil Society: The European Experience in Comparative Perspective, ed. Victor Perez-Díaz, 77–103. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  4. Boettke, Peter J., and Kyle W. O’Donnell. 2013. The Failed Appropriation of FA Hayek by Formalist Economics. Critical Review 25 (3–4): 305–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchanan, James M. 1954. Social Choice, Democracy, and Free Markets. Journal of Political Economy 62 (2): 114–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. [1964] 1999. What Should Economists Do?. In The Logical Foundations of Constitutional Liberty, 28–42, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1969. Is Economics the Science of Choice? In Roads to Freedom: Essays in Honour of Friedrich A. von Hayek, 47–64. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. ———. [1979] 1999. Politics Without Romance: A Sketch of Positive Public Choice Theory and Its Normative Implications. In The Logical Foundations of Constitutional Liberty, 45–59. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  9. ———. [1982] 2001. Cultural Evolution and Institutional Reform. In Federalism, Liberty, and the Law, 311–323. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  10. ———. [1987] 2001. Market Failure and Political Failure. In Federalism, Liberty, and the Law, 276–288. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  11. ———. [1989] 2001. On the Structure of the Economy: A Re-emphasis of Some Classical Foundations. In Federalism, Liberty, and the Law, 263–275. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  12. ———. [1993] 2001. The Individual as Participant in Political Exchange. In Federalism, Liberty, and the Law, 185–197. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2005. Afraid to Be Free: Dependency as Desideratum. Public Choice 124: 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buchanan, James M., and Roger D. Congleton. 1998. Politics by Principle, Not Interest: Towards Nondiscriminatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buchanan, James M., and Gordon Tullock. 1962. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caplan, Bryan. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hayek, F.A. [1931] 1935. Prices and Production. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. ———. [1937] 1948. Economics and Knowledge. In Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, chapter 2.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 1945. The Use of Knowledge in Society. The American Economic Review 35 (4): 519–530.Google Scholar
  20. ———. [1946] 1948. The Meaning of Competition. In Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, chapter 5.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1973. Law, Legislation, and Liberty, Vol.1: Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. ———. [1968] 2002. Competition as a Discovery Procedure, The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 5(3): 9–23.Google Scholar
  25. ———. [1974] 2016. The Pretense of Knowledge. In Mainline Economics: Six Nobel Lectures in the Tradition of Adam Smith, ed. Peter J. Boettke, Stefanie Haeffele-Balch, and Virgil Henry Storr. Arlington: Mercatus Center.Google Scholar
  26. Katznelson, Ira, and Barry R. Weingast, eds. 2007. Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection Between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Klein, Peter G., Joseph T. Mahoney, Anita M. McGahan, and Christos N. Pitelis. 2010. Toward a Theory of Public Entrepreneurship. European Management Review 7 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Landemore, Hélène. 2013. Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lucas, Robert E., Jr. 1976. Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique. In The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets, ed. Karl Brunner and Alan Meltzer. Amsterdam: North-Holland, Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, Gary J. 1992. Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mises, Ludwig von. [1920] 1935. Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth. In Collectivist Economic Planning, ed. F.A. Hayek and Trans. S. Alder, 87–130. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. ———. [1922] 1951. Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  33. ———. [1949] 1998. Human Action. Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  34. Mueller, Dennis C. 2003. Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Driscoll, Gerald P. 1977. Economics as a Coordination Problem: The Contributions of Friedrich A. Hayek. Kansas: Sheed Andrews and McMeel. Retrieved Liberty Fund’s Online Library of Liberty.Google Scholar
  36. Oakerson, Ronald J., and Roger B. Parks. 1988. Citizen Voice and Public Entrepreneurship: The Organizational Dynamic of a Complex Metropolitan County. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 18 (4): 91–112.Google Scholar
  37. Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 1993. Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development. American Political Science Review 87 (3): 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ostrom, Vincent. 1980. Artisanship and Artifact. Public Administration Review 40 (4): 309–317.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3110256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ———. 1987. The Political Theory of a Compound Republic. Lincoln/London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  41. ———. 1993. Epistemic Choice and Public Choice. Public Choice 77 (1): 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. ———. 1997. The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerability of Democracies: A Response to Tocqueville’s Challenge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ostrom, Elinor. 1998. A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action. American Political Science Review 92 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ostrom, Vincent. 1999. Polycentricity (Part 1 and 2). In Polycentricity and Local Public Economies, ed. Michael D. McGinnis, 52–74 and 119–138. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  45. Ostrom, Elinor. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 2010. Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. American Economic Review 100 (3): 641–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. ———. 2014. Do Institutions for Collective Action Evolve? Journal of Bioeconomics 16 (1): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ostrom, Vincent, and Elinor Ostrom. 1971. Public Choice: A Different Approach to the Study of Public Administration. Public Administration Review 31 (2): 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ostrom, Elinor, and Vincent Ostrom. 2004. The Quest for Meaning in Public Choice. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 63 (1): 105–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pettit, Philip. 2012. On the People’s Terms: a Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Polanyi, Michael. 1962. The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory. Minerva 1 (1): 54–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  53. Rubin, Paul H. 2001. Ideology. In The Elgar Companion to Public Choice, ed. William F. Shughart and Laura Razzolini. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  54. Schumpeter, Joseph. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Shughart, William F., and Laura Razzolini. 2001. The Elgar Companion to Public Choice. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Simmons, Randy T. 2011. Beyond Politics: The Roots of Government Failure. Oakland: The Independent Institute.Google Scholar
  57. Smith, Adam. [1776] 1981. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Ed. R. H. Campbell and A. S. Skinner. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  58. Smith, Vernon L. 2007. Rationality in Economics: Constructivist and Ecological Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tullock, Gordon. 1966. The Organization of Inquiry. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Tullock, Gordon, Arthur Seldon, and Gordon L. Brady. 2002. Government Failure: A Primer in Public Choice. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
  61. Wagner, Richard E. 1966. Pressure Groups and Political Entrepreneurs: A Review Article. Papers on Non-Market Decision Making 1 (1): 161–170.Google Scholar
  62. White, Lawrence H. 2012. Clash of Economic Ideas: The Great Policy Debates and Experiments of the Last Hundred Years. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Winston, Clifford. 2006. Market Failure vs. Government Failure. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  64. Wohlgemuth, Michael. 2002. Democracy and Opinion Falsification: Towards a New Austrian Political Economy. Constitutional Political Economy 13 (3): 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Boettke
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.F. A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics and Economics Mercatus CenterGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations