Child Caring Moralities and Market Organisation
In this chapter, I examine the implications of being a commercial practitioner in a field where moralities feature strongly, precisely because the teleoaffective structuration of child caring, in which commercial agents play a very active role, leads to the ‘fixing’ of distinct understandings of the young child that in turn circumscribe the possibilities for economic action. I present an analysis of how the practices of commercial organisations are infused with the moral concerns of child caring. I commence with a discussion of an episode of moral disruption, which started with the transformation of the chemical compound Bisphenol A into a health hazard in 2008, and which created commotion in the business of infant feeding tools. In my analysis, I work through this ‘episode’ in a temporal way, attending to the issues that characterised the start of this new ‘scare’, the ways in which companies responded, and how moral stability returned in the aftermath. I then move on to discuss two other ways in which morality is evident in commercial practices. The first considers the interactions between commercial practitioners at consumer exhibitions, and reflects on how moral worth manifests itself through gossip. This is followed by a brief discussion of product standards, which evidences formal modes of governance of commercial practices and responsibility. In the final section of this chapter, I argue that the organisational features of commercial communicative practices; the techno-medical-science density, the pedagogical content, and the management of ‘the face’ in exchange interactions, may be read as institutionalised responses to the discourse of childhood.
- Bergmann, J.R. 1993. Discreet indiscretions: The social organization of gossip. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Callon, M. (ed.). 1998. The laws of the markets. Oxford: Sociological Review/Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Cook, D.T. (ed.). 2008. Lived experiences of public consumption: Encounters with value in marketplaces on five continents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. 1990. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Hochschild, A.R. 2003. The commercialization of intimate life: Notes from home and work. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, N. 1982. Trust and power. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Martens, L. 2009. Creating the ethical parent-consumer subject: Commerce, moralities and pedagogies in early parenthood. In Critical Pedagogies of Consumption: Living and Learning in the Shadow of the “Shopocalypse”, ed. J.A. Sandlin and P. McLaren. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health, National Institutes of Health Audit of literature cited and fidelity of requested changes to draft Bisphenol A expert panel reports. Released July 24, 2007. Available at: http://cerhr.niehs.nih.gov/chemicals/bisphenol/bisphenol-eval.html.
- Pyyhtinen, A. 2016. More-than-human sociology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Sayer, A. 2006. Approaching moral economy. In The moralization of the markets, ed. N. Stehr, C. Henning, and B. Weiler, 77–100. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- VOICE Group. 2010a. Buying into motherhood? Problematic consumption and ambivalence in transitional phases. Consumption, Markets and Culture 13 (4): 373–397.Google Scholar
- VOICE Group. 2010b. Motherhood, marketization, and consumer vulnerability. Journal of Macromarketing 30 (4): 384–397.Google Scholar