Advertisement

Challenging Intellectural Colonialism: The Rarely Noticed Question of Methodological Tribalism in Language Research

  • Finex Ndhlovu
  • Tomasz Kamusella
Chapter

Abstract

This concluding chapter extends the definitional understanding of the notion of tribalism and uses it to probe the limits and pitfalls of mainstream sociolinguistic methodological and conceptual approaches that bear the hallmarks of colonially invented or -imposed notions of ‘tribes,’ ‘tribalism’ and ‘standard languages.’ The overall intention is to suggest alternative and quite contemporary theorization on language and society, which could help scholars push back the frontiers of colonially inherited understandings of language that do not sit well with the real language practices of real people in everyday real life in southern Africa. A major line of argument advanced is that the genealogy of all ‘named’ (i.e., officially recognized and shaped as entities in its own right, or Einzelsprache) African languages, including those covered in the preceding chapters of this volume, takes us back to the colonial archives of western knowledges about Africa and African identities and of indigenous knowledges that were suppressed, erased or lost under colonial rule. The chapter concludes by calling for a conscious epistemological turnaround in scholarly debates and research on the social and political histories of African languages.

Keywords

Tribalism Standard languages Intellectual colonialism Philosophy of language Official languages Named languages Colonial archives of knowledge 

References

  1. Asimova, B. (1982). Iazykovoe stroitel’stvo v Tadzhikistane, 1920–1940 [Language Engineering in Tajikistan, 1920–1940]. Dushanbe: Donish.Google Scholar
  2. Bassiouney, R. (2009). Arabic Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergne, P. (2007). The birth of Tajikistan: National identity and the origins of the Republic. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  4. Blanchard, P., Boetsch, G., & Snoep, N. J. (2011). Human zoos: The invention of the savage. Arles/Paris: Actes Sud/Musée du Quai Branly.Google Scholar
  5. Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brutt-Griffler, J. (2006). Language endangerment, the construction of indigenous languages and world English. In M. Pütz, J. A. Fishman, & J. A. N. Aertselaer (Eds.), Along the routes to power: Explorations of empowerment through language (pp. 35–54). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  7. Burke, P. (2012). A social history of knowledge (Vol 2: From the Encyclopédie to Wikipedia). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  8. Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Chimhundu, H. (1992). Early missionaries and the ethnolinguistic factor during the invention of Tribalism in Zimbabwe. Journal of African History, 44(1), 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chimhundu, H. (2005). Introduction to the photographic reprint of the report on the unification of Shona dialects. Harare: ALLEX Project, African Languages Research Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Codes for the Representation of Names of Scripts. (2016). unicode.org/iso15924/iso15924-codes.html. Accessed 1 Aug 2016.
  12. Doke, C. M. (1931). Report on the unification of Shona dialects. Hartford: Stephen Austin and Sons.Google Scholar
  13. Errington, J. (2008). Linguistics in a colonial world: A story of language, meaning, and power. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15(2), 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forkl, H., & Frenken, W. (1989). Kitaba und Nsibidi Schriftsysteme und Mnemozeichen aus Afrika und dem Orient. Katalog zur gleichnamigen Ausstellung bei Buch Julius. Stuttgart: Buch Julius.Google Scholar
  16. Greenberg, R. (2004). Language and identity in the Balkans: Serbo-Croatian and its disintegration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hirsch, F. (2005). Empire of nations: ethnographic knowledge and the making of the Soviet Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Holes, C. (2004). Modern Arabic: Structures, functions, and varieties. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Isaev, M. (1979). Iazykovoe stroitel’stvo v SSSR [Language Engineering in the USSR]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
  20. ISO 639. (2016). Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_639. Accessed 1 Aug 2016.
  21. Justice, M. C. (1977). Biafra: A study in national self-determination and tribalism in Nigeria. MA thesis, Texas Women’s University, Denton.Google Scholar
  22. Kamusella, T. (2012). The global regime of language recognition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 218, 59–86.Google Scholar
  23. Kamusella, T. (2014). Creating languages in Central Europe during the last millennium. Basingstoke: Palgrave Pivot.Google Scholar
  24. Kellner-Heinkele, B., & Landau, J. M. (2012). Language politics in contemporary Central Asia: National and ethnic identity and the Soviet legacy. London: I B Tauris.Google Scholar
  25. Kuper, A. (1988). The invention of primitive society: Transformations of an illusion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Likaka, O. (2009). Naming colonialism history and collective memory in the Congo, 1870–1960, Africa and the diaspora: History, politics, culture. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lynch, J., Ross, M., & Crowley, T. (2002). The Oceanic languages. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
  28. MacGaffey, W. (1982). The policy of national integration in Zaïre. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 20(1), 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Makoni, S. (1998). African languages as European scripts: The shaping of communal memory. In S. Nuttall & C. Coetzee (Eds.), Negating the past: The making of memory in South Africa (pp. 242–248). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mamdani, M. (2012). Define and rule: Native as political identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin, T. (2001). The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ndhlovu, F. (2006). Gramsci, Doke and the marginalisation of the Ndebele language in Zimbabwe. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 27(4), 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ndhlovu, F. (2008). The conundrums of language policy and politics in South Africa and Zimbabwe. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 21(1), 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ndhlovu, F. (2009). The politics of language and nation building in Zimbabwe. Oxford/Bern: Peter Lang AG.Google Scholar
  35. Ndhlovu, F. (2010). Language politics in postcolonial Africa revisited: Minority agency and language imposition. Language Matters, 41(2), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ndhlovu, F. (2013). Beyond neo-liberal instructional models: Why multilingual instruction matters for South African skills development. International Journal of Language Studies, 7(3), 33–58.Google Scholar
  37. Ndhlovu, F. (2014). Becoming an African diaspora in Australia: Language, culture, identity. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ndhlovu, F. (2015). Ignored lingualism: Another resource for overcoming the monolingual mindset in educational linguistics. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 35(4), 398–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ndhlovu, F. (2017). Language, diaspora, immigrants: Challenging the big battalions of groupism. In O. García, N. Flores, & M. Spotti (Eds.), Oxford handbook of language and society (pp. 141–159). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Otsuji, E., & Pennycook, A. (2010). Metrolingualism: Fixity, fluidity and language flux. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(3), 250–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pennycook, A. (2000). Language, ideology and hindsight: Lessons from colonial language policies. In T. Ricento (Ed.), Ideology, politics and language policies (pp. 49–66). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Pennycook, A., & Makoni, S. (2005). The modern mission: The language effects of christianity. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 4(2), 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Piccardo, E. (2013). Plurilingualism and curriculum design: Toward a synergic vision. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 600–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Piller, I. (2011). Intercultural communication: A critical introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Ranger, T. O. (1985). The invention of tribalism in Zimbabwe, Mambo occasional papers: Socio-economic series (Vol. 19). Gweru: Mambo Press.Google Scholar
  47. Ranger, T. O. (1989). Missionaries, migrants and the Manyika: The invention of ethnicity in Zimbabwe. In L. Vail (Ed.), The creation of tribalism in Southern Africa (pp. 118–150). London: James Currey.Google Scholar
  48. Stoll, D. (1982). Fishers of men or founders of empire? The Wycliffe Bible translators in Latin America. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
  49. Tollefson, J. W. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in the community. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  50. Žemaitis, A. (2012). Pasaulio raštų sistemos [The world’s writing systems]. Vilnius: Vaga.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Finex Ndhlovu
    • 1
  • Tomasz Kamusella
    • 2
  1. 1.University of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  2. 2.School of HistoryUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations