Abstract
Multinational corporations conduct internal investigations when unresolved questions regarding employee behaviour require attention. The company’s internal investigator identifies the employees involved, then compiles and documents testimonies, descriptions and contextual information that may eventually confirm or disprove allegations. The purpose of the investigation is to allow the company authorities to take decisions about which action to take and policies to form regarding that particular incidence. The problems investigated mostly concern matters of company security — involving employee behaviour in breach of company policy. Accusations can range from: employee misconduct, fraud, harassment, code violations, alleged threats and physical injury, to bribery, blackmail or general issues of non-compliance that can result in employee dismissal. When an internal complaint or suspected rule violation by an employee is detected and reported, a regional company investigator, typically known as the Business Practices Officer (BPO), interviews the parties involved, and sends findings in an investigative report to the offices of the company’s Head of International Security (HIS). This office, along with the offices of International Legal Compliance and Corporate Security, make a final decision on what actions to take or policies to create. The report, normally undergoes final editing by the company at this stage, and is filed for internal reference.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, P.V. (2011). Technical Communication: A Reader-centred Approach. Boston: Thomson/Wadsworth.
Bhatia, V. (2008). Genre Analysis, ESP and Professional Practice. English for Specific Purposes 27. 2: 161–74.
Bhatia, V.K. (2010). Interdiscursivity in Professional Communication. Discourse & Communication 4. 1: 32–50.
Biggs, M. (2001). Just the Facts: Investigative Report Writing. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001.
Boveé, C.L., Thill, J.V., & Schatzman, B.E. (2004). Business Communication Essentials. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Breeze, R. (2013). Traversing Legal Narratives. Narratives in Academic and Professional Genres. Bern: Peter Lang, 344–62.
Butt, P., & Castle, R. (2013). Modern Legal Drafting: A Guide to Using Clearer Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Engberg, J., & Arinas Pellón, I. (2011). The Secret to Legal Foretelling: Generic and Inter-generic Aspects of Vagueness in Contracts, Patents and Regulations. International Journal of English Studies 11. 1: 55–74.
Flowerdew, L. (2008). Determining Discourse-based Moves in Professional Reports. In. Corpora and Discourse: The Challenges of Different Settings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub., 117–131.
Garner, B.A. (2013). Legal Writing in Plain English: A Text with Exercises. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Garzone, G., & Gotti, M. (2011). Realisations of Intertextuality, Interdiscursivity and Hybridisation in the Discourses of Professionals. In G. Garzone and M. Gotti (Eds), Tension and Change in Domain-specific Genres. Discourse, Communication and the Enterprise. Genres and Trends. Peter Lang, Bern, 91–110.
Garzone, G., & Degano, C. (2012). Voices in Arbitration Awards:Polyphony and Language Reports. Discourse and Practice in International Commercial Arbitration Issues, Challenges and Prospects. Surrey: Ashgate, 179–208.
Guffey, M.E. (2003). Business Communication Process and Product. Mason: Thomson South-Western.
Hutton, Christopher. Word Meaning and Legal Interpretation: An Introductory Guide. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
Knoke, M.E. (2010). Professional Investigator’s Manual. Alexandria, VA: ASIS International (Kindle file).
Matoesian, G.M. (2001). Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mazzi, D. (2007). Reporting Verbs: A Tool for a Polyphonic Reading of Judgements. Studien Zur Rechtskommunikation. Bern: Peter Lang.
Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Schmedemann, D.A. & Kunz, C.L. (1999). Synthesis: Legal Reading, Reasoning, and Writing. Gaithersburg: Aspen Law & Business.
Shuy, R.W. (1998). The Language of Confession, Interrogation and Deception. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Warren, M. (2009). “‘Just Spoke to’: The Types and Directionality of Intertextuality in Professional Discourse.” English for Specific Purposes 32. 1 (2013): 12–24.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Glen Michael Alessi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alessi, G.M. (2016). Standardizing the Language of Corporate Internal Investigative Reports: Linguistic Perspectives on Professional Writing Practices. In: Alessi, G.M., Jacobs, G. (eds) The Ins and Outs of Business and Professional Discourse Research. Communicating in Professions and Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137507686_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137507686_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50767-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50768-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)