Abstract
Neo-authoritarianism is a subject of hot debate among Chinese scholars in the late 1980s and has been quietly endorsed by the CCP. Neoauthoritarianism refers to an enlightened autocracy: a strong leader adopts undemocratic measures to enforce economic development. Law and order are maintained, according to the will of the ruler, as crucial conditions for modernization. This political blueprint has been in part justified by the economic miracles of the “Four Asian Tigers,” namely Taiwan, Hong Kong, South Korea, and Singapore. Some Chinese scholars argue that neo-authoritarianism is a necessary stage as China transits from a traditional autocracy to liberal democracy.1 The discourse on neo-authoritarianism died down at the turn of the century, but has resurfaced since Xi Jinping assumed the leadership of the CCP in 2012. The first section of this chapter examines the theoretical roots of neo-authoritarianism. The second section discusses the debates among Chinese scholars on neo-authoritarianism, and then it explains the transition from neo-authoritarianism to neo-conservatism. The last section of this chapter explores relationship between neoauthoritarianism and official ideology and its impacts on political changes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Wu Jiaxiang, “The Study Scheme for Neo-Authoritarianism,” in Liu Jun and Li Lin, eds., Neo-Authoritarianism: The Debate about Theoretical Guidance of Reform (Beijing: Beijing Economics Institute Press, 1989), 52–60.
Barry Sautman, “Sirens of the Strongman: Neo-Authoritarianism in Recent Chinese Political Theory,” China Quarterly, 129 (March 1992): 72–102.
Deng Ziqiang, “Concerning Controversial Views on Neo-authoritarianism,” in Michel Oksenberg, Lawrence R. Sullivan, and Marc Lambert, eds., Beijing Spring, 1989: Confrontation and Conflict: The Basic Documents (Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 1990), 126–27.
Samuel Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968), 7–8.
Michael J. Sullivan, “The Impact of Western Political Thought in Chinese Political Discourse on Transitions from Leninism, 1986–1992,” World Affairs, 157, no. 2 (Fall 1994): 79–91.
Shu Yun Ma “The Rise and Fall of Neo-Authoritarianism in China,” China Information, 5, no. 3 (Winter 1990–1991): 4.
Samuel Huntington, “The Change to Change,” Comparative Politics, 3 (1971): 283–322.
David Shambaugh, China’s Communist Party: Atrophy & Adaptation; American and European Relations with China (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2008), 93.
Alan Dupont, “Is There an ‘Asian Way,’” Survival, 38, no. 2 (1996): 13–33.
Tsai Wen-hui, “New Authoritarianism, Neo-Conservatism and Anti-Peaceful Evolution: Mainland China’s Resistance to Political Modernization,” Issues & Studies, 28, no. 12 (December 1992): 5.
Andre Laliberte and Marc Lanteigne, The Chinese Party-State in the 21st Century: Adaptation and the Reinvention (New York: Routledge, 2008), 147.
Yan Bofei, “Abandon Utopianism,” Dushu, 2 (1989): 6.
Xiao Gongqin and Zhu Wei, “New Authoritarianism: A Painful Dilemma,” Wenhui Bao, 17 January 1989.
Liu Qingfeng, “The Topography of Intellectual Culture in 1990s Mainland China: A Survey,” in Gloria Davies, ed., Voicing Concerns: Contemporary Chinese Critical Inquiry (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001), 62.
Qin Xiaoying, “Escaping from a Historical Cycle,” Chinese Sociology and Anthropology, 23, no. 4 (Summer 1991): 7–30.
Michael Twohey, Authority and Welfare in China: Modern Debates in Historical Perspective (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999), 156–57.
Barrett L. McCormick and David Kelly, “Limits of Anti-Liberalism,” Journal of Asian Studies, 53, no. 3 (1994): 821.
Liu Jun and Li Lin, eds., Xinquanweizhuyi [Neo Authoritarianism] (Beijing: Jingjixueyuan chubanshe, 1989).
Michael J. Sullivan, “The Impact of Western Political Thought in Chinese Political Discourse on Transitions from Leninism, 1986–1992,” World Affairs, 157, no. 2 (Fall 1994): 79–91.
David Kelly, “China: Major Ideological Trends of 1995,” in Joseph Y.S. Cheng, ed., China in the Post-Deng Era (Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 1998), 70.
Yu Xunda and Xu Siqin, eds., Minzhu, minzhuhua yu zhilijixiao [Democracy, Democratization, and Governance Effect] (Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2011), 117–53.
Andrew J. Nathan, “China’s Political Trajectory: What Are the Chinese Saying?” in Cheng Li, ed., China’s Changing Political Landscape (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2008), 25.
John Makeham, Lost Soul: “Confucianism” in Contemporary Chinese Academic Discourse (Cambridge: The Harvard University Asia Center, 2008), 197.
Tang Liang, Is Democratisation in China Possible? The Authoritarian Path to Development (New York: Routledge, 2014).
Chris Buckley, “Xi, in ‘Godfather’ Mold, Looks Assertive and Even Imperial,” New York Time, 15 November 2013.
Zhang Weiwei, Zhongguo zhenhan: Yige “wenmingxing guojia” de jueqi (Beijing: Shiji chubanshe, 2011), 55.
William A. Callahan, China Dreams: 20 Visions of the Future (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), 149.
Liu Junning, Baoshou zhuyi (Conservatism) (Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 1998), 9.
Gan Yang and Xudong Zhang, “Critique of Chinese Conservatism in the 1990s,” Social Text, 16, no. 2 (Summer, 1998): 46.
Yang Zhong, “Legitimacy Crisis and Legitimation in China,” Journal of Contemporary Asia, 26, no. 2 (1996): 215.
Yu Keping, Democracy Is a Good Thing: Essays on Politics, Society, and Culture in Contemporary China (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008), 4.
Yongnian Zheng, “Development and Democracy: Are they Compatible in China?” Political Science Quarterly, 109, no. 2 (1994): 248.
Li Zehou and Liu Zaifu, Gaobie geming: huiwang ershi shiji zhongguo [Farewell to Revolution: Looking Back Upon China of the Twentieth Century] (Hong Kong: Tiandi tushu youxian gongsi, 1995), 55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 He Li
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, H. (2015). Neo-authoritarianism. In: Political Thought and China’s Transformation. Politics and Development of Contemporary China. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137427816_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137427816_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49123-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-42781-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)