Abstract
Since the turn of the new century, there has been an explosion of popular constitutional discourse in China. However, the courts seem curiously absent from this emergence. Standard constitutional thought, at least as it comes out of the Anglo-American world, tends to view neutral and independent courts—and in particular “judicial review”—as the centerpiece of a functional constitutional system. Is China a case of “constitutionalism without courts?” (cf Dowdle 2002). Or does the apparent lack of judicial presence in this new discourse render this discourse developmentally meaningless, a mere anomaly in a larger trajectory that is fatally stalled? (see Pei 2006).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2009 Stéphanie Balme and Michael W. Dowdle
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balme, S., Dowdle, M.W. (2009). Beyond “Judicial Power”: Courts and Constitutionalism in Modern China. In: Balme, S., Dowdle, M.W. (eds) Building Constitutionalism in China. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230623958_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230623958_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36978-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62395-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)