Skip to main content

U.S. Policy and Sino-Japanese Rivalry

  • Chapter
China and Japan at Odds

Abstract

Although tension on the Korean peninsula and in the Taiwan Strait are usually identified as East Asia’s most prominent flash points, rivalry between China and Japan may be the key to peaceful and stable relationships in that region. Sino-Japanese relations have blown hot and cold in cycles ever since the 1950s. Direct conflict has never been a serious possibility, but tensions have frequently run high, and national feelings have been used by both countries to manipulate the behavior of the other. Even today, when the Chinese and Japanese economies are closely intertwined, it is commonly thought that the rivalry is more intense than ever—jing re zheng leng (economically hot, politically cold), as the Chinese say—and dangerous for that reason.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asahi Shimbun. 2004. Asahi Shimbun (Tokyo, English ed.), December 13. http://www.asahi.com.

  • — 2005. Constitutional revision: The LDP apparently put off debate on Article 9, Asahi Shimbun (Tokyo), October 31. http://www.asahi.com/english.

  • Baker, James A., III. 1991–1992. America in Asia, Foreign Affairs 70, no. 5 (Winter): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, James. 2005. Japan’s ties Tto China: Strong trade, shaky politics, New York Times, February 22, p. A9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, Richard C. 2005. Untying the knot: Making peace in the Taiwan Strait. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Mumin. 2005. Going global: The Chinese elite’s views of security strategy in the 1990s, Asian Perspective 29 (2): 133–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, Edward. 2005. Asian leaders agree to new 16-nation association, Washington Post, December 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faiola, Anthony. 2005. Japan to join U.S. policy on Taiwan, Washington Post, February 18, p. A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funabashi, Yoichi. 1991–1992. Japan and the new world order, Foreign Affairs 70 (5): 58–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurtov, Mel. 2002. Pacific Asia? Prospects for security and cooperation in East Asia. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurtov, Mel, and PeterVan Ness, eds. 2005. Confronting the Bush doctrine: Critical view from the Asia-Pacific. London: RoutledgeCurzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Selig S. 2005a. “Did North Korea Cheat?” Foreign Affairs 84, no. 1 (January–February): 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 2005a. Seabed petroleum in Northeast Asia: Conflict or cooperation? Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, Robert M., and Wilson Lee, eds. 2003. George W. Bush and Asia: A midterm assessment. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosokawa, Morihiro. 1998. Are U.S. troops in Japan needed? Foreign Affairs 77, no. 4 (July–August): 2–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Wenran. 2005. Japan dips its toe in the Taiwan Strait. YaleGlobal. http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=5362.

  • Johnson, Chalmers. 2005. No longer the “Lone” superpower: Coming to terms with China. Japan Policy Research Institute Working Paper No. 105 (March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Chalmers, and E. B. Keehn. 1995. The Pentagon’s ossified strategy. Foreign Affairs 74, no. 4 (July–August): 103–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Alastair Ian. 2004. China’s international relations: The political and security dimensions. In The international relations of Northeast Asia, ed. Samuel S. Kim. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Samuel S., ed. 2000. East Asia and globalization. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 2004. The international relations of Northeast Asia. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klare, Michael T. 2005. Revving up the China threat, The Nation (October 24): 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFeber, Walter. 1997. The clash: U.S.-Japanese relations throughout history. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam Peng Er. 2005. Japan’s deteriorating ties with China: The Koizumi factor, China: An International Journal 3, no. 2 (September): 275–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, Robyn. 2005. The U.S. puts Japan on probation, Far Eastern Economic Review 168, no. 10 (November): 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masaki, Hisane. 2005. Where is Japan heading? JapanFocus (November 14): 1–8. http://japanfocus.org/article.asp?id=448.

  • Meyer, Peggy Falkenheim. 1999. Sino-Japanese relations: The economic-security nexus. In Politics and economic in Northeast Asia: Nationalism and regionalism in contention, ed. Tsuneo Akaha, 135–57. New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Thomas G. 2000. China and globalization. In East Asia and globalization, ed. Samuel S. Kim, 105–31. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mufson, Steven. 2001. Clash with China strengthens hard-liners, Washington Post, April 23, online ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times. 2002. National Security Strategy of the United States, New York Times, September 20. http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/20/international/20STEXT_FULL.html.

  • — 2003. New York Times, January 26, p. 15

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Joseph S., Jr. 1995. The case for deep engagement. Foreign Affairs 74, no. 4 (July–August): 90–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurtov, Mel. 2002. Pacific Asia? Prospects for security and cooperation in East Asia. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurtov, Mel, and PeterVan Ness, eds. 2005. Confronting the Bush doctrine: Critical view from the Asia-Pacific. London: RoutledgeCurzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Selig S. 2005a. “Did North Korea Cheat?” Foreign Affairs 84, no. 1 (January–February): 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 2005a. Seabed petroleum in Northeast Asia: Conflict or cooperation? Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, Robert M., and Wilson Lee, eds. 2003. George W. Bush and Asia: A midterm assessment. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosokawa, Morihiro. 1998. Are U.S. troops in Japan needed? Foreign Affairs 77, no. 4 (July–August): 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Wenran. 2005. Japan dips its toe in the Taiwan Strait. YaleGlobal. http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=5362.

  • Johnson, Chalmers. 2005. No longer the “Lone” superpower: Coming to terms with China. Japan Policy Research Institute Working Paper No. 105 (March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Chalmers, and E. B. Keehn. 1995. The Pentagon’s ossified strategy. Foreign Affairs 74, no. 4 (July–August): 103–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Alastair Ian. 2004. China’s international relations: The political and security dimensions. In The international relations of Northeast Asia, ed. Samuel S. Kim. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Samuel S., ed. 2000. East Asia and globalization. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 2004. The international relations of Northeast Asia. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klare, Michael T. 2005. Revving up the China threat, The Nation (October 24): 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFeber, Walter. 1997. The clash: U.S.-Japanese relations throughout history. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam Peng Er. 2005. Japan’s deteriorating ties with China: The Koizumi factor, China: An International Journal 3, no. 2 (September): 275–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, Robyn. 2005. The U.S. puts Japan on probation, Far Eastern Economic Review 168, no. 10 (November): 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masaki, Hisane. 2005. Where is Japan heading? JapanFocus (November 14): 1–8. http://japanfocus.org/article.asp?id=448.

  • Meyer, Peggy Falkenheim. 1999. Sino-Japanese relations: The economic-security nexus. In Politics and economic in Northeast Asia: Nationalism and regionalism in contention, ed. Tsuneo Akaha, 135–57. New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Thomas G. 2000. China and globalization. In East Asia and globalization, ed. Samuel S. Kim, 105–31. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mufson, Steven. 2001. Clash with China strengthens hard-liners, Washington Post, April 23, online ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times. 2002. National Security Strategy of the United States, New York Times, September 20. http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/20/international/20STEXT_FULL.html.

  • — 2003. New York Times, January 26, p. 15

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Joseph S., Jr. 1995. The case for deep engagement. Foreign Affairs 74, no. 4 (July–August): 90–102.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

James C. Hsiung

Copyright information

© 2007 James C. Hsiung

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gurtov, M. (2007). U.S. Policy and Sino-Japanese Rivalry. In: Hsiung, J.C. (eds) China and Japan at Odds. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230607118_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics