Abstract
It’s interesting how very similar lesson plans carried out by two teachers with totally different beliefs actually lead to formally similar lessons but with very different class atmospheres
The above extract comes from a diary I kept during a three-year case study of two EFL teachers working in Italy, Charlotte and Linda. The diary extract would seem to indicate that teachers can give lessons that are very similar in their organisation and yet are somehow very different in what we might call the social affective climate of the classroom (Legukte and Thomas 1991). In this chapter we will look first of all at the beliefs that two experienced teachers hold about teaching and learning and then investigate whether their beliefs can be seen to influence the interaction patterns that they set up, and thereby go some way towards accounting for the differences in their classrooms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allwright, D. 1993. ‘Integrating “research” and “pedagogy”: appropriate criteria and practical possibilities’. In J. Edge, and K. Richards (eds), Teachers Develop Teachers Research. Oxford: Heinemann, pp. 125–35.
Allwright, D. 2003. ‘Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching’. Language Teaching Researc., 7: 113–41.
Binnie Smith, D. 1996. ‘Teacher decision making in the adult ESL classroom’. In D. Freeman and J. C. Richards (eds), Teacher Learning in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–216.
Borg, S. 2003. ‘Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe and do’. Language Teachin., 36: 81–109.
Breen, M. P., Hird, B., Milton, M., Oliver, R., and Thwaite, A. 2001. ‘Making sense of language teaching: Teachers’ principles and classroom practices’. Applied Linguistic., 22(4): 470–501.
Burns, A. 1992. ‘Teacher beliefs and their influence on classroom practice’. Prospec., 7(3): 56–66.
Cullen, R. 2002. ‘Supportive teacher talk: The importance of the F-move’. ELT Journal, 56(2): 117–27.
Drew, P. and Heritage, J. 1992. ‘Analyzing talk at work: An introduction’. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds), Talk at Wor.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–65.
Edge, J. and Richards, K. 1998. ‘Why best practice is not good enough’. TESOL Quarterl., 32 (3): 569–76.
Garton, S. 2002. ‘Learner initiative and classroom interaction’. ELT Journa., 56 (1): 47–56.
Huberman, M. 1992. ‘Teacher development and instructional mastery’. In A. Hargreaves and M. G. Fullan (eds), Understanding Teacher Developmen.. London: Cassells, pp. 122–42.
Johnson, K. E. 1994. ‘The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of pre-service English as a Second Language teachers’. Teaching and Teacher Educatio., 10 (4): 439–52.
Legukte, M. and Thomas, H. 1991. Process and Experience in the Language Classroo.. Harlow: Longman.
Nassaji, H. and Wells, G. 2000. ‘What’s the use of “triadic dialogue”: An investigation of teacher-student interaction’. Applied Linguistic., 21 (3): 376–406.
Richards, K. 2003. Qualitative Inquiry in TESO.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discours.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woods, D. 1991. ‘Teachers’ interpretations of second language teaching curricula’. RELC Journa., 22 (2): 1 – 18.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Sue Garton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Garton, S. (2008). Teacher Beliefs and Interaction in the Language Classroom. In: Garton, S., Richards, K. (eds) Professional Encounters in TESOL. Communicating in Professions and Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594173_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594173_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36327-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59417-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)