Abstract
This chapter proposes that sexuality education research and practice is caught in a cul-de-sac of predictable questions and answers that have constrained its development as an innovative curriculum area and field of research. It argues that this field’s most enduring and pertinent issues are often articulated in a series of regulating binaries such as ‘Is content appropriate/inappropriate?’ or ‘Are programmes effective/ineffective?’ These binaries produce a number of stalemates in sexuality education between, for instance, secular and religious perspectives, that fail to satisfy either group. The theoretical paradigm of new materialism, employed throughout the ensuing chapters, is introduced as a way to think differently about sexuality education’s current challenges. The research methodology undertaken in the book is also introduced.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
I deliberately meld the use of queer here as human identity, a radical deconstructive theoretical tool, and a more general invocation of ‘odd’ and ‘troublesome’. This usage corresponds with the chapter’s mobilisation of ‘queer’ as ‘an array of critical operations’ (Cohen, 2008, p. 372). In the last line, sexuality education is queered further, by turning it into a person, rendering it a ‘queer subject’ that blurs boundaries between queer as an identity and this curricular area.
- 2.
- 3.
Aotearoa-New Zealand is the name given to New Zealand throughout this book. Aotearoa is the Maori word for New Zealand. Placing it before New Zealand recognises Maori as the indigenous people, who preceded Pakeha (non-Maori of European descent) in making this country their home.
- 4.
Years 12 and 13 are the last two years of secondary schooling in Aotearoa-New Zealand.
- 5.
In Aotearoa-New Zealand, decile rankings indicate the extent to which a school draws students from low socioeconomic communities, with decile 1 schools containing the highest proportion of these students and decile 10 the lowest (Ministry of Education, 2016).
References
Adams St. Pierre, E. A. (2016). Rethinking the empirical in the posthuman. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 25–36). Houndmills: Palgrave.
Alldred, P., & David, M. (2007). Get real about sex: The politics and practice of sex education. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Allen, L. (2005). Sexual subjects: Young people, sexuality and schooling. Houndmills: Palgrave.
Allen, L. (2009). Caught in the act: Ethics committee review and researching the sexual culture of schools. Qualitative Research, 9(4), 395–410.
Allen, L. (2011). Young people and sexuality education: Rethinking key debates. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Allen, L. (2017). Schooling sexual cultures: Visual research and sexuality education. New York: Routledge.
Allen, L., Rasmussen, M., & Quinlivan, K. (2014). The politics of pleasure in sexuality education: Pleasure bound. New York: Routledge.
Allen, L., Rasmussen, M., Quinlivan, K., Aspin, C., Sanjakdar, F., & Brömdal, N. (2013). Who’s afraid of sex at school? The politics of researching culture, religion and sexuality at school. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 37(4), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.754006
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bennett, J. (2004). The Force of Things: Steps Towards an Ecology of Matter. Political Theory, 32(3), 347–372.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Clough, P. (2009). The new empiricism: Affect and sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory, 12, 43–61.
Cohen, J. (2008). An unfinished conversation about glowing green bunnies. In N. Giffney & M. Hird (Eds.), Queerying the non/human (pp. 363–375). Burlington, Hampshire: Ashgate.
Collier, J., & Collier, M. (1986). Visual anthropology: Photography as research method. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Davies, B. (2016). Ethics and the new materialism: A brief genealogy of the ‘post’ philosophies in the social sciences. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2016.1234682
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987 [1980]). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). New materialism: Interviews and cartographies. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.
Garcia, L., & Fields, J. (2017). Renewed commitments in a time of vigilance: Sexuality education in the USA. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 17(4), 1–11.
Giffney, N., & Hird, M. (2008). Introduction: Queering the non/human. In N. Giffney & M. Hird (Eds.), Queerying the non/human (pp. 1–16). Burlington, Hampshire: Ashgate.
Goldman, J. (2008). Responding to parental objections to school sexuality education: A selection of 12 objections. Sex Education, 8(4), 415–438.
Hall, D., & Jagose, A. (Eds.). (2013). The Routledge queer studies reader. Abingdon: Routledge.
Harper, D. (1988). Visual sociology: Expanding sociological vision. American Sociologist, 19(1), 54–70.
Hawkes, G. (2004). Sex and pleasure in western culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.
Irvine, J. (2002). Talk about sex: The battles over sex education in the United States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Kehily, M. (2002). Sexuality, gender, and schooling: Shifting agendas in social learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Kleinman, A. (2012). Intra-actions. Mousse, 34, 76–81.
Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2016). Reconceptualising qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. London: Sage.
MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.
MacLure, M. (2017). Qualitative methodology and the new materialisms. In N. Denzin & M. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in neoliberal times (pp. 48–58). New York: Routledge.
Measor, L., Tiffin, C., & Miller, K. (2000). Young people’s views on sex education: Education, attitudes and behaviour. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Ministry of Education. (2016). Deciles information. Retrieved August 1, from http://www.education.govt.nz/school/running-a-school/resourcing/operationalfunding/school-decile-ratings/
Paechter, C. (2004). Mens Sana in Corpore Sano: Cartesian dualism and the marginalisation of sex education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 25(3), 309–320.
Pierre, E., Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. (2016). New empiricisms and new materialisms: Conditions for new inquiry. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 99–110.
Rasmussen, M. (2016). Progressive sexuality education: The conceits of secularism. New York: Routledge.
Rasmussen, M., & Allen, L. (2014). What a concept can do? Rethinking education’s queer assemblages. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(3), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.888846
Rasmussen, M., Sanjakdar, F., Aspin, C., Allen, L., & Quinlivan, K. (2011). Sexuality education in Australia and New Zealand: Responding to religious and cultural difference. Australian Research Council Discovery Grant.
Springgay, S., & Truman, S. (2017). On the need for methods beyond proceduralism: Speculative middles, (In) tensions, and response-ability in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704464
St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative inquiry (pp. 611–635). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
St. Pierre, E. A. (2016). The empirical and the new empiricisms. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 111–124.
Taylor, C. (2016). Edu-crafting a cacophonous ecology: Posthumanist research practices for Education. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 5–24). Houndmills: Palgrave.
Todd, S. (2011). Standing at the crossroads of the ethical and the political: Education, Feminism and Narrativity. Paper presented at the Presentation at EDGE Symposium, 8th February, Stockholm University.
Williams, M. (2012). Aspects of ethics on four plays by Helene Cixous. Masters of Arts, University of Nottingham.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allen, L. (2018). Sexuality Education Matters. In: Sexuality Education and New Materialism. Queer Studies and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95300-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95300-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95299-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95300-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)