Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter introduces the five most prominent approaches to multimodal data analysis: Multimodal (Inter)action Analysis, Mediated Discourse Analysis, Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis, Social Semiotics, and Multimodal Conversation Analysis. The chapter begins by discussing the origin of each approach, methods of data collection and analysis, and embedded theoretical foundations. The theoretical differences between the approaches are then examined with a focus on the way each approach treats the individual, the artefact, and the notion of mode during analysis. With the variety of available approaches to multimodal data analysis, it is important that researchers link data collection and analysis to coherent theoretical underpinnings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al Zidjaly, N. (2009). Agency as an interactive achievement. Language In Society, 38(2), 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis: A multimedia toolkit and associated on-line coursebook. London and Oakville: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernad-Mechó, E. (2017). Metadiscourse and topic introductions in an academic lecture: A multimodal insight. Multimodal Communication, 6(1), 659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deppermann, A. (2013). Multimodal interaction from a conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Saint-Georges, I. (2014). Mediated discourse analysis, “embodied learning” and emerging social and professional identities. In C. Maier & S. Norris (Eds.), Interactions, images and texts (Vol. 11, 1st ed., pp. 347–356). Boston, MA: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). London: A&C Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geenen, J. (2017). Show and (sometimes) tell: Identity construction and the affordances of video-conferencing. Multimodal Communication, 6(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith Pub Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). New York: Irvington Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haddington, P., Mondada, L., & Nevile, M. (2013). Being mobile: Interaction on the move. In P. Haddington, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Interaction and mobility, language and the body in motion. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, H. E. (1994). Conversations with an Alzheimer’s Patient: An interactional sociolinguistic study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C. (2016). The visual basis of linguistic meaning and its implications for critical discourse studies: Integrating cognitive linguistic and multimodal methods. Discourse & Society, 27, 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C. (2013). Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies. In The SAGE handbook of digital technology research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (1999). Multimodality. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Colour as a semiotic mode: Notes for a grammar of colour. Visual Communication, 1(3), 343–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). The semiotic landscape. In P. Griffiths, A. J. Merrison, & A. Bloomer (Eds.), Language in use—A reader (pp. 344–350). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matelau, T. (2014). Vertical identity production and Maori identity. In S. Norris & C. Maier (Eds.), Interactions, texts and images: A reader in multimodality (Vol. 1, 1st ed., pp. 255–266). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2006). Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: Projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2009). Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(10), 1977–1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2013). The conversation analytic approach to data collection. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. (2011). Identity in interaction: Introducing multimodal interaction analysis. London: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. (2013). What is a mode? Smell, olfactory perception, and the notion of mode in multimodal mediated theory. Multimodal Communication, 2(2), 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. (2014). Learning tacit classroom participation. WCTLA. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. (forthcoming). Systematically working with multimodal data: Research methods in multimodal discourse analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S., & Pirini, J. P. (2017). Communicating knowledge, getting attention, and negotiating disagreement via videoconferencing technology: A multimodal analysis. Journal of Organizational Knowledge Communication, 3(1), 23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. (2006). Multiparty interaction: A multimodal perspective on relevance. Discourse Studies, 8(3), 401–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’ Toole, M. (2004). Opera Ludentes: The Sydney opera house at work and play. In K. O’Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives (pp. 11–27). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran, K. (1998). Classroom discourse in mathematics: A multisemiotic analysis. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 359–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran, K. (2004). Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran, K. (2008). Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA): Constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery. Visual Communication, 7(4), 443–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran, K., Marissa, K. L. E., & Tan, S. (2014). Multimodal analytics: Software and visualization techniques for analyzing and interpreting multimodal data. In The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 386–396). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Wignell, P., Bateman, J. A., Pham, D.-S., Grossman, M., & Moere, A. V. (2016). Interpreting text and image relations in violent extremist discourse: A mixed methods approach for big data analytics. Terrorism and Political Violence, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietikäinen, S., Lane, P., Salo, H., & Laihiala-Kankainen, S. (2011). Frozen actions in the arctic linguistic landscape: A nexus analysis of language processes in visual space. International Journal of Multilingualism, 8(4), 277–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirini, J. (2014a). Introduction to multimodal (inter)action analysis. In S. Norris & C. Maier (Eds.), Interactions, texts and images: A reader in multimodality (Vol. 1, 1st ed., pp. 77–92). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirini, J. (2014b). Producing shared attention/awareness in high school tutoring. Multimodal Communication, 3(2), 163–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirini, J. (2016). Intersubjectivity and materiality: A multimodal perspective. Multimodal Communication, 5(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirini, J. (2017). Agency and Co-production: A multimodal perspective. Multimodal Communication, 6(2), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirini, J., Norris, S., Geenen, J., & Matelau, T. (2014). Studying social actors: Some thoughts on ethics. In S. Norris & C. Maier (Eds.), Interactions, texts and images: A reader in multimodality (Vol. 1, 1st ed., pp. 233–243). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1967). The search for help: No one to turn to. In E. Schneidman (Ed.), Essays in self-destruction. New York: Science House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Home position. Gesture, 2(2), 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1967). The first five seconds: The order of conversational openings. Berkeley: Department of Sociology, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R. (1998). Mediated discourse as social interaction: A study of news discourse. London and New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. B. K. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. B. K. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sidnell, J. (2012). Basic conversation analytic methods. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 77–100). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1984). Coherence in spoken and written discourse. Norwood: ABLEX Pub. Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapio, E. (2014). The Marginalisation of finely tuned semiotic practices and misunderstandings in relation to (signed) languages and deafness. Multimodal Communication, 3(2), 245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemel, A., & Koschmann, T. (2014). “Put your fingers right in here”: Learnability and instructed experience. Discourse Studies, 16(2), 163–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesse Pirini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pirini, J., Matelau-Doherty, T., Norris, S. (2018). Multimodal Analysis. In: Phakiti, A., De Costa, P., Plonsky, L., Starfield, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_28

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59899-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59900-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics