Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction: The European Neutral States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The European Neutrals and NATO

Part of the book series: New Security Challenges ((NSECH))

Abstract

This chapter introduces the position of Austria, Finland, Ireland, Sweden and Switzerland as neutral states in European international politics. The chapter examines which European states may be viewed as neutral, noting that Austria, Finland, Ireland, Sweden and Switzerland (along with Yugoslavia) emerged as a distinct group of states outside NATO and the Warsaw Pact during the Cold War. The five states’ status as long-established European democracies but outside NATO now marks them out as unusual in the larger context of European international politics. The chapter also reviews existing academic literature on neutrality and the European neutral states, noting that while quite a lot has been written on the changing character of neutrality and on the impact of European Union membership on Austria, Finland, Ireland and Sweden’s foreign and security policies, the European neutral states’ post-Cold War partnerships with NATO have received less attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This section reviews English language academic literature on neutrality and the European neutral states. There are also additional works in German, Finnish and Swedish on Austria, Switzerland, Finland and Sweden, as well as on neutrality more generally.

References

  • Abbenhuis, M. M. (2013). A Most Useful Tool for Diplomacy and Statecraft: Neutrality and Europe in the “Long” Nineteenth Century, 1815–1914. The International History Review, 35(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbenhuis, M. M. (2014). An Age of Neutrals: Great Power Politics, 1815–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Agius, C. (2006). The Social Construction of Swedish Neutrality: Challenges to Swedish Identity and Sovereignty. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agius, C. (2011). Transformed Beyond Recognition: The Politics of Post-Neutrality. Cooperation and Conflict, 46(3), 370–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agius, C., & Devine, K. (Eds.). (2011). Special Issue on Neutrality and ‘Military Non-Alignment’: Exploring Norms, Discourses and Practices. Cooperation and Conflict, 46(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alden, C., & Aran, A. (2012). Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alecu de Flers, N. (2011). EU Foreign Policy and the Europeanization of Neutral States: Comparing Irish and Austrian Foreign Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anceschi, L. (2009). Turkmenistan’s Foreign Policy: Positive Neutrality and the Consolidation of the Turkmen Regime. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arter, D. (1996). Finland: From Neutrality to NATO? European Security, 5(4), 614–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailes, A. J. K., Herolf, G., & Sundelius, B. (Eds.). (2006). The Nordic Countries and the European Security and Defence Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauslaugh, R. A. (1991). The Concept of Neutrality in Classical Greece. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D. (2012). Analyzing Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bissell, R. E., & Gasteyger, K. (Eds.). (1990). The Missing Link: West European Neutrals and Regional Security. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorkdahl, A. (2007). Constructing a Swedish Conflict Prevention Policy Based on a Powerful Idea and Successful Practices. Cooperation and Conflict, 42(2), 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breuning, M. (2007). Foreign Policy Analysis: A Comparative Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, D. C. (1916). Rights and Duties of Neutrals: A Discussion of Principles and Practices. New York/London: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, C. (2008). Constructivism, Narrative and Foreign Policy Analysis: A Case Study of Finland. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, E. (2002). Traditional Neutrality Revisited: Law, Theory and Case Studies. Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottey, A. (2013). The European Neutrals and NATO: Ambiguous Partnership. Contemporary Security Policy, 34(3), 446–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, A.-S. (1997). Not if but How: Sweden’s Future Relations with NATO. NATO Review, 45(3), 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, A.-S. (2001). Sweden, the UN and NATO: Experiences from Former Yugoslavia. In G. Schmidt (Ed.), A History of NATO: The First Fifty Years (Vol. 1, pp. 105–119). Houndmills: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalsjo, R. (2006). Life-Line Lost: The Rise and Fall of ‘Neutral’ Sweden’s Secret Reserve Option of Wartime Help from the West. Stockholm: Santerus Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, K. (2011). Neutrality and the Development of the European Union’s Common Security and Defence Policy: Compatible or Competing? Cooperation and Conflict, 46(3), 334–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfer, I. (1997). The Nordic Nations in the New Western Security Regime. Washington, DC/Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center Press/Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, M. W. (1997). Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism and Socialism. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (Eds.). (2016). International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrekt, K. (2002). Security Policy Reorientation in Peripheral Europe: A Comparative Approach. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 391–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, T. (2009). Neutral Power in the CSCE: The N+N States and the Making of the Helsinki Accords 1975. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira-Pereira, L. C. (2007). Inside the Fence but Outside the Walls: The Military Non-Allied States and the Security Architecture of Post-Cold War Europe. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetschel, L. (1999). Neutrality: A Really Dead Concept? Cooperation and Conflict, 34(2), 115–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gstohl, S. (2002). Reluctant Europeans: Norway, Sweden and Switzerland in the Process of Integration. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakovirta, H. (1988). East-West Conflict and European Neutrality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanf, K., & Soetendorp, B. (Eds.). (1998). Adapting to European Integration: Small States and the European Union. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harden, S. (Ed.). (1994). Neutral States and the European Community. London: Brassey’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingebritsen, C. (2002). Norm Entrepreneurs: Scandinavia’s Role in World Politics. Cooperation and Conflict, 27(1), 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingebritsen, C. (2006). Small States in International Relations. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishizuka, K. (1999). Ireland and the Partnership for Peace. Irish Studies in International Affairs, 10, 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessup, P. C., Deák, F., Phillips, W. A., Reede, A. H., & Turlington, E. W. (1935–36). Neutrality: Its History, Economics and Law (4 vols). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokela, J. (2011). Europeanization and Foreign Policy: State Identity in Finland and Britain. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jopp, M., & Ojanen, H. (Eds.). (1999). European Security Integration: Implications for Non-Alignment and Alliances. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsh, E. (1988). Neutrality and Small States. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (Ed.). (1996). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. Columbia: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen, J. E., Miller, A., & Rowe, L. (Eds.). (2011). Other Combatants, Other Fronts: Competing Histories of the First World War. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruzel, J., & Haltzel, M. H. (Eds.). (1989). Between the Blocs: Problems and Prospects for Europe’s Neutral and Nonaligned State. Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauterpacht, H. (2004). International Law: Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht. Vol. 5, Disputes, War and Neutrality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitz, C. (2000). Nazi Germany and Neutral Europe During the Second World War. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonhard, A. T. (1988). Neutrality: Changing Concepts and Practices. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettevall, R., Somsen, G., & Widmalm, S. (Eds.). (2012). Neutrality in Twentieth-Century Europe: Intersections of Science, Culture, and Politics After the First World War. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loden, H. (2012). Reaching a Vanishing Point? Reflections on the Future of Neutrality Norms in Sweden and Finland. Cooperation and Conflict, 47(2), 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • af Malmborg, M. (2001). Neutrality and State-Building in Sweden. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, L. G. (2011). Finland, Sweden and NATO: From ‘Virtual’ to Formal Allies?, Strategic Forum. Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University. Available: http://www.ndu.edu/press/lib/pdf/StrForum/SF-265.pdf (2 August 2012).

  • Miles, L. (2005). Fusing with Europe: Sweden in the European Union. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO. (2010, November 19). Active Engagement, Modern Defence: Strategic Concept for the Defence and Security of the Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation Adopted by Heads of State and Government in Lisbon. Available: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_68580.htm (18 December 2016).

  • Neff, S. C. (2000). The Rights and Duties of Neutrals: A General History. New York: Juris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhold, H., & Thalberg, H. (Eds.). (1984). The European Neutrals in International Affairs. Vienna: Braumüller for the Austrian Institute for International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojanen, H. (Ed.). (2003). Neutrality and Non-Alignment in Europe Today (FIIA Report 6/2003). Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, J. M. (1992). Neither Friend Nor Foe: The European Neutrals in World War II. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacosma, V. S., & Rubin, M. R. (1989). Europe’s Neutral and Nonaligned States: Between NATO and the Warsaw Pact. Wilmington: Scholarly Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersson, M. (2011). NATO and the EU “Neutrals”—Instrumental or Value-Oriented Utility? In H. Edström, J. H. Matlary, & M. Petersson (Eds.), NATO: The Power of Partnerships (pp. 112–130). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pursiainen, C., & Saari, S. (2002). Et tu Brute! Finland’s NATO Option and Russia (UPI Report). Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, G. A. (1997). Neutrality Norms and the Balance of Power. Cooperation and Conflict, 32(2), 123–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reginbogin, H. R. (2009). Faces of Neutrality: A Comparative Analysis of the Neutrality of Switzerland and Other Neutral Nations During WW II. Berlin: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickli, J.-M. (2004). The Western Influence on Swedish and Swiss Policies of Armed Neutrality During the Early Cold War. In R. Schwok & V. Curzon-Price (Eds.), Europe: Interaction Globales—Global Interactions (pp. 117–134). Geneva: InstitutEuropeen de l’Universite de Geneve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieker, P. (2002). From Territorial Defence to Comprehensive Security? European Integration and the Changing Norwegian and Swedish Security Identities (NUPI Paper 626). Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russett, B., & Oneal, J. R. (2000). Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromvik, M. (2006). Starting to “Think Big”: The Nordic Countries and EU Peace-Building. In A. J. K. Bailes, G. Herolf, & B. Sundelius (Eds.), The Nordic Countries and the European Security and Defence Policy (pp. 199–214). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundelius, B. (Ed.). (1987). The Neutral Democracies and the New Cold War. Boulder/London: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonra, B. (2012). European Republic to Global Citizen: Irish Foreign Policy in Transition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vaahtoranta, T., & Forsberg, T. (2000). Post-Neutral or Pre-Allied? Finnish and Swedish Policies on the EU and NATO as Security Organisations (UPI Working Papers 29). Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vayrynen, T. (2006). “The Higher Cause of Peace”: What Could and Should the Nordic Countries Contribute to the Development of Conflict Mediation in the EU Context? In A. J. K. Bailes, G. Herolf, & B. Sundelius (Eds.), The Nordic Countries and the European Security and Defence Policy (pp. 215–233). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viotti, P. R., & Kauppi, M. V. (2010). International Relations Theory. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt, S. M. (1990). The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagnsson, C. (2011). A Security Community in the Making? Sweden and NATO Post-Libya. European Security, 20(4), 585–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, R. (2011). The Europeanization of Foreign Policy. In C. Hill & M. Smith (Eds.), International Relations and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, N. (Ed.). (2002). European Neutrals and Non-Belligerents During the Second World War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

    Andrew Cottey

Authors
  1. Andrew Cottey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Government, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

    Andrew Cottey

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cottey, A. (2018). Introduction: The European Neutral States. In: Cottey, A. (eds) The European Neutrals and NATO. New Security Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59524-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation