Skip to main content

The New Nationalism and its Relationship to Islam

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diversity and Contestations over Nationalism in Europe and Canada

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology ((PSEPS))

Abstract

This chapter analyses how the “new nationalism” in Norway contributes to set or alter national and nationalist boundaries through actively “othering” Muslims, who have come to feature as threats to a whole range of issues including the sustainability of the Norwegian welfare state, gender equality, LGBT rights, liberalism and secularism and freedom of expression. The chapter draws on Ruth Wodak’s notion of “politics of fear” and seeks to show how this manifests itself in the discourse of the Norwegian Progress Party, a junior government partner since October 2013. This type of rhetoric on Islam and Muslims is not distinctive to Norway but figures centrally in the manner in which, for instance, the Danish People’s Party also pursues a politics of exclusion through fearmongering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    By Islamophobia, I mean to refer to what Mattias Gardell has defined as “socially reproduced practices and aversions against Islam and Muslims which attack, exclude and discriminate against Muslims upon the basis that they are, or are assumed by others to be, Muslims, and associated with Islam” (Gardell 2011: 17, my translation). The first recorded academic usage of the term has been traced back to two French West Africanists, Maurice Delafosse and Alain Quillien, in 1910. The first academic usage in English is found in Edward Said’s article “Orientalism Reconsidered”, first published in 1985. The term was popularised and entered into common usage through the UK Runnymede Trust Report on Islamophobia: “A Challenge for us All” in 1997 (López 2011).

  2. 2.

    The, to date, most extensive study of this is Fangen and Vaage (2014). See, also, Bangstad (2016a) for an updated study of Progress Party anti-Muslim rhetoric since 2011.

  3. 3.

    A survey from 2005/06 found that Norwegian-Somalis reported more discrimination with regard to employment and housing than any other group of non-Western immigrants to Norway (Tronstad 2008). A survey from 2012 demonstrated that applicants with Norwegian-Pakistani sounding surnames were 25 per cent less likely to get called in for employment interviews by Norwegian employers when their qualifications and employment were the same as that of “ethnic” Norwegian applicants (Midtbøen and Rogstad 2012). A report from the Oslo Police on hate crimes reported to the police in the Oslo Police District, which has Norway’s only Hate Crimes Unit to date, found that, out of 40 reported hate crimes in 2015 where a victim’s real or ascribed “religion” was the reported bias motive, 35 of the hate crimes involved Muslims as victims (Oslopolitiet 2016).

  4. 4.

    The Rushdie affair refers to the global crisis unleashed by the publication of the Indian-born novelist Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses in 1988. Islamists in Britain and elsewhere rushed to declare the novel “blasphemous” and to demand its banning in numerous countries. In February 1989, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the Islamist regime in Iran, issued a fatwa against Salman Rushdie and called for his assassination. Rushdie was forced to go into hiding for many years; the novel’s Japanese and Italian translators were assassinated; and Rushdie’s Norwegian publisher William Nygaard, the first in the world to bring out a translation of the novel and central to the international campaign in support of Rushdie , narrowly survived an assassination attempt in 1994. A good early overview of the Rushdie affair is provided by Ruthven (1990), whereas Rushdie’s own account is provided in Rushdie (2012).

  5. 5.

    A survey commissioned by researchers at the University of Oslo under the CoMRel Research Group funded by the Norwegian Research Council (NRC)’s SAMKUL Programme and conducted by TNS Gallup in 2015 found close to 50 per cent of respondents agreeing that Islam “in part” or “fully” represents a threat to Norwegian culture. Professor Knut Lundby, personal correspondence, 25 June 2015.

  6. 6.

    A copy of the letter that Hagen alleged to have received is available at http://www.dagbladet.no/2013/05/25/nyheter/politikk/frp/siv_jensen/carl_i_hagen/27336391.

  7. 7.

    Verdens Gang (VG) is Norway’s second biggest print newspaper in terms of circulation and the most widely read newspaper among Progress Party voters.

  8. 8.

    Document.no is a Norwegian online magazine, which proclaims itself to be Christian conservative and critical of Islam.

  9. 9.

    In a cabinet reshuffle in December 2015, MP Sandberg was designated as the new Minister of Fisheries. As a function of Sandberg being allocated to this post, he hardly makes any public statements on immigration, Muslims and Islam anymore, but limits himself to verbal attacks on Norwegian academic marine biologists who do not adhere to the strictures of the billion dollar marine aquaculture industry in Norway.

  10. 10.

    Tajik is a former Minister of Culture for the Labour Party 2012–2013, the first ever cabinet minister of Muslim background in Norway and the current chair of the Parliamentary Committee on Justice. She is the second child of a Pakistani-Afghan migrant labour migrating couple who arrived in Norway in the 1970s, and is known for her vocal opposition to Salafi-jihadism. For more on Tajik, see Bangstad (2015).

  11. 11.

    See http://www.dagbladet.no/2014/08/23/nyheter/politikk/innenriks/samfunn/ulf_leirstein/34934708 for this. Hadia Tajik describes herself as a Muslim, albeit not a “Muslim politician”.

References

  • Aftenposten. (2010). Drøm fra Disneyland [Dream from Disneyland]. Op-ed., August 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London and New York: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bail, C. A. (2008). The Configuration of Symbolic Boundaries Against Immigrants in Europe. American Sociological Review, 73(1), 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bail, C. A. (2015). Terrified: How Anti-Muslim Fringe Organizations Became Mainstream. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bangstad, S. (2011). The Morality Police Are Coming! Muslims in Norway’s Media Discourses. Anthropology Today, 27(5), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangstad, S. (2013a). Eurabia Comes to Norway. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 24(3), 369–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangstad, S. (2013b). Inclusion and Exclusion in the Mediated Public Sphere: The Case of Norway and Its Muslims. Social Anthropology, 21(3), 356–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangstad, S. (2014). Anders Breivik and the Rise of Islamophobia. London and New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangstad, S. (2015). The Politics of Mediated Presence: Exploring the Voices of Muslims in Mediated Public Spheres in Contemporary Norway. Oslo: Scandinavian Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangstad, S. (2016a). Norwegian Right-Wing Discourses: Extremism Post-Utøya. In D. Pratt & R. Woodlock (Eds.), Fear of Muslims? Berlin and New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangstad, S. (2016b). Recoding Nationalism: Islam, Muslims and Islamophobia in Norway Before and After July 22 2011. In F. Hafez (Ed.), Islamophobia Studies Yearbook (Vol. 7, pp. 44–65). Vienna: New Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangstad, S. (2016c). Islamophobia: What’s in a Name? Analysing the Discourses of StoppIslamiseringenav Norge (Stop the Islamisation of Norway, SIAN). Journal of Muslims in Europe, 5(2), 145–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangstad, S., & Bunzl, M. (2010). Anthropologists Are Talking About Islamophobia and Anti-Semitism in the New Europe. Ethnos, 75(2), 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangstad, S., & Elgvin, O. (2015). Norway. In O. Scharbrodt et al. (Eds.), Yearbook of Muslims in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 436–449). Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, H.-G., & Meret, S. (2009). Revisiting Lepanto: The Political Mobilization Against Islam in Contemporary Europe. Patterns of Prejudice, 43(3–4), 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brettschneider, C. (2012). When the State Speaks, What Should It Say? How Democracies Can Protect Expression and Promote Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brochmann, G., & Hagelund, A. (Eds.). (2012). Immigration Policy and the Scandinavian Welfare State 1945–2010. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2006). Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagens Perspektiv. (2010, December 5). Mest redd for konflikt med muslimer. [Most Concerned About Conflict with Muslims], Dagens Perspektiv. Retrieved June 26, 2015, from http://www.dagensperspektiv.no/mest-redd-konflikt-med-muslimer

  • Dagsavisen. (2011, February 1). Likestiller islam og nazisme [Analogies Islam and Nazism]. Dagsavisen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Døving, C. A. (2012). Norge snikislamiseres. In S. Indregard (Ed.), Motgift: Akademisk respons på den nye høyreekstremismen (pp. 87–97). Oslo: Flamme Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, T. H. (2002). Ethnicity and Nationalism: Anthropological Perspectives (2nd ed.). London and New York: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fangen, K., & Vaage, M. (2014). Frp-politikeres innvandringsretorikk i posisjon og opposisjon. Agora: Journal for Metafysisk Spekulasjon, 3(4), 30–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fekete, L. (2009). A Suitable Enemy: Racism, Migration and Islamophobia in Europe. London and New York: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firdaposten. (2013, December 12). Per Sandbergs bok: Fri diktning om Svelgen [Per Sandberg’s Book: Free Association About Svelgen]. Firdaposten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardell, M. (2011). Islamofobi. Translated from Swedish to Norwegian by Alexander Leborg. Oslo: Spartacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. T. (2006). Racial Europeanization. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 29(2), 331–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullestad, M. (2006). Plausible Prejudice: Everyday Experiences and Social Images of Nation, Culture and Race. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafez, F. (2014). Shifting Borders: Islamophobia as Common Ground for Building Pan-European Right-Wing Unity. Patterns of Prejudice, 48(5), 479–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helland, F. (2014). Rasisme uten rasister i Norge. Agora: Tidsskrift For Metafysisk Spekulasjon, 14(3–4), 108–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • HL-Center. (2012). Antisemitism in Norway? The Attitudes of the Norwegian Population Towards Jews and Other Minorities. Oslo: HL-Center. Retrieved June 26, 2015, from http://www.hlsenteret.no/publikasjoner/antisemitism-in-norway-web.pdf

  • Hobsbawn, E., & Ranger, T. (Eds.). (1983). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMDI. (2010). [The Directorate of Integration and Diversity]. Integreringsbarometeret 2010. Oslo: IMDI. Retrieved June 26, 2015, from http://www.imdi.no/Documents/Rapporter/Integreringsbarometeret_2010.pdf

  • IMDI. (2014). [The Directorate of Integration and Diversity]. Integreringsbarometeret 2013–14 [The Integration Barometer 2013–2014]. Oslo: IMDI. Retrieved June 26, 2015, from http://www.imdi.no/Documents/Rapporter/2014/Integreringsbarometeret_2013-2014.pdf

  • Jupskås, A. R. (2009). Høyrepopulismepånorsk.Historienom Anders Langes Partiog Fremskrittspartiet [Right-Wing Populism in Norwegian. The Story of Anders Lange’s Party and the Progress Party]. In T. E. Simonsen et al. (Eds.), Høyrepopulismei Europa (Right-Wing Populism in Europe) (pp. 27–79). Oslo: Unipub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupskås, A. R. (2015). The Persistence of Populism: The Norwegian Progress Party 1973–2009. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klug, B. (2014). The Limits of Analogy: Comparing Islamophobia and Antisemitism. Patterns of Prejudice, 48(5), 442–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundnani, A. (2014). The Muslims Are Coming! Islamophobia, Extremism and the War on Terror. London and New York: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laegaard, S. (2007). Liberal Nationalism and the Nationalisation of Liberal Values. Nations and Nationalism, 13(1), 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. M. (2008). The Political Mind: Why You Can’t Understand 21st Century American Politics with an 18th Century Brain. New York: Viking Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, G. (2012). The Fear of Small Numbers: Eurabia Literature and Censuses on National Belonging. Journal of Muslims in Europe, 1, 142–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lean, N. (2012). The Islamophobia Industry: How the Far-Right Manufactures Fear of Muslims. London and New York: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, F. B. (2011). Towards a Definition of Islamophobia: Approximations of the Early Twentieth Century. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(4), 556–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. (2014). Islam Through Western Eyes: From the Crusades to the War on Terrorism. New York and London: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (2004). Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the Roots of Terror. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massad, J. (2015). Islam in Liberalism. New York and London: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meret, S., & Siim, B. (2016). Right-Wing Populism in Denmark: People, Nation and Welfare in the Construction of the ‘Other’. In G. Lazaridis, G. Campani, & A. Benveniste (Eds.), The Rise of the Far Right in Europe: Populist Shifts and ‘Othering’ (pp. 109–136). London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midtbøen, A. H., & Rogstad, J. (2012). Diskrimineringens omfang og årsaker: Etniske minoriteters tilgang til norsk arbeidsliv. Report 1: 2012. Oslo: Institutt for Samfunnsforskning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, P., & Yaqin, A. (2011). Framing Muslims: Stereotyping and Representation After 9/11. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oslopolitiet. (2016). Anmeldt hatkriminalitet—Oslo politidistrikt 2015. Oslo: Oslopolitiet. Retrieved from https://www.politi.no/vedlegg/lokale_vedlegg/oslo/Vedlegg_3571.pdf

  • Østby, L. (2008). Levekårsundersøkelse blant innvandrere—hvordan og hvorfor. In S. Blom & K. Henriksen (Eds.), Levekår blant innvandrere i Norge 2005/2006 (pp. 15–26). Oslo: Statistisk Sentralbyrå.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelinka, A. (2013). Right-Wing Populism: Concept and Typology. In R. Wodak, M. KhosraviNik, & B. Mral (Eds.), Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse (pp. 3–23). London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilbeam, B. (2011). Eurabian Nightmares: American Conservative Discourses and the Islamisation of Europe. Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 9(2), 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranger, T. (1993). The Invention of Tradition Revisited: The Case of Colonial Africa. In T. Ranger & O. Vaughan (Eds.), Legitimacy and the State in Twentieth-Century Africa: Essays in Honour of A.H.M. Kirk-Greene (pp. 62–111). London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Razack, S. (2008). Casting Out: The Eviction of Muslims from Western Law and Politics. Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, P. (2012). The Society of Equals (Arthur Goldhammer, Trans.). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushdie, S. (2012). Joseph Anton: A Memoir. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, M. (1990). A Satanic Affair. London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, P. (2013). Mot min vilje. Oslo: Juritzen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandvik, S., & Liestøl, A-K. (2011). En av fire nordmenn ser på islam som en trussel. [One Out of four Norwegians Regard Islam as a Threat], Nrk.no 27.10.2011. Retrieved June 26, 2015, from http://www.nrk.no/norge/ser-pa-islam-som-en-trussel-1.7847186

  • Scott, J. W. (2007). The Politics of the Veil. Oppklaring av et politisk liv. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, R. (2008). Stealth Jihad: How Radical Islam Is Subverting America Without Guns or Bombs. Washington, DC: Regency Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strømmen, Ø. (2011). Detmørkenettet. Om høyreekstremisme, kontrajihadismeog terror i Europa. Oslo: CappelenDamm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. (2009). Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. (2014). Conspiracy Theories and Other Dangerous Ideas. London and New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suszycki, A. M. (Ed.). (2011). Welfare Citizenship and Welfare Nationalism. Helsinki: NordWel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2004). Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian. (2011). Anders Breivik’s Spider Web of Hate. September 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronstad, K. (2008). Diskriminering. In S. Blom & K. Henriksen (Eds.), Levekårblantinnvandrerei Norge 2005/06. Oslo: StatistiskSentralbyrå.

    Google Scholar 

  • VG. (2010). Frp-politiker: Islam er en samfunnsfiendtlig ideologi [Progress Party Politician: Islam is an Ideology Hostile to Society]. VG, February 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2015). The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & KhosraviNik, M. (2013). Dynamics of Discourse and Politics in Right-Wing Populism in Europe and Beyond: An Introduction. In R. Wodak & M. KhosraviNik (Eds.), Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse (pp. xvii–xxviii). London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, F. (2016). How the Workers Became Muslims: Immigration, Culture and Hegemonic Transformation in Europe. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zúquete, J. P. (2008). The European Extreme Right and Islam: New Directions? Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(3), 321–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bangstad, S. (2018). The New Nationalism and its Relationship to Islam. In: Fossum, J., Kastoryano, R., Siim, B. (eds) Diversity and Contestations over Nationalism in Europe and Canada. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58987-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58987-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58986-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58987-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics