Skip to main content

Entrapping Asylum Seekers: Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrapping Asylum Seekers

Part of the book series: Transnational Crime, Crime Control and Security ((TCCCS))

Abstract

Asylum seekers are immediately recognizable as a population that faces increasing levels of legal, social and economic precariousness, inherited from their home countries and exacerbated by widespread hostility in host or destination countries that feel anxious, if not outright threatened, by the risk asylum seekers are perceived to pose. This book conceptualizes the precarity endured by asylum seekers as entrapment, and seeks to identify the agents and processes that contribute to this cycle and produce the lived experience of immiseration that has been brought to bear on asylum seekers. This chapter introduces the conceptual framework that forms the genesis of this book evaluating the entrapment of asylum seekers. The case is made for a strident analysis of agency so that asylum seekers are not represented as passive victims. And yet this chapter reveals how asylum seeker responses to their environment may further their precarity and criminalization, reinforcing the policies, practices and discourses of the securitization of migration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aas, K. F. (2011). “Crimmigrant” bodies and bona fide travelers: Surveillance, citizenship and global governance. Theoretical Criminology, 15(3), 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aas, K. F., & Bosworth, M. (Eds.). (2013). The borders of punishment: Migration, citizenship, and social exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, G. (1995). Homo sacer: Il potere sovrano e la nuda vita [The sovereign power and bare life]. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agier, M. (2011). Managing the undesirable: Refugee camps and humanitarian government. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B., & Ruhs, M. (2010). Researching illegality and labour migration. Population, Space and Place, 16(3), 175–179. doi:10.1002/psp.594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalisation: The human consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, R. (1993). Refugees and asylum seekers in Western Europe: New challenges. In R. Back & V. Robinson (Eds.), Geography and refugees: Patterns and processes of change. London/New York: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, A., & Chimienti, M. (2011). Irregular migration in a globalising world. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 78, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M., & Guild, M. (2008). Governing through migration control. British Journal of Criminology, 48(6), 703–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The power of mourning and violence. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S. (2003). Towards a sociology of forced migration and social transformation. Sociology, 37(1), 13–34. doi:10.1177/0038038503037001384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, W. (2011). Police and law enforcement. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (2006). Migration and its enemies: Global capital, migrant labour and the nation-state. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutin, B. (2010). Confined within: National territories as zones of confinement. Political Geography, 29, 200–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, J. (2007). Vital distinction. Refugees, 148, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauvergne, C. (2008). Making people illegal: What globalisation means for migration and law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Genova, N. P. (2002). Migrant “illegality” and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 419–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. (1999). Predatory globalization: A critique. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, G. P. (1994). Can liberal states control unwanted migration? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 534(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, A. (2014). The securitisation of migration and refugee women. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibney, M. J. (2004). The ethics and politics of asylum: Liberal democracy and the response to refugees. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gibney, M. J., & Hansen, R. (2005). Asylum policy in the west: Past trends, future possibilities. In G. J. Borjas & J. Crisp (Eds.), Poverty, international migration and asylum (pp. 70–96). Houndmills/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1981). A contemporary critique of historical materialism, vol. 1: Power, property and the state. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin-Gill, G., & McAdam, J. (2007). The refugee in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarnizo, L. E. (2012). The fluid, multi-scalar, and contradictory construction of citizenship. In M. P. Smith & M. McQuarrie (Eds.), Remaking urban citizenship: Organizations, institutions, and the right to the city (pp. 11–35). London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guild, E. (2009). Security and migration in the 21st century. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, E. (2008). The refugee in international society: Between sovereigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammar, T. (2001). Politics of immigration control and politicisation of international migration. In M. A. B. Siddique (Ed.), International migration into the 21st century: Essays in honour of Reginald Appleyard (pp. 15–28). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell-Bond, B. (2002). Can humanitarian work with refugees be humane? Human Rights Quarterly, 24(1), 51–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, H. Ø. (2012). Nigerians in China: A second state of immobility. International Migration, 50(2), 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huot, S., Bobadilla, A., Bailliard, A., & Rudman, D. L. (2016). Constructing undesirables: A critical discourse analysis of “othering” within the Protecting Canada’s Immigration System Act. International Migration, 54(2), 131–143. doi:10.1111/imig.12210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, J. (2006). The politics of insecurity: Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, N. B. (2013). Governing the funnel of expulsion: Agamben, the dynamics of force, and minimalist biopolitics. In K. F. Aas & M. Bosworth (Eds.), The borders of punishment: Migration, citizenship, and social exclusion (pp. 257–272). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C. (1998). Why liberal states accept unwanted immigration. World Politics, 50(2), 266–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, I. (2013). Celebrity humanitarianism: The ideology of global charity. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keely, C. B. (2001). The international refugee regime(s): The end of the Cold War matters. International Migration Review, 35(1), 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khosravi, S. (2010). ‘Illegal traveller’: An auto-ethnography of borders. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koser, K. (1997). Social networks and the asylum cycle: The case of Iranians in the Netherlands. International Migration Review, 31(3), 591–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koser, K. (2006). Irregular migration. In B. Marshall (Ed.), The politics of migration: A survey. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landolt, P., & Goldring, L. (2010). The long term impacts of non-citizenship on work: Precarious legal status and the institutional production of a migrant working poor, viewed 15 August 2012. http://www.yorku.ca/raps1/events/pdf/Landolt_Goldring.pdf

  • Loescher, G. (1993). Beyond charity: International cooperation and the global refugee crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkki, L. H. (1995). Refugees and exile: From “refugee studies” to the national order of things. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 495–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, T. (2015). Australian law dictionary. Sydney: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. (2013). “Asylum shopping” in the neoliberal social imaginary. Media, Culture & Society, 35(3), 348–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mountz, A. (2010). Seeking asylum: Human smuggling and bureaucracy at the border. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muus, P. (Ed.). (1997). Exclusion and inclusion of refugees in contemporary Europe. Utrecht: ERCOMER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Núñez, G. G., & Heyman, J. M. (2007). Entrapment processes and immigrant communities in a time of heightened border vigilance. Human Organization, 66(4), 354–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, S. (2005). Refugees and state crime. Sydney: The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (1996). Losing control? Sovereignty in an age of globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schierup, C. U., Alund, A., & Likic-Brboric, B. (2016). Migration, precarization and the democratic deficit in global governance. International Migration, 53(3), 50–63. doi:10.1111/imig.12171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sciurba, A. (2009). Campi di forza: percorsi confinati di migranti in Europa [Force fields: Migrant confined paths in Europe]. Verona: Ombre Corte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, V. (2009). The exclusionary politics of asylum. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, B. N. (1986). The experience of being a refugee: Insights from the research literature. In C. Williams & J. Westermeyer (Eds.), Refugee mental health in resettlement countries (pp. 5–23). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, I. (2013). Revolting subject: Social abjection and resistance in neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNHCR. (2010). Convention and protocol relating to the status of refugees. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/3b66c2aa10.html

  • UNHCR. (2016). Global forced displacement hits record high. UNHCR News. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/en-au/news/latest/2016/6/5763b65a4/global-forced-displacement-hits-record-high.html

  • Van Hear, N. (1998). New diasporas: The mass exodus, dispersal and regrouping of migrant communities. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hear, N., & Crisp, J. (1998). Refugee protection and immigration control: Addressing the asylum dilemma. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 17(3), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Liempt, I., & Doomernick, J. (2006). Migrant’s agency in the smuggling process: The perspectives of smuggled migrants in the Netherlands. International Migration, 44(4), 165–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio, F. (2013). La promessa e la realtà dell’asilo in Asia. In I. S. M. U. Fondazione (Ed.), XIX Rapporto sulle Migrazioni 2013 (pp. 203–213). Milan: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio, F. (2015). Asylum seeking and the global city. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, F. (2012). Borderline justice: The fight for refugee and migrant rights. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, L. (2006). The shifting frontiers of migration control. In S. Pickering & L. Weber (Eds.), Borders, mobility and technologies of control (pp. 21–44). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, L. (2011). Policing non-citizens. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, L. (Ed.). (2015). Rethinking border control for a globalizing world: A preferred future. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, L., & Pickering, S. (2011). Globalization and borders: Death at the global frontier. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zetter, R. (2007). More labels, fewer refugees: Remaking the refugee label in an era of globalization. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(2), 172–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zizek, S. (2016). La nuova lotta di classe: rifugiati, terrorismo e altri problemi coi vicini [Against the double blackmail: Refugees, terror and other troubles with the neighbours]. Milano: Ponte alle Grazie.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gerard, A., Vecchio, F. (2017). Entrapping Asylum Seekers: Introduction. In: Vecchio, F., Gerard, A. (eds) Entrapping Asylum Seekers. Transnational Crime, Crime Control and Security. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58739-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58739-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58738-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58739-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics