Abstract
The recent “relational turn” in the social sciences is bringing much needed attention to the study of social relations. This chapter discusses relational sociologists’ efforts to reconnect, in more deliberate terms, with the primacy of relations and process thinking. For some theorists, all is social relations insofar as interdependent actors, transactions, and emergent patterns exist always-already in constant motion. This avidly anti-essentialist view of lived experience differs notably from the critical realist notion that relations can give rise to sui generis social effects, events, or phenomena. Notwithstanding different streams of thought on such matters, there is general agreement concerning the relational embeddedness of human activity. There is considerable theoretical value in thinking about community as a confluence of multifaceted relations and as an emergent phenomenon that possesses distinct properties.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Archer, M. S. (1982). Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action. The British Journal of Sociology, 33, 455–483. https://doi.org/10.2307/589357
Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. S. (2010a). Critical realism and relational sociology: Complementarity and synergy. Journal of Critical Realism, 9, 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcr.v9i2.199
Archer, M. S. (2010b). Routine, reflexivity, and realism. Sociological Theory, 28, 272–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01375.x
Aspers, P., & Kohl, S. (2013). Heidegger and socio-ontology: A sociological reading. Journal of Classical Sociology, 13, 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X13480647
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds. and V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1979).
Bakhtin, M. M. (1990). Art and answerability: Early philosophical essay by M. M. Bakhtin (M. Holquist & V. Liapunav, Eds. and V. Liapunov, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act (V. Liapunov & M. Holquist, Eds. and V. Liapunov, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1986).
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: The Penguin Press.
Bessant, K. C. (2014). The relational genesis of community: Self-other dialogue. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24, 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2185
Bottero, W. (2009). Relationality and social interaction. The British Journal of Sociology, 60, 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01236.x
Bourdieu, P. (1985a). The genesis of the concepts of habitus and of field. Sociocriticism, 2, 11–24.
Bourdieu, P. (1985b). The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society, 14, 723–744. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/657373
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Buber, M. (1965). The knowledge of man: A philosophy of the interhuman (M. Friedman, Ed. and M. Friedman & R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row, Publishers.
Buber, M. (2002). Between man and man (R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1947).
Burkitt, I. (2016). Relational agency: Relational sociology, agency and interaction. European Journal of Social Theory, 19, 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431015591426
Coole, D. (2005). Rethinking agency: A phenomenological approach to embodiment and agentic capacities. Political Studies, 53, 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00520.x
Crossley, N. (1996). Intersubjectivity: The fabric of social becoming. London, UK: Sage Publications, Ltd.
Crossley, N. (2011). Towards relational sociology. London, UK: Routledge.
Crossley, N. (2013). Interactions, juxtapositions, and tastes: Conceptualizing “relations” in relational sociology. In C. Powell & F. Dépelteau (Eds.), Conceptualizing relational sociology: Ontological and theoretical issues (pp. 123–143). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Crossley, N. (2015). Relational sociology and culture: A preliminary framework. International Review of Sociology, 25, 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.997965
Dépelteau, F. (2008). Relational thinking: A critique of co-deterministic theories of structure and agency. Sociological Theory, 26, 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00318.x
Dépelteau, F. (2013). What is the direction of the “relational turn”? In C. Powell & F. Dépelteau (Eds.), Conceptualizing relational sociology: Ontological and theoretical issues (pp. 163–185). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dépelteau, F. (2015). Relational sociology, pragmatism, transactions and social fields. International Review of Sociology, 25, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.997966
Donati, P. (2011). Relational sociology: A new paradigm for the social sciences. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Donati, P. (2013a). Social engagement: The viewpoint of relational sociology. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 5, 84–99. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJSA10.099
Donati, P. (2013b). The added value of social relations. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 5, 19–35. Retrieved from http://ijse.padovauniversitypress.it/2013/1/2
Donati, P. (2014). Relational sociology, critical realism and social morphogenesis. Sociologia e Politiche Sociali, 17, 9–26. https://doi.org/10.3280/SP2014-001002
Donati, P. (2015). Manifesto for a critical realist relational sociology. International Review of Sociology, 25, 86–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.997967
Donati, P., & Archer, M. S. (2015). The relational subject. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Durkheim, É. (1938). The rules of sociological method (G. E. G. Catlin, Ed. and S. A. Solovay & J. M. Mueller, Trans.). New York, NY: The Free Press. (Original work published 1895).
Elder-Vass, D. (2008). Integrating institutional, relational and embodied structure: An emergentist perspective. The British Journal of Sociology, 59, 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00194.x
Elias, N. (2001). The society of individuals (M. Schröter, Ed. and E. Jephcott, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published 1987).
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1086/231209
Erikson, E. (2013). Formalist and relationist theory in social network analysis. Sociological Theory, 31, 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275113501998
Fish, K. (2013). Relational sociology and historical materialism: Three conversation starters. In C. Powell & F. Dépelteau (Eds.), Conceptualizing relational sociology: Ontological and theoretical issues (pp. 27–44). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fushe, J. A. (2015). Theorizing social networks: The relational sociology of and around Harrison White. International Review of Sociology, 25, 15–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.997968
Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hosking, D. M., & Pluut, B. (2010). (Re)constructing reflexivity: A relational constructionist approach. The Qualitative Report, 15, 59–75. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1140&context=tqr
Kaipayil, J. (2009). Relationalism: A theory of being. Bangalore: JIP Publications.
King, A. (1999). Against structure: A critique of morphogenetic social theory. The Sociological Review, 47, 199–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00170
Liu, S., & Emirbayer, M. (2016). Field and ecology. Sociological Theory, 34, 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275116632556
Matarrita-Cascante, D., & Brennan, M. A. (2012). Conceptualizing community development in the twenty-first century. Community Development, 43, 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2011.593267
May, V. (2011). Self, belonging and social change. Sociology, 45, 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511399624
McNamee, S., & Gergen, K. J. (1999). Relational responsibility: Resources for sustainable dialgoue. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist (C. W. Morris, Ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Murphy, M. (2011). The ties that bind: Distinction, recognition and the relational. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5, 103–116. Retrieved from http://iji.cgpublisher.com/product/pub.88/prod.1294
Nancy, J.-L. (1991). The inoperative community (P. Connor, Ed. and P. Connor, L. Garbus, M. Holland, & S. Sawhney, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Nancy, J.-L. (2000). Being singular plural (R. D. Richardson & A. E. O’Byrne, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1996).
Piiroinen, T. (2014). For “central conflation”: A critique of Archerian dualism. Sociological Theory, 32, 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275114537632
Porpora, D. V. (2013). Morphogenesis and social change. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Social morphogenesis (pp. 25–37). New York, NY: Springer.
Powell, C. (2013). Radical relationism: A proposal. In C. Powell & F. Dépelteau (Eds.), Conceptualizing relational sociology: Ontological and theoretical issues (pp. 187–207). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Powell, C., & Dépelteau, F. (2013). Introduction. In C. Powell & F. Dépelteau (Eds.), Conceptualizing relational sociology: Ontological and theoretical issues (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Prandini, R. (2015). Relational sociology: A well-defined sociological paradigm or a challenging “relational turn” in sociology? International Review of Sociology, 25, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.997969
Selg, P. (2016). Two faces of the “relational turn”. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49, 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096515001195
Somers, M. R. (1998). “We’re no angels”: Realism, rational choice, and relationality in social science. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 722–784. https://doi.org/10.1086/210085
Tsekeris, C. (2010). Relationalism in sociology: Theoretical and methodological elaborations. Facta Universitatis, 9, 139–148. Retrieved from http://facta.junis.ni.ac.rs/pas/pas2010/pas2010-12.pdf
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds. and E. Fischoff et al., Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Wilkinson, K. P. (1970). The community as a social field. Social Forces, 48, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/2574650
Wilkinson, K. P. (1991). The community in rural America. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bessant, K.C. (2018). Relational Sociology and Emergent Community. In: The Relational Fabric of Community. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56042-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56042-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56041-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56042-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)