Skip to main content

Coda: Immaterial Labour and the Modernist Work of Literature

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 224 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter draws on the concept of ‘immaterial labour’ to explore two key questions: ‘What is the work of literature?’ and ‘How might literary writing best be theorized as “work”?’ The activity of literary writing has proved peculiarly resistant to many theoretical and historical framings of and approaches to labour. The chapter thus proposes that the concept of ‘immaterial labour’ offers a new theoretical and historical framing that generates significant insights into the nature of literary work. Through readings of a range of modernist works, it argues that examining them in relation to ‘immaterial labour’ can enable a fresh approach to some of the ‘difficulties’ in theorising literary writing as a form of work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This term was derived from William James, but first used to characterize distinctive aspects of modernist prose by May Sinclair in a 1918 review of a volume of Dorothy Richardson’s Pilgrimage.

  2. 2.

    Roland Barthes notes in a 1979 interview, ‘Dare to be Lazy’ that Proust’s involuntary memory ‘involves a kind of idleness’, though also observes that ‘for Proust, writing was not a lazy activity.’ See The Grain of the Voice: Interviews 1962–1980 (1985). London: Cape.

Works Cited

  • Armstrong, Tim. (2005) Modernism: A Cultural History. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Samuel. (1969) Proust and Three Dialogue with Georges Duthuit. London: Calder Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. (1979) La Distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, Joseph. (1896) ‘Letter to T. Fisher Unwin’, in The Collected Letters of Joseph Conrad, ed. F. Karl and L. Davies, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 314.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1897a) Nigger of the ‘Narcissus’. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1897b) ‘Letter to A. Krieger’, in The Collected Letters, ed. Karl and Davies, vol. 1, 363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. (2004) Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2000) Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, Aaron. (2010) ‘Publication, Patronage, Censorship: Literary Production and the Fortunes of Modernist Value’, in The Oxford Handbook of Modernisms, ed. Peter Brooker et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 315–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, William. (1890) ‘The Stream of Thought’, in The Principles of Psychology Vol. I, ed. F. Bowers et al. London: Harvard University Press, 233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kime Scott, Bonnie. (1990). The Gender of Modernism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, D. H. (1910). ‘Letter to Helen Corke’, in The Letters of D. H. Lawrence, ed. J. T. Boulton, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 161.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1911). ‘Letter to L. Burrows’, in The Letters of D. H. Lawrence, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, Maurizio. (1996) ‘Immaterial Labour’, in Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, ed. P. Virno and M. Hardt. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 133–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2014) Marcel Duchamp et le refus du travail. Paris: Les Prairies Ordinaires.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Michael. (2001) Reading 1922: A Return to the Scene of the Modern. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmann, Richard. (1996) Selling Culture: Magazines, Markets and Class at the Turn of the Century. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, John G. (2001) Conrad and Impressionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proust, Marcel. (2003) In Search of Lost Time, trans. C. K. Scott Moncrieff and R. Howard. London: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, Lawrence. (2009) Institutions of Modernism: Literary Elites and Public Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Dorothy. (1979) ‘March Moonlight’, in Pilgrimage, vol. 4. London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, May. (1918) ‘The Novels of Dorothy Richardson’, The Egoist, 5 (4): 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Jeffrey. (1994) The Popular Culture of Modern Art: Picasso, Duchamp and Avant-gardism, 1909–17. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeats, W. B. (1990) A Vision and Related Writings, ed. A. N. Jeffares. London: Arena.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shiach, M. (2018). Coda: Immaterial Labour and the Modernist Work of Literature. In: Waithe, M., White, C. (eds) The Labour of Literature in Britain and France, 1830-1910. Palgrave Studies in Nineteenth-Century Writing and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55253-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics