Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anonymity, Confidentiality and Informed Consent: Exploring Ethical Quandaries and Dilemmas in Research with and About Disabled Children’s Childhoods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Palgrave Handbook of Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies

Abstract

  • The underlying premise on which this chapter is based is the right of all children to have their voices heard, regardless of any impairment. From this perspective, the ethics of research with disabled children apply to all children, but research with some more vulnerable children may need additional thought on the part of the researcher. The chapter does not pretend to offer conclusive answers, but rather encourages researchers and others to consider the current and ongoing implications of research undertaken with children and young people.

  • What does informed consent mean in research with disabled children? Does this differ from assent? How can we avoid excluding children from research on the grounds of lack of competency?

  • What do parent or other significant adult researchers need to consider when reporting their own and their disabled children’s experiences?

  • How might a young person or an adult view what was written about them in a research account about their childhood experiences written when they were a child?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alderson, P. (2014). Ethics. In A. Clark, R. Flewitt, M. Hammersley, & M. Robb (Eds.), Understanding Research with Children and Young People. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • BERA. (2011). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. London: British Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocks, A. J. (2006). The Ethical Maze: Finding an Inclusive Path Towards Gaining Children’s Agreement to Research Participation. Childhood, 13(2), 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connors, C., & Stalker, K. (2007). Children’s Experiences of Disability: Pointers to a Social Model of Childhood Disability. Disability & Society, 22(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, T., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: A Distinct Approach? Disability & Society, 29(10), 1617–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. (2007). Telling Secrets, Revealing Lives: Relational Ethics in Research with Intimate Others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabb, J. (2009). Researching Family Relationships: A Qualitative Mixed Methods Approach. Methodological Innovations Online, 4(2), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabb, J. (2010). Home Truths: Ethical Issues in Family Research. Qualitative Research, 10(4), 461–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W. (2009). Applying the ‘Experience-near’ Principle to Research: Psychoanalytically Informed Methods. Journal of Social Work Practice, 23(4), 461–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Biography, Anxiety and the Experience of Locality. In P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat, & T. Wengraf (Eds.), The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science (pp. 167–180). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2013). Doing Qualitative Research Differently: A Psychosocial Approach (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lauwers, H., & Van Hove, G. (2010). Supporting the Participation Rights of Children in a Sensitive Research Project: The Case of Young Road Traffic Victims. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 18(3), 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundy, L., McEvoy, L., & Byrne, B. (2011). Working with Young Children as Co-Researchers: An Approach Informed by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Early Education and Development, 22(5), 714–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeilly, P., Macdonald, G., & Kelly, B. (2015). The Participation of Disabled Children and Young People: A Social Justice Perspective. Child Care in Practice, 21(3), 266–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meerwald, A. M. L. (2013). Researcher | Researched: Repositioning Research Paradigms. Higher Education Research and Development, 32(1), 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, B., & West, L. (2009). Using Biographical Methods in Social Research. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, B. L. (2010). Secrets of Mothering. PhD unpublished, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, L., Pushor, D., & Renihan, P. (2011). Reflections on the Ethics-Approval Process. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuremberg Code. (1947). Directives for Human Experimentation. http://ori.hhs.gov/ori-introduction-responsible-conduct-research. Accessed 31 Aug 2015.

  • Page, J. M. (2013). Childcare Choices and Voices: Using Interpreted Narratives and Thematic Meaning-Making to Analyse Mothers’ Life Histories. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(7), 850–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K., & Pool, S. (2011). Living Your Life Because it’s the Only Life You’ve Got. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (2003). The Mother/Researcher in Blurred Boundaries of a Reflexive Research Process. Auto/Biography, 11(1&2), 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (2007). Experiencing an “Inclusive” Education: Parents and Their Children with “Special Educational Needs”. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(1), 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, B., Kitzinger, J., & Kitzinger, C. (2015). Anonymising Interview Data: Challenges and Compromise in Practice. Qualitative Research, 15(5), 616–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikes, P. (2000). Truth and Lies Revisited. British Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L. (1992). The Auto/Biographical I. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, A. J. M. (1965). Myth and Attitude Change. Human Relations, 18(4), 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thackray, L. (2013). The Meanings of the ‘Struggle/Fight Metaphor’ in the Special Needs Domain: The Experiences of Practitioners and Parents of Children with High Functioning Autism Spectrum Conditions, PhD unpublished, University of Sussex. Retrieved from http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/47168/

  • Truss, C. (2008). Peter’s Story: Reconceptualising the UK SEN System. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23(4), 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC. (1989). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. http://www.unicef.org.uk/UNICEFs-Work/UN-Convention/. Accessed 31 Aug 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Open University, Milton Keynes, UK

    Liz Thackray

Authors
  1. Liz Thackray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The School of Education, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom

    Katherine Runswick-Cole

  2. Department of Health and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom

    Tillie Curran

  3. The School of Education, Sheffield, United Kingdom

    Kirsty Liddiard

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thackray, L. (2018). Anonymity, Confidentiality and Informed Consent: Exploring Ethical Quandaries and Dilemmas in Research with and About Disabled Children’s Childhoods. In: Runswick-Cole, K., Curran, T., Liddiard, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54446-9_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54446-9_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54445-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54446-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation