Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Thinking and Doing Consent and Advocacy in Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beresford, B., Tozer, R., Rabiee, P., & Sloper, P. (2004). Developing an Approach to Involving Children with ASD in a Social Care Research Project. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(4), 180–185. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3156.2004.00318.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billington, T. (2006). Autism: Speculation, Knowledge or Understanding? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 27(2), 275–285. doi:10.1080/01596300600676292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. (2008). The Ethics of Social Research. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching Social Life (3rd ed., pp. 145–161). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2004). Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. (2008). Autoethnography as Method (Vol. 1). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P., & James, A. (2008). Introduction: Researching Children and Childhood Cultures of Communication. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices (2nd ed., pp. 1–10). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P., & O’Brien, M. (Eds.). (2003). Children in the City: Home Neighbourhood and Community. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2005). Listening to and Involving Young Children: A Review of Research and Practice. Early Child Development and Care, 175(6), 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, T. (2013). Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: Alternative Relations and Forms of Authority? In T. Curran & K. Runswick-Cole (Eds.), Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: Critical Approaches in a Global Context (pp. 121–135). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, T., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2013). Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies Critical Approaches in a Global Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, T., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: A Distinct Approach? Disability & Society, 29(10), 1617–1630. doi:10.1080/09687599.2014.966187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danby, S. J. (2002). The Communicative Competence of Young Children. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 27(3), 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., Browne, J., Gannon, S., Honan, E., Laws, C., Mueller-Rockstroh, B., & Petersen, E. B. (2004). The Ambivalent Practices of Reflexivity. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(3), 360–389. doi:10.1177/1077800403257638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. (2012). Conceptual Issues in Childhood and Disability: Integrating Theories from Childhood and Disability Studies. In N. Watson, A. Roulstone, & C. Thomas (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies (pp. 414–425). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J., Watson, N., & Cunningham-Burley, S. (2008). Learning the Lives of Disabled Children: Developing a Reflexive Approach. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices (pp. 201–224). London: Routledge Flamer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1996). Interpretive Ethnography: Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. S. (2007). Telling Secrets, Revealing Lives Relational Ethics in Research with Intimate Others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29. doi:10.1177/1077800406294947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/Ability Studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Becoming Dishuman: Thinking About the Human Through Dis/ability. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37, 1–15. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.930021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D., Runswick-Cole, K., & Liddiard, K. (2016). The DisHuman Child. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(5), 770–784. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1075731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, A. (2014). Zigging and Zooming All Over the Place: Young Children’s Meaning Making and Movement in the Museum. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 14(1), 5–27. doi:10.1177/1468798412453730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, A. (2015). Young Children as Wayfarers: Learning About Place by Moving Through It. Children and Society. doi:10.1111/chso.12130.

  • Homan, R. (1992). The Ethics of Open Methods. British Journal of Sociology, 43, 321–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Prout, A. (1997). Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, B. (2008). Conversations with Children: Working with Generational Issues. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices (2nd ed., pp. 109–124). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, A. (2010). Disability, Non-disability and the Politics of Mourning: Re-conceiving the ‘We’. Disability Studies Quarterly, 30(3/4). Retrived from http://dsq-sds.org/.

  • Medford, K. (2006). Caught with a Fake ID Ethical Questions About Slippage in Autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(5), 853–864. doi:10.1177/1077800406288618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. (1998). Don’t Leave Us Out: Involving Disabled Children and Young People with Communication Impairments. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation/York Publishing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. (2003). Including All Children: Finding Out About the Experiences of Children with Communication and/or Cognitive Impairments. Children & Society, 17(5), 337–348. doi:10.1002/CHI.754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulsford, M. (2014, June 19–20). Rupturing Narratives: Material-Discursive Entanglements and the Becoming-Other of Male Primary Teachers. Paper Presented at Troubling Narratives: Identity Matters at Huddersfield University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabiee, P., Sloper, P., & Beresford, B. (2005). Doing Research with Children and Young People Who Do Not Use Speech for Communication. Children & Society, 19(5), 385–396. doi:10.1002/chi.841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. C. (2016a). The Embodied Becoming of Autism and Childhood: A Storytelling Methodology. Disability & Society, 31(2), 180–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. C. (2016b). The Talking, Being, and Becoming of Autism, Childhood, and Dis/ability. Unpublished PhD Thesis, The University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchkosky, T. (2007). Reading and Writing Disability Differently: The Textured Life of Embodiment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolich, M. (2010). A Critique of Current Practice: Ten Foundational Guidelines for Autoethnographers. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1599–1610. doi:10.1177/1049732310376076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, N. (2012). Theorising the Lives of Disabled Children: How Can Disability Theory Help? Children & Society, 26(3), 192–202. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2012.00432.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK

    Jill Pluquailec PhD

Authors
  1. Jill Pluquailec PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The School of Education, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom

    Katherine Runswick-Cole

  2. Department of Health and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom

    Tillie Curran

  3. The School of Education, Sheffield, United Kingdom

    Kirsty Liddiard

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pluquailec, J. (2018). Thinking and Doing Consent and Advocacy in Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies Research. In: Runswick-Cole, K., Curran, T., Liddiard, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54446-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54446-9_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54445-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54446-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation