Abstract
Working in groups is a popular teaching strategy associated with communicative, task-based and other approaches in ELT. Learner autonomy has also become an influential concept and has been linked to groupwork. However, ideas about how learner autonomy (often seen as a set of skills in an individual) might develop through groupwork have tended to develop by practice and intuition more than through research. This chapter will consider some relevant questions about learner autonomy and groupwork, for example, individual autonomy in a group, learner support, autonomy development, group autonomy and conditions for group and individual autonomy. It will also discuss research approaches which have proved useful in other fields and how these might be applied in language learning and teaching contexts.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Allen, N. J., & Hecht, T. D. (2004). The ‘romance of teams’: Toward an understanding of its psychological underpinnings and implications. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(4), 439–461.
Allwright, D. (1990). Autonomy in language pedagogy. CRILE working paper 6. Centre for Research in Education, University of Lancaster.
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78.
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.
Benson, P., & Cooker, L. (2013). The applied linguistic individual. London: Equinox.
Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (2013). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. II, pp. 269–292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Boekaerts, M. (2011). What have we learned about the social context – Student engagement link? Teachers College Record, 113(2), 375–393.
Boud, D. (Ed.). (1981). Developing student autonomy in learning (Vol. 12). London: Routledge.
Cambridge English. (2014). Cambridge English teaching framework. http://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/172992-full-level-descriptors-cambridge-english-teaching-framework.pdf
Carvalho, J. A. (2000). Knowledge needs of self-organized systems. In Y. Malhotra (Ed.), Knowledge management and virtual organizations (pp. 350–364). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
Chang, L. Y. H. (2007). The influences of group processes on learners’ autonomous beliefs and behaviors. System, 35(3), 322–337.
Chik, A., & Breidbach, S. (2011). Online language learning histories exchange: Hong Kong and German perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 45(3), 553–564.
Cloward, R. D. (1967). Studies in tutoring. The Journal of Experimental Education, 36(1), 14–25.
Conner, J. O. (2009). Student engagement in an independent research project. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(1), 8–38.
Cooker, L. (2013). “When I got a person to communicate with, I got a purpose to learn”: Evidence for social “modes of autonomy”. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 29–49.
Dam, L. (1995). Learner autonomy 3: From theory to classroom practice. Dublin, Ireland: Authentik.
Department for Education. (2014). The national curriculum in England: Framework document. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/335116/Master_final_national_curriculum_220714.pdf
Ding, F. (2015). Transition from mainland schools to an English-medium Hong Kong university: A longitudinal study of learner autonomy development. PhD thesis, Hong Kong Institute of Education.
Godin, S. (2010). It’s easier to teach compliance than initiative. Blog post. http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2010/02/its-easier-to-teach-compliance-than-initiative.html
Greenaway, K. H., Haslam, S. A., Cruwys, T., Branscombe, N. R., Ysseldyk, R., & Heldreth, C. (2015). From “we” to “me”: Group identification enhances perceived personal control with consequences for health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 53–74.
Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. (2011). Socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 240–264.
Hammond, K., & Danaher, K. (2012). The value of targeted comic book readers. ELT Journal, 66(2), 193–204.
Heylighen, F. (1999). Collective intelligence and its implementation on the web: Algorithms to develop a collective mental map. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 5(3), 253–280.
Holliday, A. (1999). Small cultures. Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 237–264.
Howe, C. (2013). Scaffolding in context: Peer interaction and abstract learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2(1), 3–10.
Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 350–374.
Jdaitawi, M. (2015). Social connectedness, academic, non-academic behaviors related to self-regulation among university students in Saudi Arabia. International Education Studies, 8(2), 84–101.
Jensen, M., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Impact of positive interdependence during electronic quizzes on discourse and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(3), 161–166.
Jensen, M. S. (1996). Cooperative quizzes in the anatomy and physiology laboratory: A description and evaluation. The American Journal of Physiology, 271(6 Pt 3), S48–S54.
Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1998). Cooperation in the classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Social skills for successful group work. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 29–33.
Kao, S.-H. (2011). Developing learner autonomy through peer teaching experiences. In B. Morrison (Ed.), Independent language learning: Building on experience, seeking new perspectives (pp. 131–144). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Kojima, H. (2012). Positive interdependence for teacher and learner autonomy: The case of the CARTA program. In K. Irie & A. Stewart (Eds.), Realizing autonomy: Practice and reflection in language education contexts (pp. 167–181). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Komissarouk, S., & Nadler, A. (2014). “I” seek autonomy, “we” rely on each other: Self-construal and regulatory focus as determinants of autonomy- and dependency-oriented help-seeking behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(6), 726–738.
Kuchah, K., & Smith, R. (2011). Pedagogy of autonomy for difficult circumstances: From practice to principles. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 119–140.
Lamb, M. (2013). The struggle to belong: Individual language learners in situated learning theory. In P. Benson & L. Cooker (Eds.), The applied linguistic individual: Autonomy, agency and identity (pp. 32–45). London: Equinox.
Lamb, M., & Smith, R. (2013). Posts in ‘autonomous language learning in developing countries’. [AUTO-L discussion list].
Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Sociocultural theory and the dialectics of L2 learner autonomy/agency. In P. Benson & L. Cooker (Eds.), The applied linguistic individual: Autonomy, agency and identity (pp. 17–31). London: Equinox.
Lewis, T. (2014). Learner autonomy and the theory of sociality. In G. Murray (Ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 37–59). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Liang, X., Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (2013). Peer assistance in an English immersion context in China. In L. Jin & M. Cortazzi (Eds.), Researching intercultural learning: Investigations in language and education (pp. 99–116). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14–29.
Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71–94.
Littlewood, W. (2002). Cooperative and collaborative learning tasks as pathways towards autonomous interdependence. In P. Benson & S. Toogood (Eds.), Learner autonomy 7: Challenges to research and practice (pp. 29–40). Dublin, Ireland: Authentik.
Macaro, E. (2007). The shifting dimensions of language learner autonomy. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses (pp. 47–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Maylone, M. M., Ranieri, L., Quinn Griffin, M. T., McNulty, R., & Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2011). Collaboration and autonomy: Perceptions among nurse practitioners. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 23(1), 51–57.
Meirink, J. A., Imants, J., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2010). Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(2), 161–181.
Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2007). A closer look at teachers’ individual learning in collaborative settings. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 145–164.
Mideros, D., & Carter, B.-A. (2014). Meeting the autonomy challenge in an advanced Spanish listening class. In G. Murray (Ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 135–151). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Murray, G. (2014). Autonomy in language learning as a social construct. In G. Murray (Ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 233–249). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning, and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 143–179.
National Qualifications Authority. (2012). Qualifications framework emirates handbook. http://www.nqa.gov.ae/En/QFEmirates/QualificationsFramework
O’Leary, C. (2014). Developing autonomous language learners in higher education: A social constructivist perspective. In G. Murray (Ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 15–36). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Oxford, R. L. (2003). Toward a more systematic model of second language learner autonomy. In D. Palfreyman & R. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures (pp. 75–91). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Palfreyman, D. M. (2014). The ecology of learner autonomy. In G. Murray (Ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 175–191). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Panadero, E., Kirschner, P. A., Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., & Järvenoja, H. (2015). How individual self-regulation affects group regulation and performance: A shared regulation intervention. Small Group Research, 46(4), 431–454.
Reichert, M., & Hawley, R. (2014). I can learn from you: Boys as relational learners. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Smith, R. (2001). Group work for autonomy in Asia: Insights from teacher-research. In L. Dam (Ed.), Learner autonomy: New insights (pp. 70–81). Huddersfield, UK: AILA/Catchline.
Tassinari, G. (2012). Dynamic autonomy model with descriptors. http://www.sprachenzentrum.fu-berlin.de/en/slz/lernberatung/autonomiemodell/index.html
Tassinari, G. (2013). Learner autonomy and group work. AUTO-L discussion.
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organization Management, 2(4), 419–427.
Tuomela, R. (2007). The philosophy of sociality: The shared point of view. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ushioda, E. (2015). Context and complex dynamic systems theory. In Z. Dörnyei, A. Henry, & P. D. MacIntyre (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 47–54). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer.
Warfield, J. N. (1995). Spreadthink: Explaining ineffective groups. Systems Research, 12(1), 5–14.
Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (1997). A dialogical framework for investigating talk. In R. Wegerif & P. Scrimshaw (Eds.), Computers and talk in the primary classroom (pp. 49–65). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
White, C. (2011). Inside independent learning: Old and new perspectives. In B. Morrison (Ed.), Independent language learning (pp. 14–23). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Wilkinson, R. (2010). Teaching for autonomy: What do the students think? Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 23, 107–132.
Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330(6004), 686–688.
Xu, J. (2011). Homework emotion management at the secondary school level: Antecedents and homework completion. Teachers College Record, 113(3), 529–560.
Yashima, T. (2014). International posture and the ideal L2 self in the Japanese EFL context. In G. Murray (Ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 60–77). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Palfreyman, D.M. (2018). Learner Autonomy and Groups. In: Chik, A., Aoki, N., Smith, R. (eds) Autonomy in Language Learning and Teaching. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52998-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52998-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52997-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52998-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)