Abstract
This chapter sets the frame within which children’s mobilities are discussed throughout the book: focusing on the particularities of children’s mobile practices and experiences, while addressing their relationalities and interdependencies in relation to other people’s mobilities, and in relation to time, space and materialities. As childhood is relational and as mobilities are relational, so too are children’s mobilities. By relational, we mean that children’s mobilities are constituted through relations between them and other people, spaces, times, materials, imaginings and so on, with the task of this book being to determine the scope and character of this relationality. This is done so from a mobilities perspectives, understanding mobility not only as children’s corporeal movements but in terms of the intersecting movements of bodies, objects, spaces and ideas through different means, contributing to a broader understanding of children’s mobilities and to a critical understanding of childhood.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Barker, J. (2011). ‘Manic mums’ and ‘distant dads’? Gendered geographies of care and the journey to school. Health & Place, 17, 413–421.
BBC. (2017, November 10). The 13-year-old boy who stole a bus to help his family, BBC Stories.
Buliung, R., Sultana, S., & Faulkner, G. (2012). Guest editorial: Special section on child and youth mobility—Current research and nascent themes. Journal of Transport Geography, 20, 31–33.
Büscher, M., Urry, J., & Witchger, K. (2010). Mobile methods. London: Routledge.
Clark, H. M. (2017). Who rides public transportation? Washington: American Public Transportation Association.
Cortés-Morales, S. (2015). From cocooning to Skyping: An ethnographic study of young children’s everyday mobilities in an English town (PhD thesis). University of Leeds.
Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. London: Routledge.
Cresswell, T. (2011). Mobilities I: Catching up. Progress in Human Geography, 35(4), 550–558.
Fincham, B., McGuinness, M., & Murray, L. (2010). Mobile methodologies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gilroy, R., Attuyer, K., Bevan, M., Croucher, K., & Tunstall, R. (2016). Moving between generations? The role of familial inter-generational relations in older people’s mobility. In L. Murray & S. Robertson (Eds.), Intergenerational mobilities. London: Routledge.
Hammersley, M. (2017). Childhood studies: A sustainable paradigm? Childhood, 24(1), 113–127.
Holdsworth, C. (2013). Family and intimate mobilities. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holdsworth, C. (2014). Child. In P. Adey, D. Bissell, K. Hannam, P. Merriman, & M. Sheller (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of mobilities. London: Routledge.
James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jensen, O. B. (2013). Staging mobilities. London: Routledge.
Kullman, K. (2010). Transitional geographies: Making mobile children. Social and Cultural Geography, 11, 827–844.
Kullman, K., & Palludan, C. (2011). Rhythmanalytical sketches: Agencies, school journeys, temporalities. Children’s Geographies, 9(3–4), 347–359.
Leonard, M. (2016). The sociology of children, childhood and generation. London: Sage.
Mikkelsen, M., & Christensen, P. (2009). Is children’s independent mobility really independent? A study of children’s independent mobility combining ethnography and GPS/mobile phones technologies. Mobilities, 4(1), 37–58.
Mock, B. (2017). Louisville confronts its redlining past and present. Citylab. https://www.citylab.com/equity/2017/02/louisville-confronts-its-redlining-past-and-present/517125/. Accessed 17 July 2018.
Murray, L. (2009). Looking at and looking back: Visualization in mobile research. Qualitative Research, 9(4), 469–488.
Nansen, B., Gibbs, L., MacDougall, C.‚ Vetere, F.‚ Ross, N., & McKendrick, J. (2015). Children’s interdependent mobility: Compositions, collaborations and compromises. Children’s Geographies, 13(4), 467–481.
Pink, S. (2007). Doing visual ethnography. London: Sage.
Pink, S. (2015). Doing sensory ethnography (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226.
Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murray, L., Cortés-Morales, S. (2019). Relational, Interdependent, Imagined Mobilities. In: Children's Mobilities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52114-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52114-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52113-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52114-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)