Abstract
In this chapter, we address the philosophical debate about an inclusive society in relation to organising an event that aims to build accessible sport facilities, develop sport pathways and influence societal understandings of disability. The push and pull between integration for the purpose of efficiency of resources, and separation (of roles, of logos etc.) for distinction and recognition, is a challenge that every Organising Committee (OC) faces when developing the overall structure and defining the Paralympic brand. Through a case example of the Vancouver 2010 Paralympic Games, we demonstrate the tension in organising the Paralympic Games, emphasising the balance required, and the inherent need for, and importance of a successful Games. In particular, we frame our discussion around the idea of distinction from the perspective of the OC from the very outset of involvement (i.e. the Bid Process) to the conclusion of the Games and ceasing of existence of this very committee.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Department of Culture, Media, and Sport. 2013. Report 5: Post-Games Evaluation Meta-Evaluation of the Impacts and Legacy of the London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games. https://www.gov.uk/government/…data/…/1188-B_Meta_Evaluation.pdf
Emery, P. 2015. The Bidders and Promoters’ Perspective. In Routledge Handbook of Sports Event Management, ed. M. Parent and J.L. Cappelet, 20–42. New York and London: Routledge.
Enos, M., S. Busse, R. Davis, and N. Megginson. 2012. The Influence of Paralympic Game Proposals on Successfully Hosting the Olympics. Palaestra 26 (3): 53–55.
Gilbert, K., and O. Shantz. 2008. The Paralympic Games: Empowerment or Sideshow? New York and Maidenhead: Meyer & Meyer.
Gold, J., and M. Gold. 2007. Access for All: The Rise of the Paralympic Games. Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 127 (3): 133–141.
International Olympic Committee. 2006. IOC and IPC Sign Agreement Extension for 2014 and 2016. Olympic.org: http://www.olympic.org/content/news/media-resources/manual-news
———. 2008. Games of the XXXI Olympiad 2016 Working Group Report. www.olympic.org/documents/reports/en/en_report_1317.pdf
———. 2012. IOC and IPC Sign Agreement Extension Until 2020. Olympic.org: http://www.olympic.org/news/ioc-and-ipc
———. 2013. Olympic Charter. Olympic.org: http://www.olympic.org/Documents/olympic_charter_en.pdf
———. 2014. Olympic Games Impact (OGI) Assessment Framework. International Olympic Committee.
———. 2016. IOC and IPC Sign Long-Term Agreement Supporting the Paralympic Movement. https://www.olympic.org/news/ioc-and-ipc-sign-long-term-agreement-supporting-the-paralympic-movement
International Paralympic Committee. 2013. IPC Handbook, November 2013, Paralympic Games, Organisation Principles, Section 1, Chapter 3. www.paralympic.org/the-ipc/handbook
———. 2014. Sochi 2014 Paralympics Watched by Over Two Billion Viewers. http://www.paralympic.org/news/sochi-2014-paralympics-watched-over-two-billion-viewers
———. 2015. Brand Book of the International Paralympic Committee. www.paralympic.org_ipc_13_brandbook_13020
Jacobs, N., and L. Misener. 2013. IOC and IPC Strategic Alliances Through Time. Paper presented at the North American Society for Sport Management Conference. May 27–June 1, Austin, TX.
Misener, L. 2014. Leveraging Parasport Events for Community Participation: Development of a Theoretical Framework. European Sport Management Quarterly 15 (1): 132–153.
Parent, M. 2015. The Organizing Committee’s Perspective. In Routledge Handbook of Sports Event Management, ed. M. Parent and J. Chappelet, 43–61. New York and London: Routledge.
Parent, M., and J. Chappelet. 2015. Routledge Handbook of Sports Event Management. London: Routledge.
Parent, M., and S. Smith-Swan. 2013. Managing Major Sports Events: Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
Purdue, D. 2013. An (In)convenient Truce? Paralympic Stakeholders’ Reflections on the Olympic-Paralympic Relationship. Journal of Sport & Social Issues 37 (4): 384–402.
VANOC. 2003. Host City Contract for the XXI Olympic Winter Games. http://www.gamesmonitor.org.uk/files/09-Host_City_Agreement.pdf
———. 2010a. PPL Games Knowledge Report. Vancouver, BC: VANOC.
———. 2010b. Staging the Olympic Winter Games Knowledge Report. Vancouver: VANOC.
World Health Organization. 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Misener, L., Molloy, K. (2018). Organising and Delivering the Modern Paralympic Games: Contemporary Debates Relating to Integration and Distinction. In: Brittain, I., Beacom, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Paralympic Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47901-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47901-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47900-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47901-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)