Abstract
Heinz Kurz has made major contributions to our understanding of long-period production—interdependent models inspired by Piero Sraffa’s classic writings (see, for example, Kurz and Salvadori, 1995). In doing so he has, on the whole, sided with the view of Pierangelo Garegnani, John Eatwell and Murray Milgate (see, for example, Eatwell, 1997) that, traditionally and necessarily, rigorous economic theory can only be long period in the sense of analyzing relationships between dominant, persistent forces at work in the economy. This implies that there is no place, or at least little fundamental place, for a theory of the short period in its own right: this is so, despite Richard Kahn’s superb, path-breaking 1929 Fellowship Dissertation for King’s College, Cambridge, “The economics of the short period”1, and the dominant view of Keynes scholars that the analysis of The General Theory itself is mainly placed in a short-period setting, as it is in Michał Kalecki’s approach in his analysis of accumulation, the cycle and growth. The last occurred in Keynes’s own as well as others’ contributions, not least because of Kahn’s key influence on the development of Keynes’s thought as he moved from A Treatise on Money (1930) to The General Theory (1936) (see Harcourt, 1994; 1995, Ch 5).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arestis, Philip, Michelle Baddeley and John S.L. McCombie (eds.) (2007), Economic Growth. New Directions in Theory and Policy, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
Arestis, Philip, Gabriel Palma and Malcolm Sawyer (eds.) (1997), Capital Controversy, Post-Keynesian Economics and the History of Economics. Essays in honour of Geoff Harcourt, volume one. London and New York: Routledge.
Bhaduri, Amit and Joan Robinson (1980), “Accumulation and exploitation: an analysis in the tradition of Marx, Sraffa and Kalecki”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 4, 103–15.
Eatwell, John (1997), “History versus equilibrium” in Arestis, Palma and Sawyer (eds.) (1997), 386–97.
Goodwin, R.M. (1982), Essays in Economic Dynamics, London: Macmillan.
Granger, Clive (1992), “What are we learning about the long-run?”, Economic Journal, 103, 307–17.
Guillebaud, C.W. (1952), “Marshall’s Principles of Economics in the light of contemporary economic thought”, Economica, 19, 111–30.
Harcourt, G.C. (1965), “A two-sector model of the distribution of income and the level of employment in the short run”, Economic Record, 41, 103–17, reprinted in Sardoni (ed.) (1992), 83–98.
Harcourt, G.C. (1981), “Marshall, Sraffa and Keynes: Incompatible bedfellows?”, Eastern Economic Journal, 5, 39–50, reprinted in Sardoni (ed.) (1992), 250–64.
Harcourt, G.C. (1985), “A twentieth-century eclectic: Richard Goodwin”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 7, 410–21, reprinted in Sardoni (ed.) (1992), 379–87.
Harcourt, G.C. (1994), “Kahn and Keynes and the making of The General Theory”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 17, 11–23; reprinted in Harcourt (1995), 47–62.
Harcourt. G. C. (1995) Capitalism, Socialism and Post-Keynesianism: Selected Essays of G.C. Harcourt, Cheltenham,Glos.: Edward Elgar.
Harcourt, G.C. (2006), The Structure of Post-Keynesian Economics. The Core Contributions of the Pioneers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harcourt, G.C. (2007), “The relevance of the Cambridge — Cambridge controversies in capital theory for econometric practice” in Arestis, Baddeley and McCombie (eds.) (2007), 117–35.
Harcourt, G.C. and Prue Kerr (2009), Joan Robinson, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Harrod, R.F. (1939), “An essay in dynamic theory”, Economic Journal, 49, 14–33.
Harrod, R.F. (1948), Towards a Dynamic Economics: Some Recent Developments of Economic Theory and Their Application to Policy, London: Macmillan.
Hart, Neil (2009), Marshall’s Equilibrium and Evolution: Then and Now, unpublished Ph.D Dissertation, School of Economics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Hart, Neil (2012), Equilibrium and Evolution: Alfred Marshall and the Marshallians, Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hart, Neil (2013), Alfred Marshall and Modern Economics: Equilibrium Theory and Evolutionary Economics, Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kahn, R.F. (1929; 1989), The Economics of the Short Period, Fellowship Dissertation for King’s College Cambridge, published in 1989 in London: Macmillan.
Kahn, R.F. (1959), “Exercises in economic growth”, Oxford Economic Papers, 11, 143–56.
Kalecki, M. (1968), “Trend and business cycles reconsidered,” Economic Journal, 78, 263–76; reprinted in Kalecki (1971), 165–83.
Kalecki, M. (1971), Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy, 1933–1970, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keynes, J.M. (1930), A Treatise on Money, 2 vols., London: Macmillan, C.W., vols V, VI, 1971.
Keynes, J.M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmillan, C.W., vol VII, 1973.
Keynes, J.M. (1973), The General Theory and After, Part 11: Defence and Development, C.W., vol XIV, London: Macmillan.
Kriesler, P. (1999), “Harcourt, Hicks and Lowe: incompatible bedfellows?” in Sardoni and Kriesler (eds) (1999), 400–417.
Kurz, Heinz D. (2010), “On the dismal state of a dismal science?”, Homo Oeconomicus, 27, 1–21.
Kurz, Heinz D. and Neri Salvadori (1995), Theory of Production. A Long-Period Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lucas, R.E. (1988), “On the mechanics of economic development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42.
Marglin, S.A. (1984a), “Growth, distribution and inflation: a centennial synthesis”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8, 115–44.
Marglin, S.A. (1984b), Growth, Distribution and Prices, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Robertson, D.H. (1956), Economic Commentaries, London: Staples Press.
Robinson, E.A.G. (ed.) (1965), Problems in Economic Development, London: Macmillan.
Robinson, Joan (1962), Review of H.G. Johnson, Money, Trade and Economic Growth (1962), Economic Journal, 72, 690–2; reprinted in CEP, vol III, 1965, 100–2.
Robinson, Joan (1971), Economic Heresies: Some Old-Fashioned Questions in Economic Theory, London: Macmillan.
Salter, W.E.G. (1960), Productivity and Technical Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salter, W.E.G. (1965), “Productivity and accumulation as historial processes” in E.A.G. Robinson (ed.) (1965), 266–91.
Sardoni, C. (ed.) (1992), On Political Economists and Modern Political Economy. Selected Essays of G.C. Harcourt, London: Routledge.
Sardoni, C. and P. Kriesler (eds) (1999), Keynes, Post-Keynesianism and Political Economy. Essays in honour of Geoff Harcourt, Volume Three, London: Routledge.
Sinha, Ajit (2010), Theories of Value from Adam Smith to Piero Sraffa, London, New York, New Delhi: Routledge.
Solow, R.M. (1997), “Is there a core of usable macroeconomics we should all believe in?” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 87, 230–32.
Sraffa, P. with the collaboration of M.H. Dobb (eds.) (1951–73), Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, 11 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Copyright information
© 2016 Joseph Halevi, G. C. Harcourt, Peter Kriesler and J. W. Nevile
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harcourt, G.C. (2016). On the Concepts of Period and Run in Economic Theory. In: Post-Keynesian Essays from Down Under Volume IV: Essays on Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47529-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47529-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47528-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47529-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)