Skip to main content

The Denial of Global Warming

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

No book about the science of climate reconstruction would be complete if it did not also address the organized efforts to reject and obfuscate that science. This chapter begins with passages adapted from Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway, Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (2010), which were kindly shared by the authors and publisher. This path-breaking work uncovered links among the tactics and agents involved in organized efforts to cast doubt and disrepute on research and researchers who have demonstrated how certain profitable enterprises have negative health and environmental externalities. Here, we have extended Oreskes and Conway’s account with a discussion of global warming denial in Europe and in Australia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Roach, 2004.

  2. 2.

    Solomon et al., 2007, 8.

  3. 3.

    Oreskes, 2004, 1686.

  4. 4.

    Time, March 26, 2006. Contrast this with the results of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Third Assessment Report, which states unequivocally that average global temperatures have risen. IPCC, 2001.

  5. 5.

    Langer, 2006. For a related poll, see also Pew Center, July 12, 2006.

  6. 6.

    Fleming, 1998, 2007; Weart, 2008.

  7. 7.

    Kerr, 1989, 1041–43.

  8. 8.

    Jastrow et al., 1990.

  9. 9.

    Roberts, 1989, 992–93.

  10. 10.

    Roberts, 1989, 992–93.

  11. 11.

    Roberts, 1989, 992–93.

  12. 12.

    Houghton et al., 1990; see also Weisskopf and Booth, May 26, 1990, 1.

  13. 13.

    Houghton et al., 1990, 63.

  14. 14.

    Bolin, 2007, 72; Nierenberg described the Marshall Institute’s estimate as climate sensitive (1991, 10).

  15. 15.

    Deborah Day, personal communication with Naomi Oreskes 2008.

  16. 16.

    Bill Kristol to Sam Skinner et al., Attachment—Chart B, April 23, 1992, Jeffrey Holmstead, file “Global Warming Implications,” OA/ID CF01875, Counsels Office, George H.W. Bush Presidential Library, College Station, Texas.

  17. 17.

    Robert Jastrow to Terry Yosle, February 22, 1991, WAN papers, Accession 2001-01, 60: file label “Marshall Institute Correspondence, 1990–1992,” SIO Archives.

  18. 18.

    United Nations, 1992; “United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change,” UNFCC, http://unfccc.int/2860.php (accessed July 4, 2009).

  19. 19.

    Bush, 1993, 924–25.

  20. 20.

    Ramanathan, 1988, 293–99.

  21. 21.

    Santer et al., 1994, 267–85, 1995, 10693–726, 1996, 77–100; Santer and Taylor, 1996, 39–46.

  22. 22.

    Santer and Taylor, 1996, 39–46; Santer writes: “I checked on this. We submitted our paper to Nature in April 1995.” Benjamin Santer, email communication with Naomi Oreskes, October 4, 2009; Santer, interview with Conway, February 20, 2009; Houghton, 1996.

  23. 23.

    Michael Oppenheimer as quoted in Stevens, 1999.

  24. 24.

    IPCC Second Assessment Report; Bolin, 2007.

  25. 25.

    Stevens, 1999; Stevens, September 10, 1995.

  26. 26.

    Jaquith, August 10, 2006.

  27. 27.

    Michaels, 1984, 143–56, 1983, 1296–303.

  28. 28.

    Michaels, 1991, 1992.

  29. 29.

    New Hope Environmental Services, http://www.nhes.com/ (accessed October 9, 2009); see discussion in Gelbspan, 1997, 41–43; Oreskes, 2011. According to Gelbspan, Michaels’ publication started as World Climate Review, then became World Climate Report.

  30. 30.

    Oreskes, 2011.

  31. 31.

    Bill Nierenberg to Fred Seitz (handwritten), November 27, 1995, WAN papers, Accession 2001-01, 70: file label “Frederick Seitz, 1994–1995,” SIO Archives; Schneider and Edwards, 2001, 219–96; Bolin, 2007, 113; Stevens, 1999, 229; Santer interview with Conway, February 20, 2009.

  32. 32.

    Singer, 1996a.

  33. 33.

    Wigley and Singer, 1996, 1481–82.

  34. 34.

    Wigley and Singer, 1996, 1481–82.

  35. 35.

    Gelbspan, 1997; Leggett, 2001. On Pearlman, see Gelbspan, 1997, 119–20.

  36. 36.

    Stevens, 1999, 231.

  37. 37.

    Santer interview with Conway, February 20, 2009.

  38. 38.

    Santer interview with Conway, February 20, 2009.

  39. 39.

    Lahsen, 1999, 111–36.

  40. 40.

    Seitz, June 12, 1996.

  41. 41.

    Avery et al., 1996, 1961–65.

  42. 42.

    Avery et al., 1996, 1963–65.

  43. 43.

    Avery et al., 1996, 1966.

  44. 44.

    Avery et al., 1996, 1961–65.

  45. 45.

    Avery et al., 1996, 1961; see also Bolin, 2007, 129.

  46. 46.

    Singer, July 11, 1996b; see also letters by Frederick Seitz and Hugh Ellsaesser in the same section.

  47. 47.

    Santer, July 23, 1996; see also letter by Bert Bolin and John Houghton in the same section.

  48. 48.

    Gelbspan reprinted this email exchange: Gelbspan, 1997, 230–36.

  49. 49.

    Faxed copy of statement in: Edward Frieman papers, MC 77, 123:7, SIO Archives; see also Mooney, 2005, 62–64.

  50. 50.

    McCright and Dunlap, 2003; Byrd-Hagel Resolution, July 25, 1997, The National Center for Public Policy Research, http://www.nationalcenter.org/KyotoSenate.html (accessed July 1, 2009).

  51. 51.

    James M. Inhofe, “Climate Change Update: Senate Floor Statement by US Senator James M. Inhofe,” January 4, 2005, Floor Speeches, http://inhofe.senate.gov/pressreleases/climateupdate.htm (accessed February 19, 2007).

  52. 52.

    Cheney, 2007.

  53. 53.

    Seidel, 1995; Edwards, 1996; Sontag et al., 1998; Craven, 2001; Westwick, 2003; Oreskes, forthcoming.

  54. 54.

    Hays and Hays, 1987, 491. Rothman prefers to call it a backlash: Rothman, 2000, 158.

  55. 55.

    https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/publications/2006/royal-society-exxonmobil/; https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2006/8257.pdf.

  56. 56.

    Banerjee et al., 2015.

  57. 57.

    http://exxonsecrets.org/em.php, accessed November 1, 2015.

  58. 58.

    Jacques et al., 2008, 349–85.

  59. 59.

    Orwell, 1949.

  60. 60.

    Linden, 2006, 222–23.

  61. 61.

    Weingart et al., 2000.

  62. 62.

    Flohn, 1981, 190.

  63. 63.

    Hulme and Turnpenny, 2004.

  64. 64.

    Neu, 2009.

  65. 65.

    Poortinga et al., 2011.

  66. 66.

    Rahmstorf and Schellnhuber, 2007; http://www.tobaccotactics.org/index.php/European_Science_and_Environment_Forum.

  67. 67.

    Lomborg, 2001, 2007.

  68. 68.

    Jowit, 2010.

  69. 69.

    Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, 2004; Oreskes, 2011.

  70. 70.

    Brand and Pawloff, 2014.

  71. 71.

    CONTRA, http://projects.fas.at/CONTRA/; Engels et al., 2013.

  72. 72.

    Talberg et al., 2015; Hamilton, 2007.

  73. 73.

    Pearman, 1988.

  74. 74.

    Talberg et al., 2015.

  75. 75.

    Talberg et al., 2015.

  76. 76.

    Hamilton, 2007.

  77. 77.

    Lavoisier Group, http://www.lavoisier.com.au/index.php; Enting, 2011.

  78. 78.

    Galileo Movement, http://www.galileomovement.com.au/galileo_movement.php.

  79. 79.

    Manne, 2011.

  80. 80.

    Pearse et al., 2013.

  81. 81.

    https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09.pdf.

References

  • Avery, Susan K. et al. “Open Letter to Ben Santer.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 77 (1996): 1961–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, N. et al. “Exxon’s Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels’ Role in Global Warming Decades Ago.” Inside Climate News, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, B. History of the Science and Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, U., and A. Pawloff. “Selectivities at Work: Climate Concerns in the Midst of Corporatist Interests.” Journal of Environmental Protection 5 (2014): 780–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe. Geo Standpunkt Klima. Geo-Standpunkt, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, G.H.W. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States, George Bush: 1992. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, Dick. Exclusive: Cheney on Global Warming. Interview by Jonathan Karl, February 23, 2007. http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=2898539&page=1.

  • Craven, J.P. The Silent War: The Cold War Battle Beneath the Sea. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, A. et al. “Public Climate-Change Skepticism, Energy Preferences and Political Participation.” Global Environmental Change 23 (2013): 1018–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enting, I. “Rogues or Respectable? How Climate Change Sceptics Spread Doubt and Denial.” The Conversation, June 23, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, James. Historical Perspectives on Climate Change. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, James. The Callendar Effect: The Life and Times of Guy Stewart Callendar (1898–1964), The Scientist Who Established the Carbon Dioxide Theory of Climate Change. Boston: American Meteorological Society, 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flohn, H. “Klimaänderung als Folge der CO2-Zunahme?” Physik Journal 37 (1981): 184–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelbspan, R. The Heat Is On: The High Stakes Battle Over Earth’s Threatened Climate. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. Scorcher: The Dirty Politics of Climate Change. Melbourne: Black Inc. Agenda, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S.P., and B.D. Hays. Beauty, Health, and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955–1985. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, J.T., ed. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, A Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, J.T. et al. Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M., and J. Turnpenny. “Understanding and Managing Climate Change: The UK Experience.” Geographical Journal 170 (2004): 105–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. Climate Change 2001, Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the International Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, P.J. et al. “The Organisation of Denial: Conservative Think Tanks and Environmental Scepticism.” Environmental Politics 17 (2008): 349–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaquith, W. “Does Virginia Really Have a State Climatologist?,” August 10, 2006. http://www.cvillenews.com/2006/08/10/state-climatologist/ (accessed August 22, 2009).

  • Jastrow, R. et al. “Global Warming: What Does the Science Tell Us?” Washington, DC: George C. Marshall Institute, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jowit, J. “Bjørn Lomborg: $100bn a Year Needed to Fight Climate Change.” The Guardian, August 30, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, R.A. “Hansen vs. the World on the Greenhouse Threat.” Science 244 (1989): 1041–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahsen, M. “The Detection and Attribution of Conspiracies: The Controversy over Chapter 8.” In Paranoia within Reason: A Casebook on Conspiracy as Explanation, edited by G.E. Marcus, 111–36. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, G. “Poll: Public Concern on Warming Gains Intensity: Many See a Change in Weather Patterns.” ABC News, March 26, 2006. http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/GlobalWarming/story?id=1750492&page=1.

  • Leggett, J.K. The Carbon War: Global Warming and the End of the Oil Era. New York: Routledge, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, E. The Winds of Change: Climate, Weather, and the Destruction of Civilizations. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg, B. The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg, B. Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist’s Guide to Global Warming. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne, R. “Bad News: Murdoch’s Australian and the Shaping of the Nation.” Quarterly Essay 43 (2011): 1–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCright, A.M., and R.E. Dunlap. “Defeating Kyoto: The Conservative Movement’s Impact on US Climate Change Policy.” Social Problems 50 (2003): 348–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, P.J. “Price, Weather, and ‘Acreage Abandonment’ in Western Great Plains Wheat Culture.” Journal of Applied Climate and Meteorology 22 (1983): 1296–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, P.J. “Climate and the Southern Pine-Beetle in Atlantic Coastal and Piedmont Regions.” Forest Science 30 (1984): 143–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, P.J. “Apocalypse Machine Blows Up.” Washington Times, November 1, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, P.J. “More Hot Air from the Stratosphere.” Washington Times, October 27, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, C. The Republican War on Science. New York: Basic Books, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neu, Urs. “Climate Sceptic Arguments and Their Scientific Background Climate Change Facts.” Zurich: Swiss Reinsurance Company, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nierenberg, W. “Global Warming: Look Before We Leap.” New Scientist 129 (1991): 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N. “Behind the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change.” Science 306 (2004): 1686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N. “My Facts Are Better than Your Facts: Spreading Good News about Global Warming.” In How Well Do Facts Travel? : The Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge, edited by P. Howlett and M.S. Morgan. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N. Science on a Mission: American Oceanography in the Cold War and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, G. 1984. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearman, G.I. Greenhouse: Planning for Climate Change. Melbourne: CSIRO, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearse, G. et al. Big Coal: Australia’s Dirtiest Habit. Sydney: NewSouth Publishing, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Center. “Little Consensus on Global Warming: Partisanship Drives Opinion.” Pew Research Center, July 12, 2006. http://people-press.org/report/280/little-consensus-on-global-warming.

  • “Poll: Americans See a Climate Problem.” Time, March 26, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, W. et al. “Uncertain Climate: An Investigation into Public Scepticism about Anthropogenic Climate Change.” Global Environmental Change 21 (2011): 1015–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmstorf, S., and H.J. Schellnhuber. Der Klimawandel: Diagnose, Prognose, Therapie. Munich: Beck, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, V. “The Greenhouse Theory of Climate Change: A Test by an Inadvertent Global Experiment.” Science 240 (1988): 293–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roach, J. “2004: The Year Global Warming Got Respect.” National Geographic News, December 29, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L. “Global Warming: Blaming the Sun.” Science 246 (1989): 992–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, H. Saving the Planet: The American Responses to the Environment in the Twentieth Century. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santer, B.D. “Global Warming Critics, Chill Out.” The Wall Street Journal, July 23, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santer, B.D., and K.E. Taylor. “A Search for Human Influences on the Thermal Structure of the Atmosphere.” Nature 382 (1996): 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santer, B.D. et al. “Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Time-Dependent Greenhouse Warming Experiments. Part 1: Pattern Analysis.” Climate Dynamics 9 (1994): 267–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santer, B.D. et al. “Ocean Variability and Its Influence on the Detectability of Greenhouse Warming Signals.” Journal of Geophysical Research 100 (1995): 10693–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santer, B.D. et al. “Towards the Detection and Attribution of an Anthropogenic Effect on Climate.” Climate Dynamics 12 (1996): 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S.H., and P.N. Edwards. “Self Governance and Peer Review in Science-for-Policy: The Case of the IPCC Second Assessment Report.” In Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, edited by P.N. Edwards and C.A. Miller. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, R.W. Los Alamos and the Making of the Atomic Bomb. Los Alamos: Otowi Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, F. “A Major Deception on ‘Global Warming’.” The Wall Street Journal, June 12, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, S.F. “Climate Change and Consensus.” Science 271 (1996a): 581–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, S.F. “Coverup in the Greenhouse.” The Wall Street Journal, July 11, 1996b, sec. Letters to the Editor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, S. et al. “Summary for Policy Makers in Climate Change 2007, the Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.” New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. et al. Blind Man’s Bluff: The Untold Story of American Submarine Espionage. New York: Public Affairs, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, W.K. “Global Warming Experts Call Human Role Likely.” The New York Times, September 10, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, W.K. The Change in the Weather: People, Weather, and the Science of Climate. New York: Delacorte Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talberg, A. et al. Australian Climate Change Policy to November 2013: A Chronology. Canberra: Parliamentary Library, Parliament of Australia, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. “United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.” New York: United Nations, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weart, Spencer. The Discovery of Global Warming. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, P. et al. “Risks of Communication: Discourses on Climate Change in Science, Politics and the Mass Media.” Public Understanding of Science 9 (2000): 261–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisskopf, M., and W. Booth. “UN Report Predicts Dire Warming; Break with US Seen in Thatcher Response.” Washington Post, May 26, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westwick, P.J. The National Labs: Science in an American System, 1947–1974. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigley, T.M.L., and S.F. Singer. “Climate Change Report.” Science 271 (1996): 1479–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oreskes, N., Conway, E., Karoly, D.J., Gergis, J., Neu, U., Pfister, C. (2018). The Denial of Global Warming. In: White, S., Pfister, C., Mauelshagen, F. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Climate History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43020-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43020-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-43019-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43020-5

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics