Skip to main content

Biomass and Element Content of Foliage and Aboveground Litterfall on the Three Long-Term Experimental Beech Sites: Dynamics and Significance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Functioning and Management of European Beech Ecosystems

Part of the book series: Ecological Studies ((ECOLSTUD,volume 208))

Abstract

The amount and dynamics of litterfall in a forest stand is recognised as an integrated response, reflecting biologically (hereditary defined) controlled processes of shedding of leaves, roots, bark, fruits and other plant components and the physiologically controlled factors of environmental nature (climate, water availability, nutritional supply and toxicity parameters). Changes in the dynamics of litterfall components (leaves, fruits, florescence, seeds, twigs, etc.), in the short-term, is primarily a reflection of climatic perturbations affecting water and nutrient supply. For example, drought conditions in the early summer preceding mast year (mast year−1) were found to be a very strong predictor of mast production in beech stands of Europe and eastern North America (Piovesan and Adams 2001). An unusually moist, cool summer the year before the drought (mast year−2) increased the predictability of mast production which was associated with carbohydrate build up within the trees which might prime them for floral induction the following year (mast year−1). There is, however, very little known of the accumulation and redistribution of nutrients in association with masting in beech. Litterfall constitutes the transfer of energy between different trophic levels, where energy-rich plant materials are transferred for use by microbial and faunal populations in and on the soil. Despite the significance of litterfall in many ecosystem processes, the main emphasis on litterfall studies during the earlier periods had been to describe the fluctuations, distribution and composition of litterfall (Viro 1955; Kittredge 1948). Emphasis has now shifted to study the role of litterfall in ecosystem functioning especially its role in nutrient cycling processes in forest ecosystems (Khanna and Ulrich 1991). The aim of many studies in forest ecosystems is to develop management options where sustainability of ecosystem productivity and ecological functioning have been appropriately achieved, and for that purpose litterfall can act as a useful indicator. One such parameter is leaf biomass that is related to the health of forest ecosystems, which can be directly deduced from leaf litter, especially in deciduous stands. Another one is the decomposition rate of litterfall components which depends on the quality of litter fall and is thus closely related to the functionality and activity of microbial and faunal populations in soils (Chaps. 12, 12, this volume). Thus, litter fall quality of overstorey and understorey vegetation is closely related to the biodiversity on a forest site. Some essential components of the multi-functions of a forest ecosystem that are closely related to the amount and quality of litterfall are: C source for microbial activity, food for animals (biodiversity) and the use of nutrients for the growth and activity of flora and fauna.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aerts R (1996) Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: are there general patterns? J Ecol 80:131–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson G, Berden M, Rundgren S (1988) Influence of soil animals and metals on decomposition processes: a microcosm experiment. J Environ Qual 17:113–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berendse F, Aerts R (1987) Nitrogen-use efficiency: a biologically-meaningful definition? Funct Ecol 1:293–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg B, Ekbohm G, Soderstrom B, Staaf H (1991) Reduction of decomposition rates of Scots pine needle litter due to heavy-metal pollution. Water Air Soil Pollut 59:165–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS, Moilanen L (1991) Nutritional controls over nitrogen and phosphorus resorption from Alaskan birch leaves. Ecology 72:709–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherbuy B, Joffe R, Gillon D, Rambal S (2001) Internal remobilisation of carbohydrates, lipids, nitrogen and phosphorus in Mediterranean evergreen oak Quercus ilex. Tree Physiol 21:9–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole DW, Rapp M (1981) Element cycling in forest ecosystems. In: Reichle DE (ed) Dynamic properties of forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 314–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Cote B, Fyles JW, Djalivand H (2002) Increasing N and P resorption efficiency and proficiency in northern deciduous hardwoods with decreasing foliar N and P concentrations. For Sci 59: 275–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughtrey PJ, Jones CH, Martin MH, Shales SW (1979) Litter accumulation in woodlands contaminated by Pb, Zn, Cd and Cu. Oecologia 39:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duquesnay A, Dupouey JL, Clement A, Ulrich E, Tacon Le F (2000) Spatial and temporal variability of foliar mineral concentration in beech (Fagus sylvatica) stands in northeastern France. Tree Physiol 20:13–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ewald J (2000) Ist Phosphormangel für die geringe Vitalität von Buchen (Fagus sylvatica L.) in den Bayerischen Alpen verantwortlich? Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 119:276–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flückiger W, Braun S (1998) Nitrogen deposition in Swiss forests and its possible relevance for leaf nutrient status, parasite attacks and soil acidification. Environ Pollut 102:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flückiger W, Braun S (1999) Nitrogen and its effect on growth, nutrient status and parasite attacks in beech and Norway spruce. Water Air Soil Pollut 116:99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodzinski W, Greszta J, Laskowski R, Maryanski M, Rozen A (1990) Effect of the chemical composition of industrial dusts on forest floor organic matter accumulation. Water Air Soil Pollut 53:169–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber F (2006) Über die Vitalität der Rotbuche (Fagus sylvatica L.). Schriftreihe Dendrologie, Baumpflege und Waldbotanik. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüttl R (1992) Die Nährelementversorgung geschädigter Wälder in Europa und Nordamerika. Freiburger Bodenkundl. Abhandlungen 28. Habil. Arbeit

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna PK, Ulrich B (1991) Ecochemistry of temperate deciduous forests. In: Röhrig E, Ulrich B (eds) Ecosystems of the World 7 – temperate deciduous forests. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 121–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Killham K, Wainwright M (1981) Deciduous leaf litter and cellulose decomposition in soil exposed to heavy atmospheric pollution. Environ Pollut 26:70–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Killingbeck KT (1986) The terminological jungle revisited: making a case for use of the term resorption. Oikos 46:263–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killingbeck K (1996) Nutrients in senescent leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology 77:1716–1727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittredge J (1948) Forest Influences. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauß HH, Heinsdorf D (2005) Ernährungsstufen für wichtige Wirtschaftsbaumarten. Beitr Forstwirtsch Landschökol 39:172–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Laskowski R, Maryanski M, Niklinska M (1994) Effect of heavy metals and mineral nutrients on forest litter respiration rate. Environ Pollut 84:97–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lebret M, Nys C, Forgeard F (2001) Litter production in an Atlantic beech (Fagus sylvatica L.): time sequence. Ann For Sci 58:755–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuschner C, Meier IC, Hertel D (2006) On the niche breadth of Fagus sylvatica: soil nutrient status in 50 Central European beech stands on a broad range of bedrock types. Ann For Sci 63:355–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McBrayer JF, Cromack K (1980) Effect of snow-pack on oak-litter release in a Minnesota forest. Pedobiologia 20:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Meentemeyer V, Box EO, Thompson R (1982) World patterns and amounts of terrestrial plant litter production. BioScience 32:125–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier IC, Leuschner C, Hertel D (2005) Nutrient return with leaf litter fall in Fagus sylvatica forests across a soil fertility gradient. Plant Ecol 177:99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambiar EKS, Fife DN (1991) Nutrient retranslocation in temperate conifers. Tree Physiol 9:185–207

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oren R, Schulze E‐D (1989) Nutritional disharmony and forest decline: a conceptual model. In: Schulze E‐D, Lange OL, Oren R (eds) Forest decline and air pollution, Ecological Studies 77. Springer, Berlin, pp 425–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Paar U, Kirchhoff A, Westphal J, Eichhorn J (2000) Fruktifikation der Buche in Hessen. AFZ‐Der Wald 55:1362–1363

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen LB, Bille-Hansen J (1999) A comparison of litterfall and element fluxes in even aged Norway spruce, sitka spruce and beech stands in Denmark. For Ecol Manage 114:55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piovesan G, Adams JM (2001) Masting behaviour in beech – linking reproduction and climatic variation. Can J Bot/Rev Can Bot 79:1039–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhling A, Tyler G (1973) Heavy metal pollution and decomposition of spruce needle litter. Oikos 24:402–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santa‐Regina I, Tarazona T (1999) Organic matter dynamics in beech and pine stands of mountainous Mediterranean climate area. Ann For Sci 56:667–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt W (2006) Zeitliche Veränderung der Fruktifikation bei der Rotbuche (Fagus sylvatica L.) in einem Kalkbuchenwald (1981–2004). Allg Forst Jagdzeitung 177:9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Staaf H (1980) Release of plant nutrients from decomposing leaf litter in a South Swedish beech forest. Holarctic Ecol 3:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Staaf H (1982) Plant nutrient changes in beech leaves during senescence as influenced by site characteristics. Oecol Plant 3:161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachurski A, Zimka JK (1975) Methods of studying forest ecosystems: leaf area, leaf production and withdrawal from leaves of trees. Ekol Polska 23:637–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Viro PJ (1955) Investigations on forest litter. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 45(6):1–65

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff B, Riek W (1997) Deutscher Waldbodenbericht 1996 Bd 1. BMELF, Bonn, Germany

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. K. Khanna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khanna, P.K., Fortmann, H., Meesenburg, H., Eichhorn, J., Meiwes, K.J. (2009). Biomass and Element Content of Foliage and Aboveground Litterfall on the Three Long-Term Experimental Beech Sites: Dynamics and Significance. In: Brumme, R., Khanna, P.K. (eds) Functioning and Management of European Beech Ecosystems. Ecological Studies, vol 208. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/b82392_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics