Skip to main content

Reoperative Surgery for Prostate Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 818 Accesses

Abstract

The best treatment for prostate cancer is an individualized choice specific to each patient. The decision to undergo prostate cancer surgery is based on several factors including the patient’s preoperative health status, ability to gain oncologic control, and the patient’s previous surgical history. When considering a patient for radical prostatectomy (RP), previous prostate surgery must be considered. Reoperative surgery for prostate cancer can be associated with technical challenges that may impact the long-term functional and oncologic outcomes. Previous prostate procedures can vary from treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) to primary local therapy for prostate cancer. Thus, one must be aware of the added challenges and risks that such surgical history portends and relate this information to the patient prior to radical prostatectomy. In this chapter, we seek to outline how previous prostate surgery impacts the technical aspects and outcomes of both primary and salvage radical prostatectomy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bandhauer K, Senn E. Radical retropubic prostatectomy after transurethral prostate resection. Eur Urol. 1988;15:180–181.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lindner A, DeKernion JB, Smith RB, et al. Risk of urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 1983;129:1007–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elder JS, Gibbons RP, Correa RJ, et al. Morbidity of radical perineal prostatectomy following transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol. 1984; 132: 55–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Rogers E, et al. Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 1996;156(5):1707–1713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Colombo R, Naspro R, Salonia A, et al. Radical prostatectomy after previous prostate surgery: clinical and functional outcomes. J Urol. 2006;176:2459–2463.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Katz R, Borkowski T, Hoznek A et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients following transurethral resection of the prostate. Urol Int. 2006;77:216–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stolzenberg J, Kossen MT, Minh D, et al. Impact of previous surgery on endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2005;65:325–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Borboroglu PG, Sands JP, Roberts JL, et al. Risk factors for vesicourethral anastomotic stricture after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2000;56:96–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Catalona WJ, Carvhalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS. Potency, continence, and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol. 1999;162: 433–438.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Menard Y, Guillaume G, Hoznek A, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with and without previous transurethral prostate resection. J Urol. 2006;175:368A.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sacco E, Prayer-Galetti T, Pinto F, et al. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with long-term follow-up. BJU. 2006; 97:1234–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eden CG, Richards AJ, Ooi J, et al. Previous bladder outlet surgery does not affect medium-term outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU. 2006;99:399–402.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guilloneau B, El-Fettouh H, Baumert H, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsouris institute. J Urol. 2003;169:1261–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Walsh PC. Radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostatic carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am. 1982;7:583.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goodwin WE. Radical prostatectomy after previous prostatic surgery: technical problems encountered in treatment of occult carcinoma. JAMA. 1952;148:799.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramon J, Rossignol G, Leandri P, et al. Morbidity of radical retropubic prostatectomy following previous prostate resection. J Surg Oncol. 1994;55:9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roehl KA, Han M, Ramos CG, et al. Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical prostatectomy in 3.478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J Urol. 2004;172:910–914.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hull GW, Rabbani F, Scardino PT, et al. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol. 2002;167:528–534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Blute ML, Bostwick DG, Bergstrath EJ, et al. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 1997;50:733–739.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Katz R, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of apical dissection, bladder, neck remodeling, and nerve preservation. J Urol. 2003;169:2049–2052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Iselin CE, Robertson JE, Paulson DF. Radical perineal prostatectomy: oncological outcome during a 20-year period. J Urol. 1999;161:163–168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stolzenburg JW, Rabenault R, Do M, et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the University of Leipzig experience of 1,300 cases. World J Urol. 2007;25:45–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Secin FP, Serio A, Bianco FJ, et al. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for side-specific positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51:764–771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Suruya BV, Provet J, Johanson KE, et al. Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: risk factors and management. J Urol. 1990;143:755–758.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tomschi W, Suster G, Holtl W. Bladder neck strictures after radical retropubic prostatectomy: still an unsolved problem. BJU. 1998;81:823–826.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kostakopoulos A, Argiropoulos V, Protogerou V, et al. Vesicourethral anastomotic strictures after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the experience of a single institution. Urol Int. 2004;72:17–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Park R, Martin S, Goldberg JD, et al. Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: insights into incidence, effectiveness of intervention, effect on continence, and factors predisposing to occurrence. Urology. 2001;57:742–746.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Steiner MS, Morton RA, Walsh PC. Impact of anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy on urinary continence. J Urol. 1991;145:512–515.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Eastham JA, Scardino PT. Radical prostatectomy. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughn ED, et al., eds. Campbell’s Urology. Philadelphia: Saunders, Elsevier Science; 2002:3080–3102.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol. 1982;128:492–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC, Smith MD, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the international index of erectile function. Urology. 1999;54:346–351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Gendrano N. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a state-of-the-science review. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14:226–244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, et al. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49:822–830.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nichols RT, Barry MJ, Hodges CV. The morbidity of radical prostatectomy for multifocal stage I prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Urol. 1977;117:83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bass RB and Barrett DM. Radical retropubic prostatectomy after transurethral prostatic resection. J Urol. 1980;124:495.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Stephenson AJ, Eastham JA. Role of salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8198–8203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stephenson AJ, Shariat SF, Zelefsky MJ, et al. Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2004;291:1325–1332.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bianco FJ, PT Scardino, Stephenson AJ, et al. Long-term oncologic results of salvage radical prostatectomy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:448–453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gheiler EL, Tefilli MV, Tiguert R, et al. Predictors for maximal outcome in patients undergoing salvage surgery for radio-recurrent prostate cancer. Urology. 1998;51:789–795.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Amling CL, Lerner SE, Martin SK, et al. Deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy and serum prostate specific antigen predict outcome following salvage prostatectomy for radiation refractory prostate cancer. J Urol. 1999;161:857–863.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ward JF, Sebo TJ, Blute ML, et al. Salvage surgery for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: contemporary outcomes. J Urol. 2005;173:1156–1160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sanderson KM, Penson DF, Cai J, et al. Salvage radical prostatectomy: Quality of life outcomes and long-term oncological control of radiorecurrent prostate cancer. J Urol. 2006;176:2025–2032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zagars GK, Pollack A, von Eschenbach AC. Prostate cancer and radiation therapy: the message conveyed by serum prostate-specific antigen. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33:23–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schellhammer PF, Kuban DA, El-Mahdi AM. Treatment of clinical local failure after radiation therapy for prostate carcinoma. J Urol. 1993;150:1851–1855.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Consensus statement: guidelines for PSA following radiation therapy. ASTRO Consensus Panel. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;37:1035–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hanlon AL, Pinover WH, Horwitz EM, et al. Patterns and fate of PSA bouncing following 3D-CRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50:845–849.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rosser CJ, Kuban DA, Levy LB et al. Prostate specific antigen bounce phenomenon after external beam radiation for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2002; 168:2001–2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Critz FA, Williams WH, Benton JB et al. Prostate specific antigen bounce after radioactive seed implantation followed by external beam radiation for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2000;163:1085–1089.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ray ME, Thames HD, Levy LB, et al. PSA nadir predicts biochemical and distant failures after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a multi-institutional analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:1140–1150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Crook JM, Perry GA, Robertson S, et al. Routine prostate biopsies following radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results for 226 patients. Urology. 1995;45:624–631.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Scardino PT. The prognostic significance of biopsies after radiotherapy for prostatic cancer. Semin Urol. 1985;1:243–251.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Crook J, Malone S, Perry G, et al. Postradiotherapy prostate biopsies: what do they really mean? Results for 498 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48:355–367.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Eastham JA, Scardino PT. Salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrence of prostate cancer after radiation. In: Vogelzang NJ, Scardino PT, Shipley WU, et al., eds. Genioturinary Oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:306–314.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Borland RN, Walsh PC. The management of rectal injury during radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 1992;147:905–907.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Guillonneau B, Gupta R, El Fettouh H, et al. Laparoscopic management of rectal injury during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003;169:1694–1696.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Katz R, Borkowski T, Hoznek A, et al. Operative management of rectal injuries during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2003;62:310–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Harpester LE, Rommel FM, Seiber PR, et al. Incidence and management of rectal injury associated with radical prostatectomy in a community based urology practice. J Urol. 1995;154:1435–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Smith AM, Veenema RJ.Management of rectal injury and rectourethral fistulas following radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 1972;108:778–789.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Dillioglugil O, Leibman BD, Leibman NS, et al. Risk factors for complication and morbidity after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 1997;157:1760–1767.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Bianco FJ, et al. Morbidity and functional outcomes after salvagae radical prostatectomy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy. J Urol 2004; 172: 2239–2243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Garzotto M, Wajsman Z. Androgen deprivation with salvage surgery for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: Results at 5-year follow-up. J Urol. 1998;159:950–955.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Cheng L, Sebo TJ, Slezak J, et al. Predictors of survival for prostate carcinoma patients treated with salvage radical prostatectomy after radiation therapy. Cancer. 1998;83:2164–2171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Han M, Partin AW, Chan DY, et al. An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series. J Urol. 2004;171:23–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wei JT, Dunn RL, Litwin MS, et al. Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology. 2000;56:899–905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Masterson TA, Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, et al. Recovery of erectile function after salvage radical prostatectomy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy. Urology. 2005;66:623–626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Russo PM. Salvage radical prostatectomy after radiation therapy and brachytherapy. J Endourol. 2000;14:385–390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Chen BT, Wood DP. Salvage prostatectomy in patients who have failed radiation therapy or cryotherapy as primary treatment for prostate cancer. Urology. 2003;62:69–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Pisters LL, English SF, Scott SM, et al. Salvage prostatectomy with continent catheterizable urinary reconstruction: A novel approach to recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy. J Urol. 2000;163:1771–1774.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Vallancein R, Gupta R, Cathelineau X, et al. Initial results of salvage laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after radiation failure. J Urol. 2003;170:1838–1840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Amling CL, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, et al. Long-term hazard of progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: continued risk of biochemical failure after 5 years. J Urol. 2000;164:101–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Han M, Partin AW, Zahurak M, et al. Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2000;169:517–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Cadeddu JA, Partin AW, De Weese TL, et al. Long-term results of radiation therapy for prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 1998;159:173–177.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Leibovici D, Pagliaro L, Rosser CJ, et al. Salvage surgery for bulky local recurrence of prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005;173:781–783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Amling, C., Clayton, D. (2009). Reoperative Surgery for Prostate Cancer. In: Billingham, R., Kobashi, K., Peters, W. (eds) Reoperative Pelvic Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/b14187_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/b14187_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-89998-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-89999-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics