In contrast to the great success of variational methods, especially finite element methods, for elliptic and even parabolic problems, their application to hyperbolic partial differential equations (PDEs) has met with somewhat less spectacular success. It is fair to say that even today, the most advanced finite element methods for hyperbolic PDEs are not completely satisfactory when compared with specialized finite volume and finite difference schemes. For example, computing monotone finite element solutions that capture solution discontinuities over a narrow band of cells remains a challenging and, for the most part, unresolved task.
The status of least-squares finite element methods (LSFEMs) for hyperbolic problems to a large degree mirrors this situation. Although the idea of replacing a hyperbolic PDE by an attractive Rayleigh–Ritz-like formulation1 is very appealing, its straightforward application, without proper accounting for the distinctions between elliptic and hyperbolic PDEs, may lead to less than satisfactory methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bochev, P.B., Gunzburger, M.D. (2009). Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equations. In: Least-Squares Finite Element Methods. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol 166. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/b13382_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/b13382_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-30888-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-68922-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)