Abstract
In this chapter, we discuss the application of the autonomy technologies considered in previous chapters to spacecraft constellations. The needs of constellations that can be supported by onboard autonomy are described along with the enhancements attainable by constellation missions through the application of onboard autonomy. A list of hypothetical constellation mission types is also posed and a list of governance concepts is then presented in relation to the degree of central control being exercised on the constellation. Finally, the chapter discusses mobile agent concepts to support autonomic constellations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Reprinted from Artificial Intelligence, 145(1–2), Thomas Schetter, Mark Campbell and Derek Surka, Multiple agent-based autonomy for satellite constellations, page 164, Copyright (2003), with permission from Elsevier.
- 2.
Reprinted from Artificial Intelligence, 145(1–2), Thomas Schetter, Mark Campbell and Derek Surka, Multiple agent-based autonomy for satellite constellations, page 154, Copyright (2003), with permission from Elsevier.
- 3.
Reprinted from Artificial Intelligence, 145(1–2), Thomas Schetter, Mark Campbell and Derek Surka, Multiple agent-based autonomy for satellite constellations, page 166, Copyright (2003), with permission from Elsevier.
References
D. G. Boden and W. J. Larson. Cost-Effective Space Mission Operations. McGraw-Hill, NY, 1996.
S. Chien, R. Sherwood, D. Tran, R. Castano, B. Cichy, A. Davies, G. Rabideau, N. Tang, M. Burl, D. Mandl, S. Frye, J. Hengemihle, J. D’Agostino, R. Bote, B. Trout, S. Shulman, S. Ungar, J. Van Gaasbeck, D. Boyer, M. Griffin, H. hua Burke, R. Greeley, T. Doggett, K. Williams, V. Baker, and J. Dohm. Autonomous science on the EO-1 mission. In Proc. International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS), Nara (Japan), May 2003.
T. P. Schetter, M. E. Campbell, and D. M. Surka. Multiple agent-based autonomy for satellite constellations. Artificial Intelligence, 145(1–2):147–180, 2003.
J. B. Smith. Collective Intelligence in Computer-Based Collaboration. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1994.
R. L. Ticker and D. McLennan. NASA’s New Millennium Space Technology 5 (ST5) project. In IEEE Aerospace Conference, volume 7, pages 609–617, Big Sky, MT (USA), March 2000.
W. Truszkowski and C. Rouff. An overview of the NASA LOGOS and ACT agent communities. In Proc. World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Orlando, FL (USA), July 2001.
W. Truszkowski and C. Rouff. Progressive autonomy. In Proc. 2002 NASA/ IEEE Software Engineering Workshop, Greenbelt, MD (USA), December 2002. IEEE Press.
K. Tumer, A. Agogino, and D. Wolpert. Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems, Part 1, “Learning Sequences of Actions in Collectives of Autonomous Agents,” pages 378–385. ACM Press, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Truszkowski, W. et al. (2010). Autonomy in Spacecraft Constellations. In: Autonomous and Autonomic Systems: With Applications to NASA Intelligent Spacecraft Operations and Exploration Systems. NASA Monographs in Systems and Software Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/b105417_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/b105417_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-232-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-233-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)